Find moment arm of resultant force of two forces applied at two points

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the moment arm of the resultant force from two forces applied at different points. The torque about the origin is expressed as a function of the forces and their positions, leading to a resultant force that is analyzed in terms of its application at the center of mass. A key point of confusion arises regarding the absence of mass in the solution manual's approach, as participants clarify that while masses are relevant in real scenarios, they are not necessary for the torque calculations in this context. The conversation emphasizes that the torque due to the resultant force can indeed be equated to the sum of the individual torques from the applied forces. Ultimately, the analysis confirms that the absence of mass does not invalidate the torque calculations in this specific problem.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
A force ##\vec{F}_1=A\hat{j}## is applied to ##\vec{r}_1=a\hat{i}## and a force ##\vec{F}_2## is applied to ##\vec{r}_2=b\hat{j}##.

Find the arm ##l## of the resultant force relative to the origin.
Relevant Equations
The solution below coincides with the solution manual but at this point it is pretty clear that I arrived at this answer by chance (and incorrect methods).
We have

1709789029493.png


The torque about the origin is

$$\vec{\tau}=(aA-bB)\hat{k}\tag{1}$$

The resultant force is

$$\vec{F}_R=B\hat{i}+A\hat{j}\tag{2}$$

At this point, all I did was compute

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$

which led to

$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$

which coincides with the solution manual

My question is about (3).

I wrote ##|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|## without thinking much about why I did that and now it seems pretty incorrect.

Here is my current thinking

1) We have a system of two particles of certain unknown masses ##m_1## and ##m_2##.

2) The resultant force on the system works on the center of mass, which is at an unknown position ##\vec{r}## which appears in (3).

$$\vec{r}=\frac{m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{(m_1\vec{r}_1+m_2\vec{r}_2)\times (\vec{F}_1+\vec{F}_2)}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2+m_1\vec{r}_1\times\vec{F}_2+m_2\vec{r}_2\times \vec{F}_1}{m_1+m_2}$$

The two last terms in the numerator are zero in this problem.

Thus,

$$\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R=\frac{m_1\vec{\tau}_1+m_2\vec{\tau}_2}{m_1+m_2}$$

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{m_1+m_2}=l|\vec{F}_R|$$

$$l=\frac{m_1aA-m_2bB}{(m_1+m_2)\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}$$

How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
At this point, all I did was compute

$$|\vec{r}\times\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{r}||\vec{F}_R|\sin{\theta}=l|\vec{F}_R|=|\vec{\tau}|\tag{3}$$

which led to

$$l=\frac{|\vec{\tau}|}{|\vec{F}_R|}=\frac{\sqrt{(aA-bB)^2}}{\sqrt{A^2+B^2}}\tag{4}$$
Looks fine to me.
zenterix said:
How did the solution manual arrive at the rhs of (4) as the solution? Ie, why are there no masses in their solution?
What masses?
 
haruspex said:
What masses?
How can you have a force if there is no mass?

For translational motion calculations, the resultant force acts at the center of mass.

However, in light of another problem I posted about, it seems what I said in the OP about the resultant force being applied at the center of mass is not true when we are considering torques.

Thus, we can in fact equate the torque due to the resultant force and the sum of the torques due to the forces individually.
 
zenterix said:
How can you have a force if there is no mass?
In any real situation there will be masses, of course, but here we do not know any masses and we are not concerned with accelerations, so the masses are irrelevant.
zenterix said:
For translational motion calculations, the resultant force acts at the center of mass.
Yes, for the purpose of calculating linear acceleration.
Any force with a given point of application can be treated as the sum of a force along a parallel line and a torque.
If ##\vec F## is applied at P and ##PQ=\vec r## then consider another force ##\vec F'=\vec F## applied at Q. The pair of forces ##\vec F', -\vec F## create a pure torque ##\tau=\vec r\times\vec F##. Given any reference axis R, ##\vec F## has the same torque about R as does the combination of ##\vec F'## and the torque ##-\tau##.
To find the acceleration of an object caused by ##\vec F##, we can set Q to be its mass centre. A pure torque only rotates the body about its mass centre, so the acceleration of the mass centre is given by ##\vec F=\vec F'=ma##.
zenterix said:
Thus, we can in fact equate the torque due to the resultant force and the sum of the torques due to the forces individually.
Yes.
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top