Find Limit of z with Polar Coordinates & L'Hopital's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter icesalmon
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the limit as (x,y) approaches (0,0) of the expression (x² + y²) * ln(x² + y²) using polar coordinates and L'Hôpital's rule. The subject area pertains to multivariable calculus and limit evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the applicability of L'Hôpital's rule in a multivariable context and the process of switching to polar coordinates. Questions arise regarding the correct use of polar coordinates and the implications of differentiating with respect to r.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the validity of using polar coordinates and L'Hôpital's rule for this limit problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation to polar coordinates and the interpretation of angles, but there is no explicit consensus on the best approach yet.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the use of L'Hôpital's rule in multivariable limits and the conditions under which polar coordinates can be applied. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the choice of angles when converting to polar coordinates.

icesalmon
Messages
270
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


use polar coordinates and L'hopital's rule to find the limit:
Lim (x,y) -> (0,0) of (x2 + y2)*ln(x2+y2)





The Attempt at a Solution


I was told in class we couldn't use l'hopital because of the multivariable thing, and I was also told the coordinate switch from rectangular to polar wasn't possible. I'm not sure if the problem is a trick question, because if I can't use L'hopital I would say the limit doesn't exist at (0,0) but how am i supposed to do this before the ideas of partial derivatives are introduced? How am I supposed to use L'Hopital's rule to help that is.
and when do I use the polar switch? before or after I take L'Hopital?
when I do switch over to polar should (x,y) become (rcos(θ),rsin(θ)) -> (0,0) or do I have to switch over from (0,0) to some other angle? am I picking an angle that simultaneously makes cos and sin zero? I don't think that one is possible, so perhaps I switch to something like (pi/2, pi) or (0,2pi) how do I choose between those? I could see sign errors arising if I make the wrong choice.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"and I was also told the coordinate switch from rectangular to polar wasn't possible."
Who told you such a thing??
It is wrong; you can.
 
my professor, he probably was referring to the problem at hand, and that it wouldn't help get the correct answer. Maybe he misunderstood what I was asking him. So if I do use polar coordinates
lim (rcos(t), rsin(t)) -> (0,0) [rln(r)] = 0ln(0) still undefined, differentiate wrt r and I get ln(r) + 1 this seems to work since the answer is 1. I need r = 1 so ln(1)= 0 hmm
 
First, notice that when you switched to ##(rcos \theta, rsin \theta)## you put yourself back in one variable, so you could use L'Hospital's Rule.

Now your confusion about the angles. The ##\theta## is whatever is correct for the vector (x,y). For example what angle does the vector (1,1) make with the x-axis? That is your ##\theta## . The vector (2,2) makes the same angle, so what about it differs from (1,1) in polar coordinates? What is ##\theta## for the vector (2,1)?

Now your function ##(x^2 + y^2)*log(x^2 + y^2)## becomes what in polar coordinates? It is the function which is going to 0, not the vector components.

See if you can make some progress now.
 
I believe you must have misunderstood what your professor was saying.

The problem is perfectly well solvable by using first coordinate transformation, and then L'Hopital's rule (for infinity/infinity).

rln(r) may be written as ln(r)/(1/r), upon which you may use L'Hopital
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K