MIN/MAX area of a rectangle inscribed in a rectangle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum and maximum area of a rectangle that can be inscribed within another rectangle, defined by specific width and height. Participants explore the conditions under which such an inscribed rectangle can exist and the implications of its dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Debate/contested, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how to create a formula for finding the minimum and maximum area of an inscribed rectangle, questioning whether it is possible to inscribe a rectangle at all.
  • Another participant suggests that the maximum area occurs when the inscribed rectangle and the outer rectangle are identical, while the minimum area is when the sides of the inscribed rectangle are reduced to zero length.
  • A further reply clarifies that if all sides of the inscribed rectangle are zero length, it ceases to be a rectangle, implying that the minimum area could be considered as approaching zero rather than being defined.
  • Another participant defines an inscribed rectangle as one where all four vertices touch the outer rectangle, asserting that the outer rectangle represents the maximum area and suggesting that the minimum area could be a degenerate case with area zero.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition of an inscribed rectangle and the implications for minimum area, with some suggesting a degenerate case while others argue about the nature of area approaching zero. There is no consensus on the conditions or definitions surrounding the minimum area.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the definitions of inscribed rectangles and the nature of area, which may not be universally agreed upon. The implications of zero-length sides and the concept of degeneracy in geometric terms remain unresolved.

nencho83
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
http://bp3.blogger.com/_4Z2DKqKRYUc/Rnz_BgODzFI/AAAAAAAAAIw/uj_cVfPI8D4/s1600-h/Img_6-23-07_Blog.jpg

Could someone help me to understand how can I figure it out, how can I create a formula for finding min/max area of a rectangle inscribed in a rectangle, defined by given width and height. Also if it is possible to be inscribed a rectangle at all.

For a private case, when the rectangle is a square, it is pretty easy using the Pythagorean theorem, but for a common case I'm not sure if the inscribed rectangle is really inscribed.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The maximum area is when the inside rectangle and the outside rectangle overlap and and have the same area. The minimum area is when all of the sides of the inside rectangle are length zero.

Is this your question?
 
Hertz said:
The maximum area is when the inside rectangle and the outside rectangle overlap and and have the same area. The minimum area is when all of the sides of the inside rectangle are length zero.

Is this your question?
When all the sides are zero length,then it is no longer a rectangle.It's just nothing.Smallest area is when you make the width,infinitely close to zero,(I mean,0.000000001,like this,you can write infinite zeros and then 1.)
 
I assume that a rectangle is inscribed in another only all four vertices of the inscribed rectangle touch the outer rectangle. So the outer rectangle itself is the largest and there is either no minimum or a degenerate rectangle having area 0 for the min.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K