Find Number of First Missing Maximum in Double Slit Diffraction Pattern

  • Thread starter Thread starter ttk3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Double slit Slit
Click For Summary
To find the number of the first missing maximum in a double slit diffraction pattern, the relationship between the slit width, spacing, and wavelength is crucial. The given parameters are a slit width of 0.01 mm and a spacing of 0.04 mm. The double slit maxima overlap with single slit minima, necessitating the use of both the double-slit and single-slit equations. The wavelength is needed to calculate the positions of the maxima and minima, and it may cancel out in the final equations. Understanding these relationships is essential for solving the problem accurately.
ttk3
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A double slit is composed of two single slits. Each slit has a width of w = 0.01 mm and they are spaced s = 0.04 mm apart. Because the double slit is actually two single slits, the single slit diffraction pattern is superimposed over the double slit pattern and so some of the double slit maxima are missing because they overlap with single slit minima. Find the number (m) of the first missing maximum in the double slit pattern.

Homework Equations



wavelength = (ym/m)(s/l)

The Attempt at a Solution



s = 0.04 mm
w=0.01 mm

I am completely lost on this one. I know I need the wavelength to find this answer along with the maxima value (ym) and a value for L. could you please help me get started?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the double-slit equation. You'll also need the single-slit equation in order to find the first single-slit minimum.

It's possible the wavelength term will cancel out in the equations.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K