MHB Field Extensions - Dummit and Foote - Exercise 13, Section 13.2 .... ....

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Dummit and Foote, Chapter 13 - Field Theory.

I am currently studying Section 13.2 : Algebraic Extensions

I need some help with Exercise 13 of Section 13.2 ... ... indeed, I have not been able to make a meaningful start on the problem

Exercise 13 of Section 13.2 reads as follows:
View attachment 6611
Definitions that may be relevant to solving this exercise include the following:View attachment 6612A result which seems relevant is Lemma 16 plus the remarks that follow its proof ... Lemma 16 and the following remarks read as follows:
View attachment 6613
As indicated above I need help in order to make a meaningful or significant start on the solution to this exercise .. ...

One thought, though ... there must be some way to use $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... perhaps in establishing the dimension of $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_{k + 1} )$$ over $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_{k } )$$ ... and hence getting some knowledge of $$F( \alpha_1 , \alpha_2, \ ... \ ... \ \ \alpha_n )$$ over $$\mathbb{Q}$$ ... but even if we do gain such knowledge, how do we use it to show $$\sqrt [3]{2} \notin F$$ ... ...

... AND FURTHER ... anyway ... what is implied by $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... ... ?
Help will be much appreciated ...Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Peter,

Let $F_0 = \Bbb Q$, $F_1 = \Bbb Q(\alpha_1)$, and $F_i = F_{i-1}(\alpha_i)$ for $1 \le i \le n$. Show that $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. Deduce that $[F:\Bbb Q]$ is a power of $2$. By degree considerations show that $\sqrt[3]{2}\notin F$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Peter,

Let $F_0 = \Bbb Q$, $F_1 = \Bbb Q(\alpha_1)$, and $F_i = F_{i-1}(\alpha_i)$ for $1 \le i \le n$. Show that $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. Deduce that $[F:\Bbb Q]$ is a power of $2$. By degree considerations show that $\sqrt[3]{2}\notin F$.
Hi Euge ... thanks for the help ...

You advise that I show that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ is either 1 or 2 ...

Now we are given that $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q}$$

Now ... $$\alpha_i^2 \in \mathbb{Q} \Longrightarrow \alpha_i$$ is a root of a polynomial $$x^2 - r$$ where $$r \in \mathbb{Q}$$ Now, $$\alpha_i $$ being the root of $$x^2 - r$$ seems to imply that $$ x^2 - r$$ is the minimum polynomial for $$\alpha_i$$ and for the extension $$F_i / F_{i - 1}$$ ... ... BUT ... ... that is only true if $$x^2 - r$$ is irreducible ... and it will not be if $$\alpha_i \in \mathbb{Q}$$ ... which it may be ... then $$ x^2 - r = (x - \alpha_i ) (x + \alpha_i ) $$ ... that is $$x^2 - r$$ is reducible ... and the minimal polynomial is $$x - \alpha_i$$ and is of degree 1 ... ... so that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }] = 1 $$ ... ... Is that set of remarks basically correct ...?How do argue rigorously that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ may be 2 ... I think it is 2 if $$ \alpha_i \notin \mathbb{Q}$$ ... is that right ... but what is the rigorous and precise argument that $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }]$$ may be equal to 2 ... ...Can you help ... I am a bit unsure on this matter ...

Peter
NOTE 1 ... Despite being unsure ... I may have (almost) made an argument for $$[ F_i \ : \ F_{ i - 1 }] $$ being either 1 or 2 ...

NOTE 2 ... I acknowledge some help from the Physics Forums ...
 
You have the right idea, but you're overthinking this a bit. Since $\alpha_i$ is a root of a quadratic polynomial in $F_{i-1}[x]$, its minimal polynomial over $F_{i-1}$ has degree no greater than $2$, and thus $[F_{i-1}(\alpha_i) : F_{i-1}] \le 2$, i.e., $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. That's all we need.
 
Euge said:
You have the right idea, but you're overthinking this a bit. Since $\alpha_i$ is a root of a quadratic polynomial in $F_{i-1}[x]$, its minimal polynomial over $F_{i-1}$ has degree no greater than $2$, and thus $[F_{i-1}(\alpha_i) : F_{i-1}] \le 2$, i.e., $[F_i:F_{i-1}]$ is either $1$ or $2$. That's all we need.
Thanks Euge ... ... think I get the idea ...

Essentially then, it follows that ...

$$[ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] = 2^k$$ where $$0 \le k \le n$$
Now to complete the exercise ... ... suppose $$\sqrt [3]{2} \in F$$ ... ... ( ... and try for a contradiction ... )Then since $$\mathbb{Q} \subseteq \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) \subseteq F $$... we have that ...$$[ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ] = [ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) ] [ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) \ : \ \mathbb{Q}] $$So that $$2^k = [ F \ : \ \mathbb{Q} ( \sqrt [3]{2} ) ] 3$$... BUT ... $$3$$ does not divide $$2^k$$ ... ... Contradiction!So $$\sqrt [3]{2} \notin F $$
Can someone please confirm that the above is correct ... ...

Peter
 
Now you've got it! Great job!
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
Back
Top