Find angles such that the motion travels a specific distance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a projectile motion problem involving angles and distances. The initial equation for time is derived from the motion of water in a parabola, but the user encounters discrepancies in the results for angles. Clarifications are made regarding the correct use of symbols for angle and distance, emphasizing the importance of consistent notation. The correct relationships between the components of velocity and time are highlighted, leading to the conclusion that the user's results are indeed valid. The conversation concludes with a resolution on formatting issues related to mathematical expressions.
BurpHa
Messages
47
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
A fire hose held near the ground shoots water at a
speed of 6.5 m / s. At what angle(s) should the nozzle point
in order that the water land 2.5 m away?
Relevant Equations
X = V0 * t + 1/2at^2. t = 2V0y / 9.8
We know the time it takes the water complete the whole parabola is (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8.

So I come up with (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5, because the x component of the velocity is the same for the whole time.

But I get the results like these: x≈0.30929171+πn,1.26150461+πn.

I see the correct results are x=72.27889027+180n,17.72110972+180nx

When I use t = 2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5 and plug it in 0 = sin(x) * 6.5 * (2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5) - 4.9 * (2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5) ^ 2, I get the desired results.

I don't know what is not right in (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5 that gets me wrong.
 

Attachments

  • OKUntitled.png
    OKUntitled.png
    60.1 KB · Views: 131
Physics news on Phys.org
BurpHa said:
But I get the results like these: x≈0.30929171+πn,1.26150461+πn.

I see the correct results are x=72.27889027+180n,17.72110972+180nx
The first above is in radians while the lower is in degrees.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
Hello @BurpHa ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

For starters: don't use the symbol ##x## for angle AND for distance. It will cost you dearly sooner or later.
(especially if the exercise text already has a symbol ##\theta_0## for the angle !)

In your relevant equations you have a ##V_0##. What is it ? Aha, after a long :wink: study, I deduce that the second one is Not ##V_0\,y## but ##V_{0,y}##, a.k.a. ##V_0\sin\theta_0##. Did I conclude correctly ?

And you know ##t = 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g## is the time, which can be inserted in ##x = V_{0,x} \, t ##. Where ##V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta_0##.

One equation with one unknown.

Your results make no sense to me. Way too many digits and you want to restrict them to ##0<\theta_0<{\pi\over 2}##

Re
BurpHa said:
I don't know what is not right in (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5 that gets me wrong.
Well, it can't be right, because the dimensions left and right are different !
[edit ] Oops, I think goofed here (imagined brackets :nb))
[edit2]Actually, the expression is quite correct and indeed, ## 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g \,V_0 \cos\theta_0 ## is really 2.5 m.
So it must be going off the rails somewhere in your path to solve that for ##\theta_0##.
What are your steps ?

[edit3]Ah, I see. What a mess. All because of chaotic symbol use!

You have ##y = V_{0,y} t + {1\over 2} gt^2## and solve for ##y=0##, from which ##t = 2V_{0,y}/g##.
For ##x## you have ##x=V_{0,x}t = V_{0,x}\,2V_{0,y}/g = 2V_0^2/g \cos\theta_0\sin\theta_0##.

Solving for ##\theta_0##: ##\sin(2\theta_0) = xg/V_0^2 \Rightarrow 2\theta_0 = 0.618 \ \text {or} \ 2\theta_0 = \pi - 0.618##.

The former gives your ##\theta_0 = 0.309## which is correct (!) and the latter yields your ##\theta_0 = 1.26 ## which is also correct.

In short: well done and on to the next exercise :smile: !


##\ ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and topsquark
BvU said:
Hello @BurpHa ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

For starters: don't use the symbol ##x## for angle AND for distance. It will cost you dearly sooner or later.
(especially if the exercise text already has a symbol ##\theta_0## for the angle !)

In your relevant equations you have a ##V_0##. What is it ? Aha, after a long :wink: study, I deduce that the second one is Not ##V_0\,y## but ##V_{0,y}##, a.k.a. ##V_0\sin\theta_0##. Did I conclude correctly ?

And you know ##t = 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g## is the time, which can be inserted in ##x = V_{0,x} \, t ##. Where ##V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta_0##.

One equation with one unknown.

Your results make no sense to me. Way too many digits and you want to restrict them to ##0<\theta_0<{\pi\over 2}##

Re

Well, it can't be right, because the dimensions left and right are different !
[edit ] Oops, I think goofed here (imagined brackets :nb))
[edit2]Actually, the expression is quite correct and indeed, ## 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g \,V_0 \cos\theta_0 ## is really 2.5 m.
So it must be going off the rails somewhere in your path to solve that for ##\theta_0##.
What are your steps ?

[edit3]Ah, I see. What a mess. All because of chaotic symbol use!

You have ##y = V_{0,y} t + {1\over 2} gt^2## and solve for ##y=0##, from which ##t = 2V_{0,y}/g##.
For ##x## you have ##x=V_{0,x}t = V_{0,x}\,2V_{0,y}/g = 2V_0^2/g \cos\theta_0\sin\theta_0##.

Solving for ##\theta_0##: ##\sin(2\theta_0) = xg/V_0^2 \Rightarrow 2\theta_0 = 0.618 \ \text {or} \ 2\theta_0 = \pi - 0.618##.

The former gives your ##\theta_0 = 0.309## which is correct (!) and the latter yields your ##\theta_0 = 1.26 ## which is also correct.

In short: well done and on to the next exercise :smile: !


##\ ##
Hi,

First of all, let me thank you for your effort.
However, why I only see a bunch of hashtags in your response? I suppose it creates some formatting, but I can't see it, and does it apply to other people too? Do I need to include hashtags in my equations later on?
 
DrClaude said:
The first above is in radians while the lower is in degrees.
Thank you for helping me out! I was telling my calculator to give results in degrees, but it keeps displaying those numbers ;)
 
BurpHa said:
Hi,

First of all, let me thank you for your effort for helping me.
BurpHa said:
However, why I only see a bunch of hashtags and weird use of slashing in your response? I suppose it creates some formatting, but I can't see it, and does it apply to other people too? Do I need to include hashtags and slashing in my equations later on?
 
BurpHa said:
why I only see a bunch of hashtags
That is strange. The MathJax gizmo is supposed to transmogrificate the hashtag-delimited ##\LaTeX## stuff to a presentation like

1666865805660.png


Do you get tohse hashtags in other threads too ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
That is strange. The MathJax gizmo is supposed to transmogrificate the hashtag-delimited ##\LaTeX## stuff to a presentation like

View attachment 316193

Do you get tohse hashtags in other threads too ?

##\ ##
Now I could see your beautifully formatted text after refreshing my browser several times. Could you tell me how could you do that? Actually, before posting this question, I was looking for the formatting options but could not find it.
 
There is a ##\LaTeX## guide button to the lower left of the edit window...

1666866395849.png
 
  • #10
BvU said:
There is a ##\LaTeX## guide button to the lower left of the edit window...

View attachment 316195
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes BvU
  • #11
Have fun !

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes BurpHa
Back
Top