Find Final Image Location & Magnification in Lens Combination 21

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combination Lens
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the final image location and total magnification in a system of two converging lenses, each with a focal length of 25 cm, positioned 16.5 cm apart. An object is placed 35 cm in front of the first lens, resulting in a virtual object for the second lens with a negative object distance. Using the thin lens equation, the final image distance is calculated to be 0.1848 m, indicating that the final image is located to the right of the second lens. The conversation also clarifies that a positive image distance corresponds to a real image, while a negative distance indicates a virtual image.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the thin lens equation
  • Knowledge of focal lengths and image distances
  • Familiarity with the concepts of real and virtual images
  • Ability to construct ray diagrams for lens systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the thin lens equation in detail
  • Learn how to analyze lens combinations and their effects on image formation
  • Explore ray diagram techniques for multiple lens systems
  • Investigate the principles of magnification in optical systems
USEFUL FOR

Optics students, physics educators, and anyone interested in understanding lens systems and image formation in optical devices.

Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
21. Two 25cm focal length converging lenses are placed 16.5cm apart. An object is placed 35cm in front of one lens. Where will the final image formed by the second lens be located? What is the total magnification?

HERE IS WHAT I NEED CHECKED. Because the image formed by the first lens is on the opposite side of the second lens from where the light is emanating (right side of second lens), I give the new object distance for the second lens a negative sign. Plugging those numbers into the thin lens equation, I get an image distance of .1848 m. This has a positive sign because it is on the opposite side from where the light is originally emanating.

21.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Shackleford,

Shackleford said:
HERE IS WHAT I NEED CHECKED. Because the image formed by the first lens is on the opposite side of the second lens from where the light is emanating (right side of second lens), I give the new object distance for the second lens a negative sign.

Yes, that's right; it will be a virtual object and the object distance for the second lens will be negative.

Plugging those numbers into the thin lens equation, I get an image distance of .1848 m. This has a positive sign because it is on the opposite side from where the light is originally emanating.

Yes, a positive image distance for the final lens means here that the final image will be to the right of the second lens.
 
alphysicist said:
Hi Shackleford,
Yes, that's right; it will be a virtual object and the object distance for the second lens will be negative.
Yes, a positive image distance for the final lens means here that the final image will be to the right of the second lens.

The book says image distance is positive for a real image and negative for a virtual image. The image distance for the first lens is positive. Wouldn't that make it a real image since the rays do pass through the point? The image distance is also positive for the second lens.

How do you draw the ray diagram to get everything in its proper analytical spot? I think incorporating the second lens is confusing me a bit in this regard.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K