Feynman Path Integral - All Possible Paths - Relativity Conflict?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Feynman Path Integral formulation in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the concept that an electron can take "all possible paths" from the source to the detector screen. The participant questions the validity of this idea by introducing the constraint of time, suggesting that not all paths are physically permissible due to temporal limitations. The conversation highlights the four-dimensional space-time framework used in the path integral formulation, where time is treated as an imaginary number, allowing for unconventional interpretations of distance and path. The participant also speculates on the implications of a single electron accounting for multiple observations through its potential to traverse all paths.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Feynman Path Integral formulation
  • Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics and the two-slit experiment
  • Familiarity with four-dimensional space-time concepts
  • Concept of imaginary numbers in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Feynman Path Integral formulation in detail
  • Explore the implications of time as an imaginary number in quantum mechanics
  • Research the two-slit experiment and its significance in quantum theory
  • Investigate the concept of single-particle interpretations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of the Feynman Path Integral and its interpretations in modern physics.

lovatto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello

I have not familiarised myself with the mathematics etc I merely have the conceptual idea that, for example, with the two slit experiement and electron is permitted to take "all possible paths" from the electron gun to the detector screen.

The thought occurred (and as will all thoughts like this it will have obviously occurred to everyone else, I am only after an explanation, I am not claiming to have found a flaw etc)that not all paths are permitted.

An electron is fired at t0 and hits the screen at t1. There is obviously a finite number of permitable paths as the time limit imposes constraints, in that it can't have gone to the andromeda galaxy and back to the screen as there is simply not enough time for the electron to propagate that distance.

Can somebody point out how this is reconciled in the path integral formulation, or whether this exposes a fundamental misunderstanding on my part?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe the formulation occurs in a four dimensional space/time which has some supporting features for this kind of thing.
The concept of "distance" in space/time is different, it includes time and the speed of light (both squared) subtracted from the sums of squares of the usual three space dimensions, all under the radical.

I'm probably mangling this explanation, but it is something like this means that the idea of space distance alone becomes zero between any two event points and time is treated as an imaginary number so the electron is free to travel "paths" through space/time forward and backward.

While I am mangling things, this raises another question... if one electron can truly take all paths, do we need to have more than one electron? With sufficient paths forward and backward in time and covering all possible paths might it only take a single electron to account for all observations and suggest a reason why they all look alike? Sort of like using a single straw to weave a basket; it might look like a lot of individual straws until you notice how it was made...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 157 ·
6
Replies
157
Views
17K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
970
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K