Find limit of complex function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the limit of a complex function defined as f(z) = 3xy + i(x - y²) as z approaches 3 + 2i. Participants explore the implications of continuity and the definition of limits in the context of complex analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the ε-δ definition of limits, with attempts to establish bounds for the function as z approaches the specified point. There are considerations of continuity versus holomorphicity, and questions arise regarding the implications of the Cauchy-Riemann equations on the function's behavior.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the limit's behavior, with some participants providing insights into bounding techniques and the relationship between δ and ε. Multiple interpretations of continuity and holomorphicity are being examined, indicating a productive dialogue without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the potential for path dependence in the limit due to the failure of the Cauchy-Riemann equations, raising questions about the function's continuity at the point of interest. The discussion reflects a mix of assumptions and definitions that are still under scrutiny.

looserlama
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let z = x + iy and let f(z) = 3xy + i(x - y2). Find limz→3 + 2i f(z).

Homework Equations



The definition of a limit.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did f(3 + 2i) = 18 - i

It seems pretty clear that it is a continuous function, but I can't prove it.

So I tried using the definition of a limit of a function:

Let ε be a strictly positive real number.

Take |x + iy - 3 -2i| ≤ |x - 3| + |y - 2| < δ

Then, |3xy + i(x - y2) - 18 + i| ≤ |3xy - 18| + |1 + x - y2|

Clearly I need to get to some multiple of |x - 3| + |y - 2| which would give me a relation between δ and ε.
The problem is I can get there. I tried adding and subtracting some terms in the absolute values, but I have trouble getting rid of the y2 and the 3xy.

Any help would be awesome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
|x - 3| + |y - 2| < δ implies |x - 3| < δ and |y - 2| < δ, which mean x in (3 - δ, 3 + δ) and y in (2 - δ, 2 + δ). With these you should be able to estimate the upper bound of |3xy - 18| + |1 + x - y2|.
 
Perhaps a more intuitive way of looking at it is to let z = 3+2i + \delta z and \delta z = \epsilon e^{i \phi}, then take limit \epsilon \rightarrow 0 and check that end result does not depend on \phi.
 
Thanks, those both make sense, but I'm going to try and finish it off with the original ε,δ proof.

So here's what I get:

We have |x - 3| < δ and |y - 2| < δ, therefore x in (3 - δ, 3 + δ) and y in (2 - δ,2 + δ)
so |x| < 3 + δ and |y| < 2 + δ

hence 3|x||y| + 18 < 36 + 15δ + 3δ2
so |3xy - 18| ≤ 3|x||y| + 18 < 36 + 15δ +3δ2 (1)

Also |y|2 < 4 + 4δ + δ2
Thus 1 + |x| + |y|2 < 8 + 5δ + δ2
So |1 + x - y2| ≤ 1 + |x| + |y|2 < 8 + 5δ + δ2 (2)

If we sum (1) and (2) we get:

|3xy - 18| + |1 + x - y2| < 44 + 20δ + 4δ2 which we want to be less or equal to ε.

ie, 44 + 20δ + 4δ2 ≤ ε.

But then how do I get a specific δ? Since it's a quadratic equation it will have two different values for δ.

Tell me if you see anything wrong with my logic
 
looserlama said:
hence 3|x||y| + 18 < 36 + 15δ + 3δ2
so |3xy - 18| ≤ 3|x||y| + 18 < 36 + 15δ +3δ2 (1)

You should not expand |3xy - 18| into |x||y| + 18. If do expand, then you have a positive constant (18), which, of course, can never be less than any arbitrary ε no matter what positive δ you choose. Instead, prove that |3xy - 18| < |3(3 + δ)(2 + δ) - 18| = 15δ + 3δ2.

Ditto for the other term.
 
Ok. But if I do that won't I still get a quadratic equation relating δ and ε? So how do I get a specific δ?
 
You should get δ(a + bδ). Then you can always choose δ = min(1, ε/(a + b)).
 
looserlama said:

Homework Statement



Let z = x + iy and let f(z) = 3xy + i(x - y2). Find limz→3 + 2i f(z).

Homework Equations



The definition of a limit.

The Attempt at a Solution



I did f(3 + 2i) = 18 - i

It seems pretty clear that it is a continuous function, but I can't prove it.

Are you sure? This function doesn't satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. How are you sure there is not some path you can take such that the limit is not 18-i? (It may turn out that for this particular point the limit is path independent, but the fact this function doesn't satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations implies that there is some point for which the limit ##z \rightarrow z_0## is path-dependent)
 
Mute said:
Are you sure? This function doesn't satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. How are you sure there is not some path you can take such that the limit is not 18-i? (It may turn out that for this particular point the limit is path independent, but the fact this function doesn't satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations implies that there is some point for which the limit ##z \rightarrow z_0## is path-dependent)

You are confusing continuity with holomorphicity.
 
  • #10
voko said:
You are confusing continuity with holomorphicity.

I am pointing out the failure of the CR equations as a warning that it signals the possibility that the function might not be continuous at the point. If the function cleared the CR equations, then the OP would know right away that the function is continuous an epsilon-delta limit will work. In the present case, the OP can only try and and see if it works, so I would hesitate to say it is "clear" that the function is complex-continuous.

However, perhaps you are right that I misspoke saying the failure of CR implies there was a point for which the limits weren't path independent; I should have merely said it was possible.
 
  • #11
The CR conditions have no implications w.r.t. continuity. A function may not be holomorphic anywhere, yet be continuous everywhere. Every complex function whose real and imaginary parts are random continuous functions of two arguments is continuous. Why is it so? Because the sum of two continuous complex functions is continuous.

Holomorphicity is a much, much stronger condition than continuity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K