Fermi velocity in a non-degenerate semiconductor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of Fermi velocity in a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor, particularly when the Fermi level is situated within the bandgap. Participants explore the implications of temperature on electron distribution and the definition of Fermi velocity in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that in a non-degenerate semiconductor at low temperatures, the Fermi velocity can be approximated using conduction electron density from thermally activated donors.
  • Another participant argues that the Fermi velocity is well-defined only at absolute zero for a degenerate gas, and questions the meaningfulness of defining it in a non-degenerate semiconductor where electron distribution follows a Boltzmann distribution.
  • A later reply proposes averaging the wavevector over the Boltzmann distribution to determine the average velocity of electrons in the conduction band.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the concept of Fermi velocity is primarily applicable to degenerate systems and expresses skepticism about its relevance in non-degenerate semiconductors.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of Fermi velocity in non-degenerate semiconductors, with no consensus reached on its definition or relevance in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions regarding temperature effects on electron distribution and the definitions of Fermi velocity that remain unresolved. The discussion highlights the complexity of applying concepts typically associated with degenerate systems to non-degenerate scenarios.

BeauGeste
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Ok, so let's say we have a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor such that the Fermi-level/chemical potential is somewhere in the bandgap (probably needs to be low temperature). Typically in a metal you would say that the Fermi velocity is \hbar k_F/m_e. But since the Fermi-energy is below the conduction band, that doesn't seem to make sense.

My thought would be that since we are at a non-zero temperature, there are some conduction electrons from the donors simply due to thermodynamics. So my thought would be to find the conduction electron density due to thermalized donors and use that as n_c and then use the standard expressions for Fermi wavevector and Fermi velocity.

What do you think?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi BeauGeste,

The concept of the fermi-velocity is clearly defined at T=0 when you have a degenerate gas, and all electron levels are filled up to EF (Fermi-Dirac distribution). But in the case you are describing, the electrons in the conduction band are distributed according to Boltzmann, and this means there is really no sharp edge in the electron distribution, So I do not see how to define a meaningful Fermi velocity. What are you trying to calculate ?

Regards

BeauGeste said:
Hi,

Ok, so let's say we have a non-degenerate n-type semiconductor such that the Fermi-level/chemical potential is somewhere in the bandgap (probably needs to be low temperature).

a remark: in a non-degenerate semiconductor, the Fermi-Level is always (almost by definition) in the bandgap, especially at higher temperatures. At sufficiently high temperatures, all semiconductors become intrinsic and in this region, the Fermi level is somewhere in the middle of the bandgap
 
Thanks for your reply.

I would like to determine the (average, I guess) velocity of electrons in the conduction band in the system I described. So I guess I would have to average k_F over the Boltzmann distribution since there will be a distribution of velocities.
 
i would suppose that averaging the velocities (velocity should be something like gradkEn(k)/\hbar for an electron in a level specified by a band index n and wave vector k) over Boltzmann would give more meaningful results.

the concept of Fermi-velocity (or Fermi-impulse) is only properly defined for a degenerate system of fermions, and for me, a non-degenerate semiconductor is pretty far away from being exactly that

cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K