MHB Find Area of A Rectangle With Shortcut

  • Thread starter Thread starter susanto3311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Rectangle
susanto3311
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
hi all...

how do you find area of a rectangle, if its perimeter of a rectangle is = 72 cm?

i mean how to easy find it without hard work.

do you have a formula or just tricks similar like..

http://calculus-geometry.hubpages.com/hub/How-to-Find-the-Area-Perimeter-and-Diagonal-of-a-Rectangle

thanks in advance...

susanto
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For a given perimeter, there are an infinite number of rectangles that will have that perimeter. We need more information about the rectangle.
 
MarkFL said:
For a given perimeter, there are an infinite number of rectangles that will have that perimeter. We need more information about the rectangle.

if perimeter of a rectangle is = 72 cm, counting area of a rectangle =...

i need simple formula to calculate it.
possible?
 
Well, suppose we let the height $0<h<36$ be a free variable, then the base $b$ is $b=36-h$. Thus the area $A$ is:

$$A=bh=(36-h)h$$

Thus we find:

$$0<A\le324$$
 
The sum of the base and the height must be equal to the semi-perimeter, which is 36...half of 72. And the maximum area comes from the base and height being equal. So the upper bound is $18^2=324$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top