Figuring out the curvature of a line?

[mr_coffee]

Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out the curvature of a line, First I'm suppose to make a hypothisis on what i think it would be, then I'm suppose to put a line in parametric vector form and find out really what the curvature of the line is. Well a line is pretty straight, so why can't I say the curvature is 0? or very close to 0? Well i got the line in parametric form passing through point (xo,yo,zo):
x = xo + at
y = yo + bt
z = zo + ct
So a line in 3 dimensions pass through (x1,y1) and (x2, y2) has parametric vector equation:
x = x1 + (x2-x1)t

Did i do this part right? Now I'm confused on what I'm suppose to do! Any help would be great!

 

[amcavoy]

Hello everyone, I'm trying to figure out the curvature of a line, First I'm suppose to make a hypothisis on what i think it would be, then I'm suppose to put a line in parametric vector form and find out really what the curvature of the line is. Well a line is pretty straight, so why can't I say the curvature is 0? or very close to 0? Well i got the line in parametric form passing through point (xo,yo,zo):
x = xo + at
y = yo + bt
z = zo + ct
So a line in 3 dimensions pass through (x1,y1) and (x2, y2) has parametric vector equation:
x = x1 + (x2-x1)t

Did i do this part right? Now I'm confused on what I'm suppose to do! Any help would be great!

The curvature of a line? Think about it. What does curvature mean geometrically? What does a line look like? If you understand the concept of curvature you shouldn't need to do any work at all on this problem

 

[mr_coffee]

well the The curvature is the measure of its deviation from the straightness. So of course its going to be 0 for a line. But he wants us to show what the curvature is, using formula's, so I can't just not show any work.

 

[mr_coffee]

He told us that, if we use the "right" equation, everything will just fall apart?

 

[amcavoy]

He told us that, if we use the "right" equation, everything will just fall apart?

Use r=<x₀+at, y₀+bt, z₀+ct>

and

\kappa =\frac{\left|\mathbf{r}&#039;\times\mathbf{r}&#039;&#039;\right|}{\left|\mathbf{r}&#039;\right|^{3}}

 

[mr_coffee]

Awesome thank u! I ended up with this:


r' = <a,b,c>
r'' = <0,0,0>

|<a,b,c> x <0,0,0>| = 0; so that proves its 0 correct?

 

[amcavoy]

Awesome thank u! I ended up with this:


r' = <a,b,c>
r'' = <0,0,0>

|<a,b,c> x <0,0,0>| = 0; so that proves its 0 correct?

It certainly does.