MHB Find A,B,C for Factorial Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter solakis1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial
AI Thread Summary
To solve the factorial equation ABC = A! + B! + C!, it is established that A, B, and C cannot be 7 or higher, as their factorials exceed three-digit numbers. The discussion emphasizes the need for a systematic approach using the properties of factorials and the constraints of three-digit products. Participants inquire about the specific theorems, definitions, or axioms applicable to the problem, indicating a desire for a rigorous mathematical framework. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding factorial growth rates in finding suitable values for A, B, and C. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the mathematical principles involved in solving the equation.
solakis1
Messages
407
Reaction score
0
find A,B,C such that:

ABC= A!+B!+C!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hint
[sp] since 7!= 7x6x5x4x3x2x1=5040 none of the A,B,C CAN be 7,8,9 because 5040 is a 4 digit no and we are looking for a 3 digit no[/sp]
 
Because this is a 3 digit number each digit shall be < 7 as 7! is a 4 digit number that is 5040
Now no digit can be 6 because 6! = 720 so abc >700 so aother digit becomes 7
Largest digit has be 5 because if largest digit is 4 or more we have $ABC \le 72( 3 * 4!)$
So one digit is 5
Now 5!= 120
2 digits cannot be 5 because 5! + 5! = 240 and one dgit has to be 2 and it does not satisfy.
So we have 1 digit 5 and anothee digit A = 1.
B cannot be 5 because then largest C is 4 and sum <= 145 but b =5 makes abc > 150
So C is 5 and we have 100 + 10 * B + 5 = 1 + B! + 120 $ but tying different values B = 4 so number 145
 
kaliprasad said:
Because this is a 3 digit number each digit shall be < 7 as 7! is a 4 digit number that is 5040
Now no digit can be 6 because 6! = 720 so abc >700 so aother digit becomes 7
Largest digit has be 5 because if largest digit is 4 or more we have $ABC \le 72( 3 * 4!)$
So one digit is 5
Now 5!= 120
2 digits cannot be 5 because 5! + 5! = 240 and one dgit has to be 2 and it does not satisfy.
So we have 1 digit 5 and anothee digit A = 1.
B cannot be 5 because then largest C is 4 and sum <= 145 but b =5 makes abc > 150
So C is 5 and we have 100 + 10 * B + 5 = 1 + B! + 120 $ but tying different values B = 4 so number 145
very good but can you explicity mention which are the theorem ,definitions or axiom used to solve the above?
 
solakis said:
very good but can you explicity mention which are the theorem ,definitions or axiom used to solve the above?
I have used the properties of factorial and positional value of numbers . other than that if you want what explicit prpoperties I have used it is nothing.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top