Fermi Distribution Explained: Energy Levels in Metals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Fermi-Dirac distribution and the behavior of free electrons in metals, as described in Paul Tipler's physics book. Participants clarify that while electrons are considered "free," they are bound within the metal's volume due to the uniform potential well created by atomic cores. The Schroedinger Equation can be applied to derive the discrete energy levels or bands within these materials. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics in understanding electron behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac distribution
  • Familiarity with the free electron model in solid-state physics
  • Knowledge of the Schroedinger Equation
  • Basic concepts of potential wells and energy bands
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the free electron model in metals
  • Learn about the application of the Schroedinger Equation in quantum mechanics
  • Research the concept of energy bands and band structure in solid-state physics
  • Explore the differences between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics regarding particle behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and materials scientists interested in the behavior of electrons in metals and the principles of solid-state physics.

apb86
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I've just started reading about quantum mechanics, so my question may sound silly.
I'm using the book of physics of Paul Tipler. It's says that inside the metals we have a lot of free electrons, like a electrons cloud (like when we learn in the School). These electrons follow the Fermi-Dirac distribution, in which the electrons occupy the energy levels from the lower to the higher ones.

OK, my doubt is:
If these electrons are "free", I understand that they are not bounded to any nucleus (protons). If they are not bounded, how can we establish energy levels. The levels are related to the particle's potential energy, isn't it? But if we don't have the force field crated by the electrostatic force of the protons (Coulomb Law), how can we establish potential energy levels?

Thanks
Alexandre
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Alexandre

As what was mentioned, we can use the free electron cloud model to simulate the behavior of "free" electrons in metals.

In my opinion, it tells us that, the "free" model is good enough to describe the electrons in metal, but it does never have to be equivalent to the tale that "free" electrons are FREE as FREE POINT-PARTICLES we studied in CLASSICAL MECHANICS courses.

Nevertheless, if the "free" electrons are totally FREE, how can they always be bounded in the volume (still, with a small area covers it) of metals.

Clearly, the electrons are bounded, and we may successfully solve the Schroedinger Eq. then get the discontinuous energy levels or energy bands of the metal materials.

Yours,
Nicky
 
(You'd be better off asking this on the Solid State forum!)
If these electrons are "free", I understand that they are not bounded to any nucleus (protons). If they are not bounded, how can we establish energy levels. The levels are related to the particle's potential energy, isn't it?
apb86, In the free electron theory of metals, the atomic cores are smeared out, and the attractive potential that they exert on the electrons is modeled as a uniform potential well, whose depth is called the work function.

Electrons are fermions, meaning that no two can occupy the same state, so they occupy this well with higher and higher energy states, up to the Fermi level. In addition to the uniform potential energy, the electrons therefore have kinetic energy. In this model the available energy levels are uniformly distributed.

In more sophisticated models the atomic cores are assumed to create a potential which is not uniform but periodic (equally spaced bumps), and in this case the electron states have a band structure.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K