Find the determinant using row operations

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the determinant of a 3x3 matrix using row operations. A participant initially calculated the determinant as -15 but was confused about why it wasn't -30 after multiplying a row by 2. It was clarified that adding a multiple of one row to another does not change the determinant's value, while replacing a row with a multiple of itself does. The correct answer remains -15, and the key takeaway is understanding the different effects of various row operations on the determinant. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between these operations in determinant calculations.
vs55
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the determinant using row operations:
1 -2 2
0 5 -1
2 -4 1



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i took row 3 and took 2 x row 1 away from it to get :
1 -2 2
0 5 -1
0 0 -3
1 x 5 x (-3) = -15...but i multiplied a row by 2 so i should get -30 for the det right?but the answer in my book is -15..what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Calculating the determinant for A, a 3x3 matrix with elements:
a b c
d e f
g h i

Det(A) = a(ei - fh) - b(di - fg) + c(dh-eg), by starting with row 1.

So -15 is the answer you should be getting.
 


Adding a row or a multiple of a row to another row doesn't change the value of the determinant. If you had replaced a row by a multiple of itself, then the determinant's value would have changed.
 


hmmm well i looked over my book, and it said if i multiply a row by k...i multiply the determinant by k...so when do we multiply the determinant by k?..cause what i did was that not multiplying a row by k(2)?

and thanks for ur help guys
 


vs55 said:
hmmm well i looked over my book, and it said if i multiply a row by k...i multiply the determinant by k...so when do we multiply the determinant by k?..cause what i did was that not multiplying a row by k(2)?

and thanks for ur help guys
You did not replace a row by some multiple of itself; you added a multiple of a row to another row. These are different operations. On the other hand, if you had replaced row 1 by -2 times itself, and then added the first row to the third row, then your determinant would have been +30. This is not what you did though, since the first row stayed the same from start to finish.

In one of the linear algebra books I have, there is a theorem about determinants and row operations. The theorem has three parts.
  1. If you interchange two rows, the determinant of the new matrix will be -1 times the determinant of the old matrix.
  2. If you replace a row by k times itself, the determinant of the new matrix will be k times the determinant of the old matrix.
  3. If you add k times one row to another row, the determinant of the new matrix will be equal to the determinant of the old matrix.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K