Find moment arm of resultant force of two forces applied at two points

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the moment arm of the resultant force from two forces applied at different points, specifically using torque equations. The torque about the origin is defined as $$\vec{\tau}=(aA-bB)\hat{k}$$, and the resultant force is $$\vec{F}_R=B\hat{i}+A\hat{j}$$. The relationship between torque and the moment arm is established through the equation $$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}$$, leading to the conclusion that the masses of the particles do not affect the calculation of the moment arm in this context. The discussion clarifies that while masses are typically relevant in translational motion, they are not necessary for torque calculations in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and its mathematical representation
  • Familiarity with vector operations, particularly cross products
  • Knowledge of resultant forces and their implications in mechanics
  • Basic principles of center of mass in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in relation to forces applied at different points
  • Learn about the implications of center of mass in torque calculations
  • Explore the relationship between linear acceleration and resultant forces in mechanics
  • Investigate advanced applications of torque in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, engineers working with forces and torques, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of rotational motion.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
A force ##\vec{F}_1=A\hat{j}## is applied to ##\vec{r}_1=a\hat{i}## and a force ##\vec{F}_2## is applied to ##\vec{r}_2=b\hat{j}##.

Find the arm ##l## of the resultant force relative to the origin.
Relevant Equations
The solution below coincides with the solution manual but at this point it is pretty clear that I arrived at this answer by chance (and incorrect methods).
We have

1709789029493.png


The torque about the origin is

$$\vec{\tau}=(aA-bB)\hat{k}\tag{1}$$

The resultant force is

$$\vec{F}_R=B\hat{i}+A\hat{j}\tag{2}$$

At this point, all I did was compute

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$

which led to

$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$

which coincides with the solution manual

My question is about (3).

I wrote ##|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|## without thinking much about why I did that and now it seems pretty incorrect.

Here is my current thinking

1) We have a system of two particles of certain unknown masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.

2) The resultant force on the system works on the center of mass, which is at an unknown position ##\vec{r}## which appears in (3).

$$\vec{r}=\frac{m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{(m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2)\times (\vec{F}_1+\vec{F}_2)}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2+m_1\vec{r}_1\times\vec{F}_2+m_2\vec{r}_2\times \vec{F}_1}{m_1+m_2}$$

The two last terms in the numerator are zero in this problem.

Thus,

$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{m_1+m_2}=l|\vec{F}_R|$$

$$l=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{(m_1+m_2)\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$$

How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
At this point, all I did was compute

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$

which led to

$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$
Looks fine to me.
zenterix said:
How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
What masses?
 
haruspex said:
What masses?
How can you have a force if there is no mass?

For translational motion calculations, the resultant force acts at the center of mass.

However, in light of another problem I posted about, it seems what I said in the OP about the resultant force being applied at the center of mass is not true when we are considering torques.

Thus, we can in fact equate the torque due to the resultant force and the sum of the torques due to the forces individually.
 
zenterix said:
How can you have a force if there is no mass?
In any real situation there will be masses, of course, but here we do not know any masses and we are not concerned with accelerations, so the masses are irrelevant.
zenterix said:
For translational motion calculations, the resultant force acts at the center of mass.
Yes, for the purpose of calculating linear acceleration.
Any force with a given point of application can be treated as the sum of a force along a parallel line and a torque.
If ##\vec F## is applied at P and ##PQ=\vec r## then consider another force ##\vec F'=\vec F## applied at Q. The pair of forces ##\vec F', -\vec F## create a pure torque ##\tau=\vec r\times\vec F##. Given any reference axis R, ##\vec F## has the same torque about R as does the combination of ##\vec F'## and the torque ##-\tau##.
To find the acceleration of an object caused by ##\vec F##, we can set Q to be its mass centre. A pure torque only rotates the body about its mass centre, so the acceleration of the mass centre is given by ##\vec F=\vec F'=ma##.
zenterix said:
Thus, we can in fact equate the torque due to the resultant force and the sum of the torques due to the forces individually.
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K