Final velocity parallel to the track when the ski jumper lands

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the final velocity of a ski jumper parallel to the track upon landing, with initial conditions provided, including an initial speed of 10 m/s. Participants are exploring the calculations and components of velocity involved in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various attempts to calculate the final velocity, including the use of time and angles. There are questions about the correct interpretation of horizontal and vertical components of velocity, as well as confusion regarding the terms used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on breaking down the velocity into components and checking calculations. There is ongoing exploration of different methods to derive related quantities, such as tangential acceleration and curvature, with no explicit consensus reached on the final values.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the terminology and calculations involved, particularly regarding the distinction between tangential velocity and acceleration. There are also references to specific numerical values that vary among participants, indicating a need for clarification on the calculations being discussed.

KeevKK
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2017-11-25_0-44-30.png

The skier leaves with 10 m/s
What is the final velocity parallel to the track when it is hit?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I have already found out d which is 21,27m and the time for the movement which is 1.6s.
I can also find the impact velocity, but how am I supposed to find the impact velocity parallel to the track?

I am sure that the solution is simple but I just have some conflicting thoughts regarding the method of finding it.

Thank you!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-25_0-44-30.png
    upload_2017-11-25_0-44-30.png
    13.1 KB · Views: 855
Physics news on Phys.org
KeevKK said:
I am sure that the solution is simple but I just have some conflicting thoughts regarding the method of finding it.
And you need to share those thoughts with us so we can advise you about them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
Okay sure.

These are my attempts:
upload_2017-11-25_11-21-15.png

In the first attempt i would know at what time the skier is 45 degrees and then I would put into the Vy equation, but it does not make sense to me since the movement is 1,6 seconds.

That is why I did the second attempt. But I am not sure if this is correct.

What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-25_11-21-15.png
    upload_2017-11-25_11-21-15.png
    111.2 KB · Views: 362
You got about the right answer, but there is an easier way. Having found the horizontal and vertical components, find how much each of those contributes to velocity parallel to the plane and add them.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
Thank you! So you are saying that 20,15m/s is correct?

English is not my first language so I find it a little difficult to understand what you are saying.

When you say horizontal and vertical components you mean Vx and Vy right? And not Vxo and Vyo? I am a little confused of how to go about your easier solution.
 
KeevKK said:
20,15m/s is correct?
I get slightly more.
KeevKK said:
Vx and Vy right?
Yes. What is the component of each of those parallel to the slope?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
What numbers did you use?

But I think I got it:
upload_2017-11-25_13-7-46.png

I still get 20,15m/s

Thanks a lot!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-25_13-7-46.png
    upload_2017-11-25_13-7-46.png
    86.4 KB · Views: 341
I have a additional question for this problem. How do I derive a function for the curve when only Vinitial=10m/s is known?

Edit: Never mind, I solved it!:)
 
Last edited:
Yet another question:

What if I want to find the center of curvature??

My thoughts are these: First use the formula Vf=Vi+a*t to find the tangential acceleration.
Then use this formula a^2=an^2+at^2 to find an which I will then use in the formula an=(v^2)/r in order to find r.

Is this the right method??
Thanks!
 
  • #10
KeevKK said:
I still get 20,15m/s
You seem to be quoting too many digits given the working along the way. Keep one more digit, at least, throughout the calculation than you intend to quote in the answer.
I did my own calc a bit more accurately and now get slightly under 20.
KeevKK said:
Vf=Vi+a*t to find the tangential acceleration.
I do not understand how that will give tangential acceleration.
You lnow the acceleration vector at any time. Just find the velocity direction and take the component of acceleration that is normal to it to get the radial acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
  • #11
I intented to isolate a in the equation.

To find the center of curvature when t=0.9 I have done the following so far:
upload_2017-11-26_12-55-19.png

Then I found the velocity to be 15,431.

But is that my tangential acceleration as well?

I know the acceleration is 9.8m/s^2 but I am unsure what to do next.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-26_12-55-19.png
    upload_2017-11-26_12-55-19.png
    26.8 KB · Views: 787
  • #12
KeevKK said:
I intented to isolate a in the equation.

To find the center of curvature when t=0.9 I have done the following so far:
View attachment 215639
Then I found the velocity to be 15,431.

But is that my tangential acceleration as well?

I know the acceleration is 9.8m/s^2 but I am unsure what to do next.
You found the tangential velocity, not acceleration. Maybe that is what you meant.
Find the direction of the velocity and determine the component of the acceleration that is orthogonal to it. That is your radial acceleration.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
  • #13
Thanks a lot for your help!

I have tried this:
upload_2017-11-27_13-51-39.png

What do you think?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-27_13-51-13.png
    upload_2017-11-27_13-51-13.png
    120.8 KB · Views: 505
  • upload_2017-11-27_13-51-39.png
    upload_2017-11-27_13-51-39.png
    82.1 KB · Views: 769
  • #14
KeevKK said:
Thanks a lot for your help!

I have tried this:
View attachment 215695
What do you think?
I don't understand... in post #11 you had a vertical velocity of -12,24, but here seem to have used -5,39.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KeevKK
  • #15
You are correct. I made a mistake. But was my approach correct?
 
  • #16
Got this instead after correction:
upload_2017-11-27_21-43-43.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-27_21-43-43.png
    upload_2017-11-27_21-43-43.png
    76.2 KB · Views: 319
  • #17
upload_2017-11-28_20-31-34.png

This is the end result. Anyone care to confirm? :)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-11-28_20-31-34.png
    upload_2017-11-28_20-31-34.png
    37.7 KB · Views: 333

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K