Find FT of Function: Solution & Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Fourier Transform (FT) of a given function, with participants exploring the properties of the delta function and integration techniques in the context of Fourier analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the integration of exponential functions and the properties of the delta function. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the original poster's approach and the implications of the inverse Fourier Transform.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants questioning the validity of the original poster's conclusions and suggesting that there may be misunderstandings regarding the properties of the delta function and integration. There is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining the implications of integrating over different ranges and the relationship between the delta function and Fourier transforms. There is a focus on ensuring that assumptions about the properties of functions and integrals are clearly understood.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
I will post a print
Relevant Equations
.
1620972236138.png

I need to find the FT of this function. Here is my attempt:

$$H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t}dt$$

We know that ##\delta(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2 \pi i f t} df##, the part with sin in this integration vanish, so that, and knowing that cos is a even function, we can write ##\delta(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2 \pi i f t} df = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Now, for example, ##\int_{-a}^{a}x^2 = 2\int_{0}^{a}x^2##. So we can write the delta above as ##\delta(t) = \int_{\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Putting this in the first formula $$H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t}dt$$:

##H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t} dt = k \delta(f) /2##

This make sense or you? Is it right?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Is it right?
One possible check is to do the inverse FT. That would give you a constant function, so: no !
Something got lost on the way...

##\ ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Herculi said:
Now, for example, ##\int_{-a}^{a}x^2 = 2\int_{0}^{a}x^2##. So we can write the delta above as ##\delta(t) = \int_{\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Is
$$
\int_{-a}^a x\, dx = 2 \int_0^a x\, dx?
$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
I think your confusion is they ##\delta(t)## is a thing that needs to be integrated again in order to get the function value. So

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(x) \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2\pi i x t} dt dx= g(0)$$

But
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(x) e^{2\pi i x t} dx \neq g(0)$$

This latter integral is just a multiple of the inverse Fourier transform of g.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K