Find h in the problem involving a stone thrown upwards

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    equation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a physics problem involving a stone thrown upwards, where the initial velocity (u) is 16 m/s and gravitational acceleration (g) is -9.8 m/s². Two participants confirm that both their approaches yield the same height (h) of 14.4 m, despite using different sign conventions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of rounding the final answer to two significant figures for consistency with the given data. Both methods are validated as correct, highlighting the flexibility in problem-solving approaches in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematic equations, specifically the SUVAT equations.
  • Familiarity with sign conventions in physics problems.
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion principles.
  • Ability to perform calculations involving acceleration due to gravity.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the SUVAT equations in detail to understand their applications in various scenarios.
  • Learn about different sign conventions in physics and their implications on problem-solving.
  • Explore the concept of significant figures and their importance in scientific calculations.
  • Practice solving projectile motion problems with varying initial velocities and angles.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in mastering projectile motion calculations.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
420
Homework Statement
See attached.
Relevant Equations
kinematics
Was the approach used by the referenced tutor correct?

1729371349877.png



In my understanding, the set up equation ought to be,
##s=-h, u=16## as the stone is being thrown upwards and ##g=-9.8##
giving me,

##-h = 64 - \dfrac{1}{2}×9.8 ×16##

##-h=-14.4##m

##h=14.4##m , or it does not really matter.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your tutor used a sign convention where downwards is positive.
You used a sign convention where upwards is positive.
You both solved the problem correctly and got the same answer.
One approach isn't better than the other IMO.

Edit: technically it would be better to round the final answer to 2 significant figures, for consistency with the given data.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR, DeBangis21 and chwala
Steve4Physics said:
Your tutor used a sign convention where downwards is positive.
You used a sign convention where upwards is positive.
You both solved the problem correctly and got the same answer.
One approach isn't better than the other IMO.

Edit: technically it would be better to round the final answer to 2 significant figures, for consistency with the given data.
Not my tutor though ... the term 'tutor' was in reference to the attached downloaded pdf. Cheers though.
 
For part (b) this is clear,

1729374432048.png


but i can also use,

##v=u + at##

##v= 0 + 9.8(4-1.63265) = 23.2## m/s

I made use of ##\dfrac{ds}{dt}##, just incase the question on ##1.63## comes up.

cheers.
 
chwala said:
For part (b) this is clear,

View attachment 352465

but i can also use,

##v=u + at##

##v= 0 + 9.8(4-1.63265) = 23.2## m/s
Or even:
##v = u + at = 16 + (-9.8) \times 4 =-23.2## m/s
Speed = |v| = 23.2 m/s
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR and chwala
This is a related problem, allow me to post it here rather than start a new post;

1729376883959.png



The steps are clear;

also we could solve it by simultaneous equation, that is by use of velocity and distance formula (suvat), we shall have the simultaneous,

##34=u+10a##

##480=20u+100a##

##u=14## m/s.

cheers, great day.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
19K
Replies
23
Views
3K