Find the current using jω method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skarki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Method
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding the current in a circuit using the jω method, specifically involving a resistor, inductor, and capacitor. Participants explore the application of phasors and complex impedance in the context of AC circuit analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the circuit parameters and initial approach to find the total impedance and current expression.
  • Another participant questions the initial claim of components being in series, clarifying that they are indeed in series.
  • A later reply requests to see the participant's work and results so far, suggesting a need for clarity in the calculations.
  • Several participants provide the formulas for the impedances of the resistor, inductor, and capacitor, and derive the total impedance.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about the time-varying nature of voltages across the components, suggesting it complicates the problem.
  • Another participant suggests that the current should be calculated as a phasor at the given frequency, emphasizing the importance of complex impedance.
  • A participant references a Wikipedia definition of phasors, highlighting the distinction between time-domain functions and phasor representation.
  • One participant shares their calculated results for the total impedance and current, including both rectangular and polar forms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of phasors and complex impedance for solving the problem, but there are differing views on the implications of time-varying voltages and the correct approach to the calculations. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best method to represent the current.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the circuit behavior, particularly concerning the time-dependence of voltages and currents. Some mathematical steps remain unresolved, and the implications of using phasors versus time-domain functions are debated.

Skarki
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Summary: Current using jω method with 3 components in the following series : Resistor, capacitor and Inductor.

I have the following information:

R=1 * 10^3 ohm
L = 0.5 H
C = 0.1 * 10^-6 F

v(t) = 230 * sqrt(2) * sin(2pi * 400 * t)

All the components are in parallel as shown in the image:

And the task is to find the expression for I(t).

What I've done so far:
I've put up expressions for Ztot = Zr + Zc + Zl

With this I tried the formula I(t) = V(t) / Ztot.

I multiplied both the numerator and denumerator with the conjugate of the denumerator. And I get an equation of the form I(t) = A+iB

And now I am stuck, any tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF. :smile:

Skarki said:
with 3 components in the following series
Skarki said:
All the components are in parallel as shown in the image:
All are in series, right?
 
berkeman said:
Welcome to PF. :smile:
All are in series, right?
Yeah, I wrote wrong. All components are ofcourse in series!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Skarki said:
I multiplied both the numerator and denumerator with the conjugate of the denumerator. And I get an equation of the form I(t) = A+iB
Can you show us this work and your result so far?

Also, going forward it's best to learn to post in LaTeX (see the "LaTeX Guide" link below the Edit window).
 
$$R=10^{3} [\Omega]$$
$$L=0.5 [H]$$
$$C=0.1 \cdot 10^{-6} [F]$$
$$U(t) = 230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t) [V]$$

$$Z_{R} = R [\Omega]$$
$$Z_{L} = j{\omega}L [\Omega]$$
$$Z_{C} = \frac{-j}{\omega C} [\Omega]$$

$$Z_{tot}=Z_{R} + Z_{C} + Z_{L} = R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})$$

$$I(t)=\frac{U(t)}{Z_{tot}} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t)}{R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t)}{R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} \cdot \frac{R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})}{R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t) \cdot (R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})}{R^{2}+(\omega L - 1 \frac{1}{\omega C})^{2}} = \frac{230R\sqrt{2}\sin(2\pi400t)}{R^{2}+{(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C}})^2} - j\frac{(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C} )\cdot 230\sqrt{2}\sin(2\pi400t)}{R^{2}+(\omega L - 1 \frac{1}{\omega C})^{2}}$$
 
Skarki said:
$$R=10^{3} [\Omega]$$
$$L=0.5 [H]$$
$$C=0.1 \cdot 10^{-6} [F]$$
$$U(t) = 230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t) [V]$$

$$Z_{R} = R [\Omega]$$
$$Z_{L} = j{\omega}L [\Omega]$$
$$Z_{C} = \frac{-j}{\omega C} [\Omega]$$

$$Z_{tot}=Z_{R} + Z_{C} + Z_{L} = R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})$$

$$I(t)=\frac{U(t)}{Z_{tot}} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t)}{R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t)}{R + j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} \cdot \frac{R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})}{R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})} = \frac{230 \cdot \sqrt{2} \sin(2\pi \cdot 400t) \cdot (R - j(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C})}{R^{2}+(\omega L - 1 \frac{1}{\omega C})^{2}} = \frac{230R\sqrt{2}\sin(2\pi400t)}{R^{2}+{(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C}})^2} - j\frac{(\omega L - \frac{1}{\omega C} )\cdot 230\sqrt{2}\sin(2\pi400t)}{R^{2}+(\omega L - 1 \frac{1}{\omega C})^{2}}$$

Aren't the inductor and capacitor voltages a function of time?

The Voltage Source is changing in time, and presumably so is the current. I believe the voltages across the components are all varying in time because the current is varying in time. Perhaps I'm mistaken though as that seems to be a difficult problem to solve.
 
Last edited:
As far as the algebra goes, all seems well. If this is the current (I'm not sure of what I said above is anything to worry about), then what is the issue you are concerned about? I think the next step is to find the phase angle if the objective is to get rid of the ##j##.
 
Last edited:
@Skarki -- Are you learning about how to use Phasors to solve circuit behavior at a particular frequency? If you needed to calculate the transfer function versus frequency of that circuit for the voltages between specific nodes, you would need to do a full equation with ##j\omega## carried along. But in this case, the excitation voltage is at one particular frequency, so the current flowing will also be at that same frequency, and this simplifies to a Phasor problem.

So all you need to do is calculate the complex impedance of each element at that excitation frequency and add them and then use the complex version of V=IR at that frequency to calculate the resulting current.

Does that make sense? And big props for picking up LaTeX so quickly! :smile:

And extra bonus points for carrying units along in your equations. That is a great habit to get into in your studies now and your work in the future. :smile:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phasor
 
In Wikipedia is written:

In physics and engineering, a phasor is a complex number representing a sinusoidal function whose amplitude (A), angular frequency (ω), and initial phase (θ) are time-invariant.

So, in order to work with phasors you have to use only complex numbers which are not in time domain. Then to transform √2*V*sin(2*π*400*t) into a phasor.

You may use functions in time domain but in this case you have to remain in time domain. For instance:

i(t)*R+di(t)/dt*L+∫i(t)*dt=√2*V*sin(2*π*400*t)
 
  • #10
Here’s the answer I got:

##R=1000< 0^o ~\Omega##
##X_L=j\omega L = j1256.637 ~\Omega##
##X_C=-j\frac 1 {\omega C} = -j3978.874 ~\Omega##

##Z_{TOT} = R + X_L + X_C##
##Z_{TOT} = 1000~-~j2722.237 ~\Omega ~\rm or##
##Z_{TOT} = 2900< -69.83^o ~\Omega##

##I_{(t)} = \frac {V}{Z_{TOT}} = \frac{230 < 0^o~V}{2900 < -69.83^o~\Omega}##

##I_{(t)} = 79.3\rm x 10^{-3} < 69.83^o~A_{rms}##

And, converting rms to peak:

##I_{(t)} = (\sqrt 2)79.3 \rm x 10^{-3}~sin(2\pi 400t + 69.83^o)~A##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Babadag

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K