Fermi Energy Calculations About Non Parabolic Dispersions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of Fermi energy and momentum in systems with non-parabolic dispersion relations, particularly focusing on two-dimensional systems. Participants explore the implications of non-quadratic dispersions on these calculations and the methods to evaluate them.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the standard approach for calculating Fermi energy and momentum for free electrons and expresses difficulty in applying this to non-parabolic dispersions, specifically mentioning a cubic dispersion relation.
  • Another participant argues that for isotropic non-quadratic dispersions, integration is unnecessary, suggesting that the volume of the occupied state can be used to find Fermi momentum and energy through geometric considerations.
  • A later reply reiterates the previous point about isotropic systems, emphasizing the use of the volume of the Fermi surface to derive Fermi momentum and energy without integration.
  • Another participant notes that while the filling of bands is intuitive for isotropic cases, complexities arise when bands are not symmetric, potentially leading to more complicated Fermi surface shapes.
  • One participant requests literature recommendations on the topic, indicating a desire for further understanding.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that isotropic non-quadratic dispersions can simplify the calculation of Fermi energy and momentum, but there is no consensus on the best approach or the implications of non-symmetric bands, which remain a point of contention.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about isotropy and the nature of the dispersion are made, which may not hold in all cases. The discussion also highlights the potential complexity of Fermi surfaces in non-symmetric band structures, which is not fully resolved.

MartinCort
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Greetings!
It is easy to understand that for a free electron, we can easily define the energy state density, and by doing the integration of the State density* Fermi-Dirac distribution we will be able to figure out the chemical potential at zero kelvin, which is the Fermi-Energy. Hence, we can define the Fermi Momentum correspondingly.

However, I feel rather struggling to define the fermi-momentum and Fermi energy for a non-parabolic dispersion.

Say, For example, A 2D system, I have a dispersion
E = A*k^2 +B*k^3

So k(E) will be in general complicated due to its cubic relations.

So If we still want to evaluate the Fermi Energy, Do still solve the integration
int _0 ^E_f state density*Fermi-Dirac Distribution dE = Number of Particles
to evaluate E_f?

And I think this integration will be very complicated.

Also, Under this circumstance, how do we define the Ferim-Momentum? Do we still solve
E_f = A k_F^2 + B k_F^3 to find k_F?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Non-quadratic dispersion is not a big deal as long as the system is isotropic. You don't need to integrate anything!
All you need is a volume of the occupied state. For 3D case, the Fermi surface is a sphere whose volume is equal to ## V_F = \frac 4 3 \pi k^3_F##. If you have one electron per primitive unit cell, the Fermi sphere volume is 1/2 the volume of the first Brillouin zone. That gives you the Fermi momentum using elementary math. Then the Fermi energy can be easily obtained by inserting the Fermi momentum value into the dispersion formula. For the 2-D case, the Fermi surface is a cylinder. Project that onto a plane and use planar geometry formulae.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MartinCort
Henryk said:
Non-quadratic dispersion is not a big deal as long as the system is isotropic. You don't need to integrate anything!
All you need is a volume of the occupied state. For 3D case, the Fermi surface is a sphere whose volume is equal to ## V_F = \frac 4 3 \pi k^3_F##. If you have one electron per primitive unit cell, the Fermi sphere volume is 1/2 the volume of the first Brillouin zone. That gives you the Fermi momentum using elementary math. Then the Fermi energy can be easily obtained by inserting the Fermi momentum value into the dispersion formula. For the 2-D case, the Fermi surface is a cylinder. Project that onto a plane and use planar geometry formulae.

Thanks for your reply!

I think I somehow understand the idea of this. Would you like to recommend some literature on these materials?
 
I don't know anything specific about non-quadratic dispersion. But this should be intuitive. You fill up the band with all available electrons and as long as the dispersion is isotropic, the shape of the Fermi surface is spherical. From Born-van Karman boundary conditions, you will get that number of allowed states in each band is equal to 2 x number of Bravais cells in the crystal (2 because of spin degeneracy). This point is easy to see in the case of a cubic lattice.
If the bands are not symmetric, then the situation gets a bit more complicated. In simpler case, they could be ellipsoidal. These could happen in semi-metals when the bands are much less than 1/2 full. In general, the shape can be quite complex. See for example Ashcroft and Mermin for some examples. I did Fermi surface calculations for intercalated graphite and had to do numerical calculations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K