Fermi's Golden Rule (Decay Amplitude)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 5K views
getPhysical()
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This question relates to Griffiths: Introduction to Elementary Particles, p. 196

The process in question is a neutral pion decay into two photons. It is stated that because the secondary particles are massless, the amplitude for this process is:

[tex] M(p_2,p_3)[/tex]

where [tex]p_2[/tex] and [tex]p_3[/tex] are the momentum three-vectors of the secondary photons. Conservation of momentum further implies that [tex]p_2=-p_3[/tex]. So far, so good.

However, Griffiths then states that
[tex] |M|^2[/tex]
is a function of |p_2| only, meaning that |M|^2 has no angular dependency. Why is this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org