This question relates to Griffiths: Introduction to Elementary Particles, p. 196(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The process in question is a neutral pion decay into two photons. It is stated that because the secondary particles are massless, the amplitude for this process is:

[tex]

M(p_2,p_3)

[/tex]

where [tex]p_2[/tex] and [tex]p_3[/tex] are the momentum three-vectors of the secondary photons. Conservation of momentum further implies that [tex]p_2=-p_3[/tex]. So far, so good.

However, Griffiths then states that

[tex]

|M|^2

[/tex]

is a function of |p_2| only, meaning that |M|^2 has no angular dependency. Why is this?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Fermi's Golden Rule (Decay Amplitude)

Loading...

Similar Threads - Fermi's Golden Rule | Date |
---|---|

I Fermi's golden rule derivation | Jul 19, 2017 |

A Fermis golden rule and transition rates | Mar 30, 2016 |

Fermi's Golden Rule | Dec 25, 2015 |

Are photons really particles or just a misconception? | Sep 1, 2015 |

Fermi's Golden Rule Density of States | Oct 19, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**