Find FT of Function: Solution & Explanation

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the Fourier Transform (FT) of a given function, specifically through the integral H(f) = ∫(0 to ∞) ke^(-2πift) dt. The participants explore the properties of the delta function, noting that δ(t) can be expressed as an integral involving exponential functions. There is a debate about the correctness of the transformation, with one participant questioning the outcome of the inverse FT, suggesting that a constant function should result. Clarifications are made regarding the integration of functions involving the delta function, emphasizing the need for proper interpretation of the integrals involved. The conversation highlights the complexities of Fourier analysis and the importance of careful mathematical handling.
LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
I will post a print
Relevant Equations
.
1620972236138.png

I need to find the FT of this function. Here is my attempt:

$$H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t}dt$$

We know that ##\delta(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2 \pi i f t} df##, the part with sin in this integration vanish, so that, and knowing that cos is a even function, we can write ##\delta(t) = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2 \pi i f t} df = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Now, for example, ##\int_{-a}^{a}x^2 = 2\int_{0}^{a}x^2##. So we can write the delta above as ##\delta(t) = \int_{\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Putting this in the first formula $$H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t}dt$$:

##H(f) = \int_{0}^{\infty} ke^{-2 \pi i f t} dt = k \delta(f) /2##

This make sense or you? Is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Is it right?
One possible check is to do the inverse FT. That would give you a constant function, so: no !
Something got lost on the way...

##\ ##
 
Herculi said:
Now, for example, ##\int_{-a}^{a}x^2 = 2\int_{0}^{a}x^2##. So we can write the delta above as ##\delta(t) = \int_{\infty}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df = 2\int_{0}^{\infty} e^{-2 \pi i f t} df##.

Is
$$
\int_{-a}^a x\, dx = 2 \int_0^a x\, dx?
$$
 
I think your confusion is they ##\delta(t)## is a thing that needs to be integrated again in order to get the function value. So

$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(x) \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{2\pi i x t} dt dx= g(0)$$

But
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}g(x) e^{2\pi i x t} dx \neq g(0)$$

This latter integral is just a multiple of the inverse Fourier transform of g.
 
First, I tried to show that ##f_n## converges uniformly on ##[0,2\pi]##, which is true since ##f_n \rightarrow 0## for ##n \rightarrow \infty## and ##\sigma_n=\mathrm{sup}\left| \frac{\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x\right)}{n^{x^2-3x+3}} \right| \leq \frac{1}{|n^{x^2-3x+3}|} \leq \frac{1}{n^{\frac 34}}\rightarrow 0##. I can't use neither Leibnitz's test nor Abel's test. For Dirichlet's test I would need to show, that ##\sin\left(\frac{n^2}{n+\frac 15}x \right)## has partialy bounded sums...