Figuring out how to approach capacitor problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the behavior of capacitors in a circuit, particularly in relation to the effects of a dielectric on capacitance and charge distribution. Participants are exploring the implications of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law in the context of capacitors connected in series.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining the relationship between charge and voltage across capacitors in series, questioning why the charges remain equal despite changes in capacitance due to a dielectric. There are discussions about the implications of current flow and charge conservation in the circuit.

Discussion Status

There is active engagement with various interpretations of the problem, with some participants providing insights into the behavior of current and charge in series circuits. Guidance has been offered regarding the equality of charge on capacitors in series, and some participants are attempting to clarify their understanding of voltage drops before and after the introduction of a dielectric.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating assumptions about charge distribution and the effects of dielectrics, with some expressing confusion about the implications of these factors on voltage and charge in the circuit. The discussion reflects common misconceptions among students regarding capacitors in series.

RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement



here.jpg

Homework Equations



C = q / voltage

The Attempt at a Solution



OK.
[/B]
By Kirchoff's Voltage Law, we have:

EMF - ( q / Capacitance)x - (q/Capacitance)y = 0

Now. I know that having the dielectric increases the capacitance of X, so the voltage drop across it is smaller, which is in accordance with D being the right answer.

On the other side, I thought that the Charge Qy would have to increase to create a higher voltage drop across capacitor Y to compensate for the decreased voltage drop across capacitor X.

However, the right answer says that the charges on the two capacitors are the same. Why is this the case?

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is how I look at it

Imagine a circuit with just wires with resistance, The current is the same through any point in the circuit because if that wasn't the case we would either see charges disappear(wrong) or see charges build up (Which I think they do for a matter of a really short time until it gets to steady state) but in the steady state we don't see that which means the current through the circuit is the same

This applies to capacitors too, So the current going in capacitor X is the same as the current going in capacitor Y and by I = Q t they have the same charge :D

Or you can even imagine the current as you can't be faster than the slowest current.
 
RoboNerd said:
Now. I know that having the dielectric increases the capacitance of X, so the voltage drop across it is smaller, which is in accordance with D being the right answer.
The voltage across capacitor X is smaller than across capacitor Y.

RoboNerd said:
On the other side, I thought that the Charge Qy would have to increase to create a higher voltage drop across capacitor Y to compensate for the decreased voltage drop across capacitor X.

The charge is the same on both capacitors, as they are connected in series, but you are right, this charge increases with respect to that before inserting the dielectric.
In case of a voltage source of emf E and capacitors C, what is the charge and voltages Vx and Vy before and after inserting the dielectric?
 
RoboNerd said:
On the other side, I thought that the Charge Qy would have to increase to create a higher voltage drop across capacitor Y to compensate for the decreased voltage drop across capacitor X.
Just pointing out a thing, First, not only Qy that increases both Qy and Qx increase and they are always equal.
Second, To compensate the decreased voltage not only the Cy is responsible for increasing the voltage but both of them a Q charge gets added to both of them until their combined voltage reach the source voltage
 
RoboNerd said:
On the other side, I thought that the Charge Qy would have to increase to create a higher voltage drop across capacitor Y to compensate for the decreased voltage drop across capacitor X.

However, the right answer says that the charges on the two capacitors are the same. Why is this the case?

Thanks in advance for the help!

The misconception that it is anything else for capacitors in series seems to be quite common among students. I have been explaining the point in a number of answers, e.g. the link below. Just keep hold of the fact that you always have the overall neutrality really. That the 'inside' pair of plates |-| cannot be anything but neutral overall, because they are not conductively connected to any source of electricity! There is just a charge separation the + on one plate equalling the - on the other. Think, it cannot be otherwise. (So that reduced your choices of answers to two.) And the capacitors themselves -||- it is strictly a misleading manner of speaking to say as you constantly hear that they 'store charge'; overall they are neutral the + on one plate equalling the - on the other, so what they really 'store' is a very local separation of charges.

#4
 
Thanks everyone for the help! Gladly appreciated.

Biker said:
Qy that increases both Qy and Qx increase and they are always equal.
I forgot the fact that the charges have to be equal for two capacitors in series. Thanks for catching that!

ehild said:
In case of a voltage source of emf E and capacitors C, what is the charge and voltages Vx and Vy before and after inserting the dielectric?

For before a dielectric, I use KVL and I have: EMF - (Q / C)x - (Q/C)y = 0 -------> Voltage drop is thus EMF/2 per each capacitor and the charge is going to be equal to EMF* Capacitance /2

After adding a dielectric, I use KVL and I have: EMF - (q / (5C) ) - (q/ C) = 0 -> Charge on each capacitor is going to be equal to (5 / 6) * (EMF * Coriginal). Thus, the voltage drop across Cap. X is going to be the charge divided by the newercapacitance capacitance: (EMF)/6 and the voltage drop across Cap. Y is going to be (5/6)*(EMF/6).

Right? Thanks for the help!
 
RoboNerd said:
Thanks everyone for the help! Gladly appreciated.I forgot the fact that the charges have to be equal for two capacitors in series. Thanks for catching that!
For before a dielectric, I use KVL and I have: EMF - (Q / C)x - (Q/C)y = 0 -------> Voltage drop is thus EMF/2 per each capacitor and the charge is going to be equal to EMF* Capacitance /2

After adding a dielectric, I use KVL and I have: EMF - (q / (5C) ) - (q/ C) = 0 -> Charge on each capacitor is going to be equal to (5 / 6) * (EMF * Coriginal). Thus, the voltage drop across Cap. X is going to be the charge divided by the newercapacitance capacitance: (EMF)/6 and the voltage drop across Cap. Y is going to be (5/6)*(EMF/6).

Right? Thanks for the help!

Vy is wrong, there are too many "6"-s. :smile:
 
Sorry I typed a bit extra. But apart from that?
 
RoboNerd said:
Sorry I typed a bit extra. But apart from that?
Apart from that, it is correct. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RoboNerd
  • #10
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K