Fin/Fan heat exchanger mass and energy balance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around performing a mass and energy balance on a fin/fan heat exchanger, focusing on the application of fin efficiency to determine the heat dissipation through the fins. Participants are examining the heat transfer between water and air in the context of a class project, with specific attention to the discrepancies in calculated heat rates.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • The original poster (D) presents a mass and energy balance problem involving a fin/fan heat exchanger, providing specific data on fluid properties and calculated heat rates for both water and air.
  • D questions how to accurately determine the heat passing through the fins, suggesting the use of the NTU method and fin efficiency.
  • One participant challenges the air flow rate of 250,000 CFM, questioning its feasibility given the size of the coil and suggesting a reevaluation of the air flow calculations.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about the relevance of fin efficiency in the context of a mass and energy balance, noting it is typically of interest to heat exchanger designers.
  • D clarifies that the air flow rate was measured using an anemometer and discusses potential confusion regarding the units of measurement, indicating a need for further investigation into the anemometer's readings.
  • A participant points out that the mass flow rate of air translates to an air velocity that seems implausibly high, raising concerns about the accuracy of the measurements and calculations presented.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach consensus on the accuracy of the air flow rate or the relevance of fin efficiency in this context. Multiple competing views remain regarding the calculations and assumptions made.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the accuracy of the anemometer readings and the implications of fin efficiency on the overall heat transfer calculations. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the measurements and their impact on the mass and energy balance.

HethensEnd25
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I am currently working on a project which requires a mass and energy balance on a fin/ fan heat exchanger. The problem I am running into is finding how to apply the fin efficiency to find out the amount of hea tbeing dissipated through the fins. The hot fluid is water and the cooling fluid is air.

Question: How do you find the amount of heat going through the fin/fan?

Problem :

Given:
Base area of fan A=.62 m2
OD of tubes= 15.8mm
ID=unknown
number of tubes = picture included.
Cross Flow one pass fluids unmixed

Water Data:
mass flow rate: 0.898 lb/s
Inlet Temp: 127F
Outlet Temp: 100F
Density @ (avg of temps) = 61.986lb/ft3
Cp= 1Btu/lb*F

Air Data:
Mass flow rate : 310.7 lb/s
Inlet Temp:79.1F
Outlet Temp: 88.95F
Density @ (avg temp): 0.08 lb/ft3
Cp=0.25 Btu/lb*F

Values of density and Cp taken from Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering Seventh Edition.Equations used:

q=mCpΔT

where;
q=heat rate
m=mass flow rate
Cp= specific heat
ΔT=temperature difference between inlet and outlet

q=U0AΔTL
q=heat rate
U= overal heat coefficient
A=area
ΔTL= log mean temperature difference.

Results:

Looking at water

q=24.24 Btu/s

Looking at air
q=765.09 Btu/s

Upon observation the two heat rates clearly do not equal one another.

Thus my problem. How do I find out the true amount of heat passing through the fins? Do I use the NTU method and work backwards for efficiency?

Best Regards,

D

Attached find a picture of the exchanger base with tubes
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2691.JPG
    IMG_2691.JPG
    49 KB · Views: 663
Engineering news on Phys.org
250,000 CFM through that tiny little coil? Not likely. Take another look at how you got your air flow rate.

And why are you looking at fin efficiency? I'm curious because that is normally of interest only to the person designing the heat exchanger, not somebody doing a mass and energy balance.
 
jrmichler said:
250,000 CFM through that tiny little coil? Not likely. Take another look at how you got your air flow rate.

And why are you looking at fin efficiency? I'm curious because that is normally of interest only to the person designing the heat exchanger, not somebody doing a mass and energy balance.

This is being done as a project in class. The air flow rate was acquired by use of an anemometer. All the units were in GPM the bulk fluid properties were looked up. A typical anemometer reading from our experiment showed the inlet and outlet flow ranging from 1200-1600 GPM where the anemometer reads that as “1600x100”. That was a topic of discussion in class as the instructor wasn’t sure if the device was already multiplying the figures by 100 to get the readings. An example being “ is it 1600x100 to get 160,000? Or was it 16x100 to get the reading 1600”. If you could clarify that issue it would be tremendous. I plan on going back into the lab to find the model of the anemometer.

I personally am curious about the fin efficiency because I stumbled upon it in a book I had and figured it would contribute something to the overall heat coefficient.
 
HethensEnd25 said:
A typical anemometer reading from our experiment showed the inlet and outlet flow ranging from 1200-1600 GPM
Are you certain about units in GPM? An anemometer measures air velocity.

Edit: 310.7 pounds/sec of air mass flow works out to 3884 cubic foot/second (233025 CFM) at 0.08 pounds per cubic foot. Heat exchanger air area (not figuring for the reduction of open area by the fins and piping) is 0.62 m^2 (6.67 sq.ft). This yields an air velocity of 34936 FPM; an air speed of 397 MPH doesn't seem likely.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K