MHB Find Fourier series of Dirac delta function

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around expanding the Dirac delta function, δ(x-t), as a Fourier series despite its non-periodicity. Participants clarify that the Fourier series expansion is valid only within the interval of -π to π, and the integral properties of the Dirac delta function are crucial for finding coefficients a₀ and aₙ. The correct approach involves integrating with respect to a dummy variable, leading to the results a₀ = 1/π and aₙ = 1/π cos(nt). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the properties of the Dirac delta function in Fourier analysis. Ultimately, the participants confirm the validity of their calculations and the method of substitution used in the expansion.
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi - firstly should I be concerned that the dirac function is NOT periodic?

Either way the problem says expand $\delta(x-t)$ as a Fourier series...

I tried $\delta(x-t) = 1, x=t; \delta(x-t) =0, x \ne t , -\pi \le t \le \pi$ ... ('1' still delivers the value of a multiplied function at t)

from there I tried $a_0 = \lim_{{\in}\to{0}}\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{t-\in}^{t+\in}1 \,dx $, but that's not going to give the answer in the book ($\frac{1}{2\pi} +\frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} Cosn(x-t)$)

A hint on how to start this please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ognik said:
Hi - firstly should I be concerned that the dirac function is NOT periodic?

Either way the problem says expand $\delta(x-t)$ as a Fourier series...

I tried $\delta(x-t) = 1, x=t; \delta(x-t) =0, x \ne t , -\pi \le t \le \pi$ ... ('1' still delivers the value of a multiplied function at t)

from there I tried $a_0 = \lim_{{\in}\to{0}}\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{t-\in}^{t+\in}1 \,dx $, but that's not going to give the answer in the book ($\frac{1}{2\pi} +\frac{1}{\pi} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} Cosn(x-t)$)

A hint on how to start this please?

Hi ognik,

When we expand a function to a Fourier series, that expansion is only valid between $-\pi$ and $\pi$.
Outside of that interval, we'll get indeed repetitions that don't belong to the dirac function.

Btw, $\delta(x-t) = \infty$ when $x=t$.
Instead we should use the property that $\int_{-\pi}^{\pi} \delta(x-t) f(t)\,dt = f(x)$ if $-\pi < x < \pi$.

So we get:
$$a_0 = \frac 1 \pi \int_{-\pi}^{+\pi} \delta(x-t) \cdot 1 \,dt = \frac 1\pi \cdot 1$$
 
Thanks ILS, I hadn;t encountered that property - is it commonly used?

Dummy variables being something that can confuse me, please would you explain why it wouldn't be the usual $ a_0 = \frac1\pi \int \delta(x-t)f(x)\,dx = f(x)$ ?

Then is $ a_n = \frac 1\pi \int \delta(x-t)Cosnt\,dt = \frac 1\pi Cosnz|^\pi_-{\pi} $ ?
 
ognik said:
Thanks ILS, I hadn;t encountered that property - is it commonly used?

Yes. It is the fundamental property of the dirac function (although I modified it a bit to fit the problem at hand).
See for instance here.

Dummy variables being something that can confuse me, please would you explain why it wouldn't be the usual $ a_0 = \frac1\pi \int \delta(x-t)f(x)\,dx = f(x)$ ?

Then is $ a_n = \frac 1\pi \int \delta(x-t)Cosnt\,dt = \frac 1\pi Cosnz|^\pi_-{\pi} $ ?

When we take an integral, we integrate with respect to some (possibly dummy) variable.
After the integration that variable can no longer be present in the expression - it has been integrated.
In your example $x$ is being integrated, while $t$ is considered to be constant.
The resulting expression is not supposed to contain $x$ any more.

Note that when we write an indeterminate integral like $F(x) = \int f(x)\,dx$, there is an ambiguity in the usage of $x$.
It has 2 different meanings, which is something I recommend avoiding in Fourier analysis.
Properly it should be:
$$F(x) = \int^x f(\tilde x) \,d\tilde x$$
 
Thanks ILS.

Both x and t are variables, so why did you integrate w.r.t. t?

And please check my $a_n$ in my previous post - comparing with the book it looks wrong, but I can't see why?
 
ognik said:
Thanks ILS.

Both x and t are variables, so why did you integrate w.r.t. t?

And please check my $a_n$ in my previous post - comparing with the book it looks wrong, but I can't see why?

Your problem statement is actually rather confusing as to which variable we should integrate ($x$ or $t$).
Looking at the answer, I think it's neither $x$ nor $t$, but we should expand $\delta(y)$ instead, and afterwards substitute $y=x-t$.
 
Hi ILS, I believe I have it:
Your link shows everything we need, the property should be $ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta \left(x-t\right) \,dx = f(t)$

$a_0 =\frac{1}{\pi}$ is still correct

But $a_n= \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \delta \left(x-t\right) cos nx \,dx = \frac{1}{\pi}cos nt $ and similarly $b_n= \frac{1}{\pi}sin nt $

Then $ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\delta \left(x-t\right) \,dx = \frac{1}{2\pi} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left( Cosnt Cos nx +Sinnt Sin nx \right) = \frac{1}{2\pi} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} Cosn(x-t) $
 
Ah okay, it works like that as well.
 
I like Serena said:
Ah okay, it works like that as well.
Thanks again ILS - and I also got it using your suggested substitution :-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K