Fermi velocity in a non-degenerate semiconductor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the concept of Fermi velocity in non-degenerate n-type semiconductors, particularly when the Fermi level is situated within the bandgap. It is established that at low temperatures, conduction electrons from thermalized donors contribute to the conduction electron density. The participants agree that the Fermi velocity, typically defined at absolute zero for degenerate systems, becomes less meaningful in non-degenerate conditions where electron distribution follows the Boltzmann statistics. Averaging the wavevector over the Boltzmann distribution is suggested as a method to calculate the average velocity of conduction electrons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics, specifically n-type semiconductors
  • Familiarity with Fermi-Dirac and Boltzmann distributions
  • Knowledge of band theory and energy band structures
  • Basic principles of statistical mechanics as applied to electron distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of conduction electron density in non-degenerate semiconductors
  • Study the implications of temperature on Fermi levels in semiconductors
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of average velocities from Boltzmann distributions
  • Explore the differences between degenerate and non-degenerate electron gases
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and materials scientists interested in semiconductor behavior, particularly in the context of electronic properties and thermal effects in non-degenerate systems.

BeauGeste
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Ok, so let's say we have a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor such that the Fermi-level/chemical potential is somewhere in the bandgap (probably needs to be low temperature). Typically in a metal you would say that the Fermi velocity is \hbar k_F/m_e. But since the Fermi-energy is below the conduction band, that doesn't seem to make sense.

My thought would be that since we are at a non-zero temperature, there are some conduction electrons from the donors simply due to thermodynamics. So my thought would be to find the conduction electron density due to thermalized donors and use that as n_c and then use the standard expressions for Fermi wavevector and Fermi velocity.

What do you think?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BeauGeste,

The concept of the fermi-velocity is clearly defined at T=0 when you have a degenerate gas, and all electron levels are filled up to EF (Fermi-Dirac distribution). But in the case you are describing, the electrons in the conduction band are distributed according to Boltzmann, and this means there is really no sharp edge in the electron distribution, So I do not see how to define a meaningful Fermi velocity. What are you trying to calculate ?

Regards

BeauGeste said:
Hi,

Ok, so let's say we have a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor such that the Fermi-level/chemical potential is somewhere in the bandgap (probably needs to be low temperature).

a remark: in a non-degenerate semiconductor, the Fermi-Level is always (almost by definition) in the bandgap, especially at higher temperatures. At sufficiently high temperatures, all semiconductors become intrinsic and in this region, the Fermi level is somewhere in the middle of the bandgap
 
Thanks for your reply.

I would like to determine the (average, I guess) velocity of electrons in the conduction band in the system I described. So I guess I would have to average k_F over the Boltzmann distribution since there will be a distribution of velocities.
 
i would suppose that averaging the velocities (velocity should be something like gradkEn(k)/\hbar for an electron in a level specified by a band index n and wave vector k) over Boltzmann would give more meaningful results.

the concept of Fermi-velocity (or Fermi-impulse) is only properly defined for a degenerate system of fermions, and for me, a non-degenerate semiconductor is pretty far away from being exactly that

cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K