Find Her Acceleration (2 ice skaters pushing a 3rd skater)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Austin Gibson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Ice
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration of a skater being pushed by two others, with a focus on the implications of initial motion versus being stationary. The problem is situated within the context of Newton's laws of motion, particularly the application of force and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Exploratory

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether acceleration is influenced by the skater's initial velocity and question the relationship between force and acceleration in different scenarios. Some express confusion about the implications of being in motion versus at rest.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationship between net force and acceleration, with some participants providing insights into Newton's Second Law. While some reasoning has been validated, there is no explicit consensus on the interpretation of the acceleration in the context of the skater's initial motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific values for initial velocity and the assumption that friction is negligible. The discussion also highlights the distinction between different parts of the problem, particularly how the conditions change from being stationary to already moving.

Austin Gibson
Messages
47
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement

:
[/B]
It may be impossible to solve without the picture. Therefore, I linked the picture instead of typing the question.
Link/picture of question: https://gyazo.com/124652a4718764aa0f7e8217c1d3fcbc
upload_2018-10-9_20-12-59.png


I'm stuck on the third question.
The third question is the following: "What is her acceleration assuming she is already moving in the direction of Ftot? Express your answer in vector form."
Notice that I already solved for her acceleration if she was stationary. Also, I'm assuming friction is disregarded because it accepted my previous answer and I disregarded friction in my calculations.

Homework Equations

:
[/B]
F=ma

3. The Attempt at a Solution :


I'm puzzled by the question. If someone could rephrase it or nudge me towards the first step by a question, I'd be grateful. It's already shown in the picture, but I calculated her acceleration to be "a = 0.52i -0.37k" when initially stationary.

 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-10-9_20-12-59.png
    upload_2018-10-9_20-12-59.png
    19 KB · Views: 556
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Does the acceleration depend on the velocity in this case? If so how?
 
kuruman said:
Does the acceleration depend on the velocity in this case? If so how?

Her velocity and acceleration before she's pushed are unlisted, but the net acceleration in the vertical direction is zero (otherwise, she'd be rising or falling through the ice) and, if friction and air resistance are ignored, her acceleration in horizontal before she's pushed is zero too. Therefore, she's traveling at a constant velocity and acceleration is zero. Are the answers identical or am I typing nonsense?
 
Last edited:
Part (c) is a variant of part (b). In part (b) you are asked to find her acceleration if she is initially at rest. You answered that correctly. In part (c) all that has changed from (b) is that she is already moving in the direction of the net force when that net force is applied. The question is, what is her acceleration now? Reason it out.
 
kuruman said:
Part (c) is a variant of part (b). In part (b) you are asked to find her acceleration if she is initially at rest. You answered that correctly. In part (c) all that has changed from (b) is that she is already moving in the direction of the net force when that net force is applied. The question is, what is her acceleration now? Reason it out.
After pondering about it for a few hours, I submitted my answer to (b) in (c) and it accepted it. Is my reasoning justified?
 
Your reasoning is OK, but you could have said better with an equation, the deceptively simple Newton's Second Law, ##\vec F_{net}=m\vec a## which says that if you know the net force, you can find the acceleration and vice versa. Velocity is not part of the picture. Think of a mass in projectile motion: it could be moving in any direction with any velocity, but its acceleration will always be g down and the net force on it (neglecting air resistance) will always be mg down.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Austin Gibson
kuruman said:
Your reasoning is OK, but you could have said better with an equation, the deceptively simple Newton's Second Law, ##\vec F_{net}=m\vec a## which says that if you know the net force, you can find the acceleration and vice versa. Velocity is not part of the picture. Think of a mass in projectile motion: it could be moving in any direction with any velocity, but its acceleration will always be g down and the net force on it (neglecting air resistance) will always be mg down.
I'll ponder that. I was introduced to Newton's laws recently and I'm still contemplating the various implications of them. That equation is simple, but the implications are profound. It's already changing my perception of my environment.
 
The more proficient you become interpreting equations, the deeper your conceptual understanding.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Austin Gibson

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K