Find Area Under Curve y=x^3 from 0 to 1: Riemann Sum Limit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the area under the curve defined by the function y=x^3 from 0 to 1 using Riemann sums and limits. Participants are exploring the application of summation formulas and the definition of integrals in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of the limit for the area under the curve, with some attempting to express it using the sum of cubes. Questions arise regarding the proper application of summation formulas and the transition between different forms of the limit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing guidance on algebraic manipulation and clarifying misunderstandings about notation and summation. There is recognition of potential mistakes in earlier posts, and some participants express a desire to learn more about summation rules.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion regarding the clarity of the original problem statement and the notation used in the expressions. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clearer communication in mathematical writing.

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


a.) Use definition 2 to find an expression for the area under the curve y=x^3 from 0 to 1 as a limit.
b.)Evaluate the (above) limit using the sum of the cubes of the n integers.

Homework Equations


[tex](\frac{n(n+1)}{2})^{2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a.) I wrote my limit like this:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \Sigma_{i=1}^{n}(\frac{i}{n})^{3}\frac{1}{n}[/tex]The "Definition 2" they have listed just says:
[tex]A=\lim_{n \to \infty} R_{n} = \lim_{n \to \infty}(f(x_{1})\Delta x + f(x_{2})\Delta x + . . . + f(x_{n})\Delta x)[/tex]

Now for part b, I understand that the formula is the sum of all cubes and so on. So I am thinking that the limit should look like this?

[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}(\frac{n(n+1)}{2})^{2}[/tex]
That should handle the limit and the sum of cubes, now I need each one to multiply by delta x right? So that it comes out to:
[tex]\lim_{n \to \infty}(\frac{n(n+1)}{2})^{2}\frac{1}{n}[/tex]
..because the integral is from 0 to 1, so [itex]\Delta x = \frac{1-0}{n}[/itex]

But I am not sure how to write it in this manner and take the limit from here yet. Is this correct so far? I should just simplify the expression after the limit and then take the limit?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No, no. The sum of i^3 for i=0 to n is (n(n+1)/2))^2. That's only a PART of the sum of (i/n)^3*(1/n) for i=0 to n. Do some algebra in that sum to separate out the i^3 part and then substitute your summation formula and take the limit.
 
I understand now. Sorry, this is the first time I have ever actually used a summation, other than just knowing what it is.
73p1z5.jpg


I checked with the definite integral and this is correct as far as I can tell.
I'm going to go learn the rules of summation and find some problems to do. Thanks, I didn't realize that this was how it worked.
 
Yes, the integral from x=0 to x=1 is 1/4. And I think you did it correctly through the limit.
 
Thanks for the help!
 
Hey can someone explain to me how did he jumped from lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n to lim n->1/n^4 Ʃ i^3??
 
ScienceGeek24 said:
Hey can someone explain to me how did he jumped from lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n to lim n->1/n^4 Ʃ i^3??

He didn't jump anywhere. He used a formula the sum of i^3 for i=1 to n.
 
I see... but he committed a mistake in the evaluation at lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n is not lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n is lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n^3 * 1/n
 
I was having a hard time finding how did he got that 1/n^4... LOL it was an ibvious mistake from part (a) even part (a) is wrong.
 
  • #10
deltax= 1-0/n=1/n than according to definition 2 the R endpoints formula is (a+ideltax)deltax so is i/n*1/n than substituting from x^3 we have (i/n)^3*1/n=i^3/n^3*1/n=i^3/n^4 which makes more sense. Now i just get rid of the 1/n^4 and put it in the other side of the summation and ta chan! problem solved LOL
 
  • #11
ScienceGeek24 said:
I see... but he committed a mistake in the evaluation at lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n is not lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n * 1/n is lim n-> Ʃ i^3/n^3 * 1/n

It's pretty clear he meant (i/n)^3 not i^3/n since the n^4 appears in the next line. Why are you resurrecting posts over to a year old to complain about notational mistakes?
 
  • #12
is not clear in part (a).
 
  • #13
ScienceGeek24 said:
is not clear in part (a).

I'll admit the way it was written isn't clear. Using an extra parentheses would have helped.
 
  • #14
Dick said:
I'll admit the way it was written isn't clear. Using an extra parentheses would have helped.

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K