Fermi gas at the absolute zero T

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the thermodynamic properties of a Fermi gas at absolute zero temperature, specifically comparing two methods for deriving internal energy and other thermodynamic quantities. Method 1 involves summing the energy states weighted by the average occupation number derived from the grand-canonical ensemble formalism, represented by the equation U=∑(2S+1)ε(k)n(k). Method 2 emphasizes calculating the partition function to derive thermodynamic potentials and average values. The author seeks mathematical proof of the equivalence between these two methods and references that utilize Method 2 for deriving thermodynamic quantities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi gas properties and behavior at absolute zero temperature
  • Familiarity with grand-canonical and canonical ensemble formalisms
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics and partition functions
  • Basic mathematical skills for manipulating thermodynamic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of thermodynamic quantities using the canonical ensemble approach
  • Study the mathematical proof of equivalence between grand-canonical and canonical ensembles
  • Explore advanced statistical mechanics textbooks that focus on Fermi gases
  • Investigate the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on state summation in statistical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, and quantum gases, will benefit from this discussion.

JH_Park
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm currently studying Thermodynamic properties of a Fermi gas at the absolute zero temperature.
I get how the internal energy, pressure... etc of the gas are derived. For example, in computing the internal energy, one sums up all the energy of states weighted by its average occupation number(which is derived from using grand-canonical ensemble formalism) of that states, including a degeneracy of the states.
U=∑(2S+1)ε(k)n(k)
(where S: total spin, ε(k): energy of a standing fermi wave whose wave vector is k,
n(k): average occupation number of k)
I shall call this method as "method 1". This approach intuitively makes sense to me but I found a little bit of subtle mathematical inconsistency in this calculation.
As far as I understand, when we compute an average of some observable quantity in Statistical Mechanics, we first calculate an appropriate partition function depending on which ensembles we use. Then, from the partition function, we next compute the corresponding thermodynamic potentials and by making appropriate derivatives we can get average values of thermodynamic quantities of the ensemble. (method 2)
For consistency, I personally want to derive thermodynamic quantities using the method 2 but all the textbook I reference at follow the method 1. Is there any mathematical proof I can look up saying that method 1 and 2 are essentially identical?? or Is there any reference that actually derives thermodynamic quantities using the method 2?
Sorry for bad english TT
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem of method 2 is that you have to ensure that the sum over states only includes states that are allowed by the Pauli exclusion principle. Starting from the grand canonical ensemble to derive a canonical ensemble solution allows to circumvent that difficulty, by considering only one single-particle state at a time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JH_Park

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K