Find dissipative function for the non-linear force f=-bv^n

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the dissipative function for the non-linear force f = -bv^n in a Lagrangian framework. It is established that the dissipative function can be expressed as D = - (1/(n+1))bv^(1+n). There is clarification regarding the relationship between the force and the dissipative function, correcting a typo in the initial query. Participants confirm the correctness of the derived dissipative function. The conversation emphasizes the importance of accurately relating force and dissipative functions in nonconservative systems.
mcconnellmelany
Messages
21
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
For a nonconservative force,
What would be the dissipative function for a force f=-bvⁿ in Lagrangian
(Where v is the velocity)
[#qoute for a nonconservative force f=-bv
The dissipative function is D=-(1/2)bv² ]
Relevant Equations
##\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot x})=\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} - \frac{\partial F}{\partial \dot x}##
For a nonconservative force,
What would be the dissipative function for a force f=-bvⁿ in Lagrangian
(Where v is the velocity)
[#qoute for a nonconservative force f=-bv
The dissipative function is D=-(1/2)bv² ]

Since ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## so the dissipative function should be ##D=-\frac{1}{n+1}bv^{1+n}##, isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mcconnellmelany said:
Since ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \ddot x}##
Do you mean ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## ?
 
haruspex said:
Do you mean ##f=\frac{\partial D}{\partial \dot x}## ?
Hmm! It was a typo.
 
mcconnellmelany said:
Hmm! It was a typo.
Your answer looks right to me.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top