MHB Field Extensions - Dummit and Foote - Exercise 13, Section 13.2 .... ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.

I am currently studying Section 13.2 : Algebraic Extensions

I need some help with Exercise 13 of Section 13.2 ... ... indeed, I have not been able to make a meaningful start on the problem

Exercise 13 of Section 13.2 reads as follows:
View attachment 6611
Definitions that may be relevant to solving this exercise include the following:View attachment 6612A result which seems relevant is Lemma 16 plus the remarks that follow its proof ... Lemma 16 and the following remarks read as follows:
View attachment 6613
As indicated above I need help in order to make a meaningful or significant start on the solution to this exercise .. ...

One thought, though ... there must be some way to use $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... perhaps in establishing the dimension of $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_{k + 1} )$$ over $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_{k } )$$ ... and hence getting some knowledge of $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_n )$$ over $$\mathbb{Q}$$ ... but even if we do gain such knowledge, how do we use it to show $$\sqrt [3]{2} \notin F$$ ... ...

... AND FURTHER ... anyway ... what is implied by $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... ... ?
Help will be much appreciated ...Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Let $F_0 = \Bbb Q$, $F_1 = \Bbb Q(\alpha_1)$, and $F_i = F_{i-1}(\alpha_i)$ for $1 \le i \le n$. Show that $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. Deduce that $[F:\Bbb Q]$ is a power of $2$. By degree considerations show that $\sqrt[3]{2}\notin F$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Let $F_0 = \Bbb Q$, $F_1 = \Bbb Q(\alpha_1)$, and $F_i = F_{i-1}(\alpha_i)$ for $1 \le i \le n$. Show that $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. Deduce that $[F:\Bbb Q]$ is a power of $2$. By degree considerations show that $\sqrt[3]{2}\notin F$.
Hi Euge ... thanks for the help ...

You advise that I show that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ is either 1 or 2 ...

Now we are given that $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$

Now ... $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q} \Longrightarrow \alpha_i$$ is a root of a polynomial $$x^2 - r$$ where $$r \in \mathbb{Q}$$ Now, $$\alpha_i $$ being the root of $$x^2 - r$$ seems to imply that $$ x^2 - r$$ is the minimum polynomial for $$\alpha_i$$ and for the extension $$F_i / F_{i - 1}$$ ... ... BUT ... ... that is only true if $$x^2 - r$$ is irreducible ... and it will not be if $$\alpha_i \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... which it may be ... then $$ x^2 - r = (x - \alpha_i ) (x + \alpha_i ) $$ ... that is $$x^2 - r$$ is reducible ... and the minimal polynomial is $$x - \alpha_i$$ and is of degree 1 ... ... so that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }] = 1 $$ ... ... Is that set of remarks basically correct ...?How do argue rigorously that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ may be 2 ... I think it is 2 if $$ \alpha_i \notin \mathbb{Q}$$ ... is that right ... but what is the rigorous and precise argument that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ may be equal to 2 ... ...Can you help ... I am a bit unsure on this matter ...

Peter
NOTE 1 ... Despite being unsure ... I may have (almost) made an argument for $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }] $$ being either 1 or 2 ...

NOTE 2 ... I acknowledge some help from the Physics Forums ...
 
You have the right idea, but you're overthinking this a bit. Since $\alpha_i$ is a root of a quadratic polynomial in $F_{i-1}[x]$, its minimal polynomial over $F_{i-1}$ has degree no greater than $2$, and thus $[F_{i-1}(\alpha_i) : F_{i-1}] \le 2$, i.e., $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. That's all we need.
 
Euge said:
You have the right idea, but you're overthinking this a bit. Since $\alpha_i$ is a root of a quadratic polynomial in $F_{i-1}[x]$, its minimal polynomial over $F_{i-1}$ has degree no greater than $2$, and thus $[F_{i-1}(\alpha_i) : F_{i-1}] \le 2$, i.e., $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. That's all we need.
Thanks Euge ... ... think I get the idea ...

Essentially then, it follows that ...

$$[ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] = 2^k$$ where $$0 \le k \le n$$
Now to complete the exercise ... ... suppose $$\sqrt [3]{2} \in F$$ ... ... ( ... and try for a contradiction ... )Then since $$\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) \subseteq F $$... we have that ...$$[ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ] = [ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) ] [ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$So that $$2^k = [ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) ] 3$$... BUT ... $$3$$ does not divide $$2^k$$ ... ... Contradiction!So $$\sqrt [3]{2} \notin F $$
Can someone please confirm that the above is correct ... ...

Peter
 
Now you've got it! Great job!
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K