Find the area enclosed by x + y^2 = 12 and x + y = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter apiwowar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the area enclosed by the curves defined by the equations x + y^2 = 12 and x + y = 0. Participants are exploring integration techniques to calculate this area.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods of setting up the integral, including integrating with respect to y versus x. There are attempts to clarify the order of equations in the integral setup and the implications of switching them. Some participants question the boundaries of integration and the signs used in the calculations.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided guidance on how to approach the integration, suggesting different boundaries and methods. There is ongoing exploration of the correct limits of integration and the relationships between the functions involved. Some participants have noted discrepancies in the calculated area values, prompting further investigation into the setup.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential sign errors and the importance of correctly identifying the intersection points of the curves to determine appropriate limits for integration. Participants are also considering the implications of integrating with respect to different variables.

apiwowar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
i sketched the graph
found that i should integrate from -3 to 4

then set up the integral as the integral from -3 to 4 of (-y) - (12-y^2)

after evaluating it i got -34.66666667 - 22.5
which is -57. 1666667

but the right area is 57.16666667

what did i do wrong what got me the wrong answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try making two calculations. One for the boundaries y=-3 to y=0 and another for the boundaries y=0 to y=4. Then add the areas.

If you are still getting a negative value, take a look at your signs when you integrate.

A final thing to try might be integrating with the equations in the y(x) form instead of the x(y) form like you are doing
 
Sorry, I just gave you a couple of different ways to do the integration that might help you see what you did wrong.

Looking at your setup, you have everything right except for the order of the equations in your integration. Switch the equations and your sign will change.

The reason for this is you are integrating from left to right on the x-axis (negative to positive). If you were doing this same problem with respect to x, would you write sqrt(12-x)-(-x) or -x-sqrt(12-x)? Your answer to this should help you understand why you need to switch the order of your equations.
 
i switched the equations and got the right answer but to find the area this way doesn't f(x) have to be greater than or equal to g(x) so therefore y = -x is greater than x = 12- y^2 when you graph them
 
apiwowar said:
i switched the equations and got the right answer but to find the area this way doesn't f(x) have to be greater than or equal to g(x) so therefore y = -x is greater than x = 12- y^2 when you graph them

Looking at it in terms of f(x) and g(x), let [tex]f\left(x\right)=-x[/tex] and [tex]g\left(x\right)=\pm\sqrt{12-x}[/tex].

From the point where they intersect in quadrant II, (-4, 4) all the way to (12, 0), g(x) > f(x). It is important to realize that g(x) is not a function. For any value in the domain x with the exception of x=12, there are two corresponding values in the codomain. This is why we have the +- in front of the square root. This let's us divide g(x) into two functions, one for the + and one for the -. Grab a graphing calculator and plot y=-x, y=sqrt(12-x) and y=-sqrt(12-x). Then look at the relations at the different boundaries (y=-3, y=0, or y=4). At each of these boundaries and everywhere in between, there is a value in the relation g(x)=-sqrt(12-x) where g(x)>f(x) with the exception of the intersection point at (-4, 4)

So, you integrate with the greater function minus the lesser function to find the are in between.
 
Your area elements are horizontal strips that extend, left to right, from the line (x = -y) to the parabola (x = -y^2 + 12), and from y = -4 to y = 3. The x-values on the parabola are greater than those on the line, so the integral below will give you the area as a positive number.

Also, it is much simpler in this problem to integrate with respect to y (using horizontal strips) than to integrate with respect to x (using vertical strips).
[tex]\int_{y = -4}^3 (-y^2 + 12) -(-y)~dy[/tex]

Are you sure that the correct answer is 57.16666? I get 50.16666.
 
Mark44 said:
Your area elements are horizontal strips that extend, left to right, from the line (x = -y) to the parabola (x = -y^2 + 12), and from y = -4 to y = 3. The x-values on the parabola are greater than those on the line, so the integral below will give you the area as a positive number.

Also, it is much simpler in this problem to integrate with respect to y (using horizontal strips) than to integrate with respect to x (using vertical strips).
[tex]\int_{y = -4}^3 (-y^2 + 12) -(-y)~dy[/tex]

Are you sure that the correct answer is 57.16666? I get 50.16666.

[tex]\int_{y = -3}^4 (-y^2 + 12) -(-y)~dy[/tex]

[tex]\left[12y-\frac{1}{3}y^{3}+\frac{1}{2}y^{2} \right]^{4}_{-3}[/tex]

Evaluating the above gives

[tex]\left(48-21.3333+8\right)-\left(-36+9+4.5)=57.1667[/tex]

Your boundaries are wrong. Look at the graph and find where x+y2=12 and x+y=0 intersect. There will be two points. Take the y values from these intersection points as your limits of integration.

If you are going to think about integration in terms of the rectangular strips with width dy, you don't want left to right, which is for integrating with respect to dx (tiny intervals measured on the x-axis). You have to think about top to bottom because we are integrating with respect to the dy (tiny intervals measured on the y-axis).
 
singular said:
[tex]\int_{y = -3}^4 (-y^2 + 12) -(-y)~dy[/tex]

[tex]\left[12y-\frac{1}{3}y^{3}+\frac{1}{2}y^{2} \right]^{4}_{-3}[/tex]

Evaluating the above gives

[tex]\left(48-21.3333+8\right)-\left(-36+9+4.5)=57.1667[/tex]

Your boundaries are wrong.
Yes. I made a sign error in the middle term of my quadratic and got y = -4 and y = 3, instead of y = 4 and y = -3.
singular said:
Look at the graph and find where x+y2=12 and x+y=0 intersect. There will be two points. Take the y values from these intersection points as your limits of integration.

If you are going to think about integration in terms of the rectangular strips with width dy, you don't want left to right, which is for integrating with respect to dx (tiny intervals measured on the x-axis). You have to think about top to bottom because we are integrating with respect to the dy (tiny intervals measured on the y-axis).

I think we're both saying the same thing here in different words. The long dimension in each of my horizontal strips runs from the x-value on the line to the x-value on the parabola, and the short dimension is dy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K