Fermi temperature of a 1D electron gas

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the Fermi temperature of a one-dimensional electron gas, specifically in a metal wire with one free electron per atom and atomic spacing denoted as ##d##. The Fermi temperature is derived using the equations for energy levels and the density of states, resulting in the formula ##T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m k_\mathrm{B} d^2}##. An alternative approach using Fermi-Dirac statistics yields a different result, approximately 3.5 times larger, prompting a debate on the chemical potential ##\mu## at the Fermi temperature, which is not zero for the 1D case.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fermi-Dirac statistics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts such as energy levels in a box
  • Knowledge of the density of states in one dimension
  • Basic principles of statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Fermi temperature in 1D systems using quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of chemical potential in Fermi gases
  • Learn about the differences in Fermi temperature calculations between 1D and 3D systems
  • Investigate the role of the density of states in determining thermodynamic properties
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in condensed matter physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, will benefit from this discussion.

DrClaude
Mentor
Messages
8,477
Reaction score
5,694

Homework Statement



Consider a one-dimensional metal wire with one free electron per atom and an atomic spacing of ##d##. Calculate the Fermi temperature.

Homework Equations



Energy of a particle in a box of length ##L##: ##E_n = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} n^2##

1D density of states: ##g(E) = \frac{L}{\pi \hbar} \sqrt{\frac{2m}{\epsilon}}##

Fermi temperature: ##T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{E_\mathrm{F}}{k_\mathrm{B}}##

Fermi-Dirac occupancy: ##\bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} = \left[ e^{\beta (E - \mu)} + 1 \right]^{-1}##

The Attempt at a Solution



The solution is easy to find by considering the system at ##T=0##, where one simply needs to calculate the energy of the highest occupied level. For ##N## electrons, with ##2## electrons per ##n## state, i.e., ##N= 2 n_\mathrm{max}##,
$$
\begin{align*}
E_\mathrm{F} &= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} n_\mathrm{max}^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{2 m L^2} \left(\frac{N}{2} \right)^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2 \\
&= \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m d^2}
\end{align*}
$$
since ##N/L = 1/d##, so ##T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m k_\mathrm{B} d^2} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2 = \frac{\pi^2 \hbar^2}{8 m k_\mathrm{B}}##.

My problem comes when trying an alternate approach, by considering the system at ##T = T_\mathrm{F}##. In this case, one can calculate the average number of electrons using
$$
N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE
$$
##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##, so the equation becomes
$$
\begin{align*}
N &= \frac{L \sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar} \int_0^\infty \frac{E^{-1/2}}{e^{E / (k_\mathrm{B} T_\mathrm{F})} + 1} dE \\
&= \frac{L \sqrt{2m}}{\pi \hbar} \left(1 - \sqrt{2} \right) \sqrt{\pi } \zeta \left(1/2\right) \sqrt{k_\mathrm{B} T_\mathrm{F}}
\end{align*}
$$
from which I recover
$$
T_\mathrm{F} = \frac{\left(2 \sqrt{2}+3\right) \pi \hbar ^2}{2 \zeta^2 \left(1/2\right) k_\mathrm{B} m} \left(\frac{N}{L} \right)^2
$$
Comparing with the approach above, this result is ##\approx 3.5## times bigger.

I am confident of the first result above (and it is the same as I found in some on-line and off-line resources) and would appreciate some help in figuring out what is wrong in the second approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think ##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
TSny said:
I don't think ##\mu(T_\mathrm{F}) = 0##.
That was my initial thought when a saw that solution from a student. We were confused by fig. 7.16 in Schroeder's textbook, which shows the chemical potential go to 0 at ##T_\mathrm{F}##. Looking more closely, that figure is related to problem 7.23 for a the case where ##\mu = 0## at ##T = T_\mathrm{F}##. I guess this is just a special case.

Thanks!
 
It is interesting that for the 3d case, ##\mu \approx 0## at the Fermi temperature. See second page of http://young.physics.ucsc.edu/112/mu_T.pdf . In the graph, you can see that ##\mu= 0## at a temperature slightly less than the Fermi temperature. See also equation (9) on that page.

##\mu## at a given temperature is whatever it has to be in order for ## N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE ## to hold. For the 1d case, ##\mu## is apparently not close to zero at the Fermi temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude
This is indeed interesting. If I calculate
$$
N = \int_0^\infty \bar{n}_\mathrm{FD} g(E) dE
$$
for a 3D Fermi gas with ##\mu=0## and solve for the temperature ##T_0##, I find
$$
\frac{T_0}{T_\mathrm{F}} = 2 \left( \frac{2 \sqrt{2}+3}{\pi }\right)^{1/3} \left(\frac{2}{3 \zeta \left(3/2 \right)}\right)^{2/3} \approx 0.988734
$$
confirming that the temperature for which ##\mu=0## is almost the Fermi temperature.
 
Yes. Your result agrees with equation (9) of the link. That's nice.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K