Find angles such that the motion travels a specific distance

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding angles for projectile motion that result in a specific horizontal distance traveled. The subject area includes kinematics and trigonometry, particularly focusing on the relationships between angle, distance, and time in projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equations governing projectile motion, including the time of flight and the components of velocity. There are attempts to derive the angle from given distances and time, with some questioning the use of symbols and the dimensional consistency of equations.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in clarifying the equations and symbols used, with some providing insights into the relationships between the variables involved. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in calculations and interpretations, but no consensus has been reached on the final approach to solving for the angle.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of distinguishing between radians and degrees in their calculations, as well as the need for clarity in variable representation to avoid confusion. There are also mentions of formatting issues related to mathematical expressions in the forum.

BurpHa
Messages
47
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
A fire hose held near the ground shoots water at a
speed of 6.5 m / s. At what angle(s) should the nozzle point
in order that the water land 2.5 m away?
Relevant Equations
X = V0 * t + 1/2at^2. t = 2V0y / 9.8
We know the time it takes the water complete the whole parabola is (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8.

So I come up with (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5, because the x component of the velocity is the same for the whole time.

But I get the results like these: x≈0.30929171+πn,1.26150461+πn.

I see the correct results are x=72.27889027+180n,17.72110972+180nx

When I use t = 2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5 and plug it in 0 = sin(x) * 6.5 * (2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5) - 4.9 * (2.5 / cos(x) * 6.5) ^ 2, I get the desired results.

I don't know what is not right in (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5 that gets me wrong.
 

Attachments

  • OKUntitled.png
    OKUntitled.png
    60.1 KB · Views: 151
Physics news on Phys.org
BurpHa said:
But I get the results like these: x≈0.30929171+πn,1.26150461+πn.

I see the correct results are x=72.27889027+180n,17.72110972+180nx
The first above is in radians while the lower is in degrees.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: topsquark
Hello @BurpHa ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

For starters: don't use the symbol ##x## for angle AND for distance. It will cost you dearly sooner or later.
(especially if the exercise text already has a symbol ##\theta_0## for the angle !)

In your relevant equations you have a ##V_0##. What is it ? Aha, after a long :wink: study, I deduce that the second one is Not ##V_0\,y## but ##V_{0,y}##, a.k.a. ##V_0\sin\theta_0##. Did I conclude correctly ?

And you know ##t = 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g## is the time, which can be inserted in ##x = V_{0,x} \, t ##. Where ##V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta_0##.

One equation with one unknown.

Your results make no sense to me. Way too many digits and you want to restrict them to ##0<\theta_0<{\pi\over 2}##

Re
BurpHa said:
I don't know what is not right in (sin(x) * 6.5 * 2) / 9.8 * cos(x) * 6.5 = 2.5 that gets me wrong.
Well, it can't be right, because the dimensions left and right are different !
[edit ] Oops, I think goofed here (imagined brackets :nb))
[edit2]Actually, the expression is quite correct and indeed, ## 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g \,V_0 \cos\theta_0 ## is really 2.5 m.
So it must be going off the rails somewhere in your path to solve that for ##\theta_0##.
What are your steps ?

[edit3]Ah, I see. What a mess. All because of chaotic symbol use!

You have ##y = V_{0,y} t + {1\over 2} gt^2## and solve for ##y=0##, from which ##t = 2V_{0,y}/g##.
For ##x## you have ##x=V_{0,x}t = V_{0,x}\,2V_{0,y}/g = 2V_0^2/g \cos\theta_0\sin\theta_0##.

Solving for ##\theta_0##: ##\sin(2\theta_0) = xg/V_0^2 \Rightarrow 2\theta_0 = 0.618 \ \text {or} \ 2\theta_0 = \pi - 0.618##.

The former gives your ##\theta_0 = 0.309## which is correct (!) and the latter yields your ##\theta_0 = 1.26 ## which is also correct.

In short: well done and on to the next exercise :smile: !


##\ ##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude and topsquark
BvU said:
Hello @BurpHa ,
:welcome: ##\qquad## !​

For starters: don't use the symbol ##x## for angle AND for distance. It will cost you dearly sooner or later.
(especially if the exercise text already has a symbol ##\theta_0## for the angle !)

In your relevant equations you have a ##V_0##. What is it ? Aha, after a long :wink: study, I deduce that the second one is Not ##V_0\,y## but ##V_{0,y}##, a.k.a. ##V_0\sin\theta_0##. Did I conclude correctly ?

And you know ##t = 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g## is the time, which can be inserted in ##x = V_{0,x} \, t ##. Where ##V_{0,x} = V_0 \cos\theta_0##.

One equation with one unknown.

Your results make no sense to me. Way too many digits and you want to restrict them to ##0<\theta_0<{\pi\over 2}##

Re

Well, it can't be right, because the dimensions left and right are different !
[edit ] Oops, I think goofed here (imagined brackets :nb))
[edit2]Actually, the expression is quite correct and indeed, ## 2\, V_0\sin\theta_0 /g \,V_0 \cos\theta_0 ## is really 2.5 m.
So it must be going off the rails somewhere in your path to solve that for ##\theta_0##.
What are your steps ?

[edit3]Ah, I see. What a mess. All because of chaotic symbol use!

You have ##y = V_{0,y} t + {1\over 2} gt^2## and solve for ##y=0##, from which ##t = 2V_{0,y}/g##.
For ##x## you have ##x=V_{0,x}t = V_{0,x}\,2V_{0,y}/g = 2V_0^2/g \cos\theta_0\sin\theta_0##.

Solving for ##\theta_0##: ##\sin(2\theta_0) = xg/V_0^2 \Rightarrow 2\theta_0 = 0.618 \ \text {or} \ 2\theta_0 = \pi - 0.618##.

The former gives your ##\theta_0 = 0.309## which is correct (!) and the latter yields your ##\theta_0 = 1.26 ## which is also correct.

In short: well done and on to the next exercise :smile: !


##\ ##
Hi,

First of all, let me thank you for your effort.
However, why I only see a bunch of hashtags in your response? I suppose it creates some formatting, but I can't see it, and does it apply to other people too? Do I need to include hashtags in my equations later on?
 
DrClaude said:
The first above is in radians while the lower is in degrees.
Thank you for helping me out! I was telling my calculator to give results in degrees, but it keeps displaying those numbers ;)
 
BurpHa said:
Hi,

First of all, let me thank you for your effort for helping me.
BurpHa said:
However, why I only see a bunch of hashtags and weird use of slashing in your response? I suppose it creates some formatting, but I can't see it, and does it apply to other people too? Do I need to include hashtags and slashing in my equations later on?
 
BurpHa said:
why I only see a bunch of hashtags
That is strange. The MathJax gizmo is supposed to transmogrificate the hashtag-delimited ##\LaTeX## stuff to a presentation like

1666865805660.png


Do you get tohse hashtags in other threads too ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
That is strange. The MathJax gizmo is supposed to transmogrificate the hashtag-delimited ##\LaTeX## stuff to a presentation like

View attachment 316193

Do you get tohse hashtags in other threads too ?

##\ ##
Now I could see your beautifully formatted text after refreshing my browser several times. Could you tell me how could you do that? Actually, before posting this question, I was looking for the formatting options but could not find it.
 
There is a ##\LaTeX## guide button to the lower left of the edit window...

1666866395849.png
 
  • #10
BvU said:
There is a ##\LaTeX## guide button to the lower left of the edit window...

View attachment 316195
Thank you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #11
Have fun !

:smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BurpHa

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K