Field of Fractions: Proof it is a Field

  • Thread starter Thread starter beetle2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Fractions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the field of fractions is indeed a field, emphasizing that the finiteness of the integral domain does not affect this proof. The key definition of a field is established: it is an integral domain where every non-zero element has a multiplicative inverse. The participants clarify that the proof should focus on demonstrating that an arbitrary non-zero element in the field of fractions possesses an inverse, drawing parallels to the proof of the rational numbers being a field. The injective and surjective properties of functions in finite versus infinite domains are also discussed, highlighting their implications in the context of integral domains.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral domains and their properties
  • Familiarity with the definition of fields in abstract algebra
  • Knowledge of injective and surjective functions
  • Basic concepts of multiplicative inverses in algebraic structures
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the proof that rational numbers form a field
  • Explore the properties of injective and surjective functions in finite and infinite sets
  • Investigate the implications of the cancellation property in integral domains
  • Learn about the construction of groups and their isomorphisms in abstract algebra
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of fields and integral domains.

beetle2
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I know that for integral domains with finte elements that if we show that each element has a multiplicative inverse then it is a field.

I need to show that the field of fractions is a field.

As the domain is not finite how does that effect the proof of being a field?


regards
Brendan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether the domain is finite or not will be irrelevant unless you have a pretty wacky proof.

Your proof should probably be inspired by how you would prove that the rational numbers are a field, which is obviously infinite
 
The definition of a field is an integral domain in which each non-zero element has an inverse. I don't see where you get the finiteness condition from.
So just take an arbitrary non-zero element in the field of fractions and show that it has an inverse.
 
Is this what you meant by the first question? "If an integral domain is finite then it is a field." This is fairly well-known. To prove it: Suppose x is a nonzero element of a finite integral domain; then find positive integers k > l such that xk = xl. Then prove that xxk-l-1 = 1.
 
If adriank is correct, and you mean prove A. "If an integral domain is finite then it is a field." and B. "Why does this fail if the integral domain is not finite?" then consider the following:

First, if you have an integral domain D any a (not 0) inside D then the function
mult_a: D --> D given by
mult_a(x) = a*x
is injective -exactly- because D is an integral domain:
mult_a(x) = mult_a(y) => a*x = a*y => x=y by cancellation property of integral domains.

But if is D finite, mult_a is also surjective, so for some x, mult_a(x) = 1. So what does this mean about x?

Second, if D is not finite then you can't conclude anything: the function f: Z --> Z (Z = integers) given by f(x) = 2*x is injective but certainly not surjective, and Z is an integral domain.

Anyways, that an injective function f: A --> A is surjective if A is finite is a very important fact in mathematics. That this can fail if A is infinite is equally important. You can use this last fact to construct a (nontrivial) group G so that G x G is isomorphic to G, for example.


Skolem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
987
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K