Fermi-Dirac distribution, when does it break?

In summary, the Fermi-Dirac distribution is a probability distribution that determines the occupation probability of energy levels for a system of fermions obeying the Pauli exclusion principle. This distribution is valid for non-interacting fermions but may break for interacting fermions. Superconductivity is an example of when the distribution does not apply, as electrons start to behave like bosons. The distribution can be derived using the grand canonical ensemble and can be used in atomic physics as long as the electron-electron interactions are not too strong. The electron-nucleus interaction plays a role in determining the energy levels and orbitals, but the electron-electron interaction is the main factor in determining the validity of the distribution.
  • #1
Telemachus
835
30
Well, the question is if the well known occupation distribution of the energy levels for fermions does break, which means when it is not valid anymore. The Fermi-Dirac distribution reads:

##\displaystyle f_{FD}(E)=\frac{1}{exp\left({\frac{E-\mu}{k_B T}}\right)+1}## And gives the occupation probability for a state of energy E, for a system of fermions, which obeys the Pauli exclusion principle.

So, the question is if this distribution is always valid or not (wikipedia says it's only valid for non interacting fermions). When does it break, and why. For example, an interacting gas of electrons does obey Fermi-Dirac distribution? if not why.

And how do you derive this distribution function? that probably would answer the question and shade light over it's range of applicability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi–Dirac_statistics

For example, in superconductivity something clearly happens, because electrons start to behave like bosons, and do not obey Fermi-Dirac anymore.

This is not homework, is just a question that I was disusing with a friend, who says that is only valid for a free electron gas. I think it is much more general than that, and that electrons (at least, non interacting electrons) should obey Fermi-Dirac in a more general situation, like for example in the occupation of the energy states of an atom (but there, the electrons actually interact, so, according to wikipedia, my friend is actually right).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If the fermions interact notably then the energy levels depend on the occupancies of the energy levels - a feedback not considered in the distribution. Otherwise the distribution works.
Good QM textbooks should explain why it looks like this.
 
  • Like
Likes Telemachus
  • #3
Yes, now I saw it in the wikipedia, it explains the derivation using the grand canonical ensemble I think. Is it a good approximation to use Fermi Dirac distribution in atomic physics? I mean, can one neglect the electrons interactions for this distribution in the atomic orbitals or the interaction is too strong there? and the electron-nucleus interaction doesn't matter, only electron-electron interactions? so, I can place electrons on any arbitrary potential, while they are not interacting with each other, right?
 
  • #4
Just to mention another (quite obvious) case where the FD distribution does not apply is if your system is out of thermal equilibrium.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and Telemachus
  • #5
The electron-nucleon interaction generates the potentials in the first place. The electron-electron interaction is still relevant (the inner electrons are shielding the charge of the nucleus for the outer electrons), but often you can find some approximation that works.
 
  • Like
Likes Telemachus
  • #6
Ok, so the only interaction that matters is the electron-electron interaction, the electron nucleus interaction can be arbitrary, right? because that is the only way that the grand canonical assumption might be violated. So, for example, it might be valid for the outer shells of some atoms, where the electron-electron interaction might not be so important and one can model the (electron+nucleus)-electron like a screened potential of (a modified nucleus charge)-electron, but probably not for the inner shells. Is that right?
 
  • #7
Well, the electron-nucleus interaction determines the energy levels and orbitals, and these determine how strong the electron-electron interactions are... it is a complex system.

With some effective approximation for the shielding effect, and at low temperatures (only a few energy levels play a role and not many electrons are excited) it should give a good approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes Telemachus

1. What is the Fermi-Dirac distribution?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution is a statistical distribution that describes the probability of particles occupying energy levels in a system at thermal equilibrium. It is commonly used in physics, particularly in the study of electrons in a solid state.

2. How is the Fermi-Dirac distribution different from other statistical distributions?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution takes into account the exclusion principle, which states that no two identical fermions can occupy the same quantum state simultaneously. This makes it different from other distributions, such as the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, which does not take into account the exclusion principle.

3. Under what conditions does the Fermi-Dirac distribution break?

The Fermi-Dirac distribution breaks down when the temperature of the system approaches absolute zero. This is because at very low temperatures, the particles in the system will occupy the lowest energy levels, leading to a sharp increase in the probability of occupying a particular energy level. This is known as the Fermi energy.

4. What happens when the Fermi energy is exceeded?

When the Fermi energy is exceeded, the Fermi-Dirac distribution breaks down and the system becomes degenerate. This means that the particles in the system can no longer be described by the distribution and instead follow different statistical laws.

5. Can the Fermi-Dirac distribution be used for systems other than electrons in a solid state?

Yes, the Fermi-Dirac distribution can be applied to any system of identical fermions at thermal equilibrium. This includes particles such as neutrons, protons, and quarks, as well as systems in non-electron environments, such as nuclear matter or white dwarfs.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
978
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
359
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top