Find the Electric Field E using Gauss' Law

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the electric field E using Gauss' Law for two point charges: +q and +4q. The user initially applied the formula ##E.A=\frac {q}{ε_°}##, substituting the area of a sphere to derive the electric fields as ##E_q= \frac {kq}{r^2}## and ##E_{4q}= \frac {4kq}{r^2}##. The user expressed confusion regarding the direction of the electric fields, particularly whether they should be negative. The final electric field was calculated as ##E= \frac {3kq}{r^2}## for the first scenario and ##E=-\frac {37kq}{9r^2}## for the second, highlighting the importance of vector direction in electric field calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law and its application in electrostatics.
  • Familiarity with electric field concepts and vector notation.
  • Knowledge of charge interactions and superposition principle.
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for manipulating equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the vector form of Gauss' Law for clearer understanding of electric field directions.
  • Learn about the superposition theorem in electrostatics for multiple charge systems.
  • Explore electric field calculations for different geometries, such as spherical and cylindrical symmetries.
  • Review resources on electric flux and its relationship to electric fields, such as those found on HyperPhysics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, as well as anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of electric fields and Gauss' Law applications.

Nicci
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Two charges +q and +4q are separated a distance of 2r. Use Gauss' Law to find the electric field E at a distance:
a) r around the charge +q
b) 3r around charge +q
Relevant Equations
##A = 4πr^2##
##E.A=\frac {q}{ε_°}##
I tried to work out both a) and b), but I am not sure if I am correct. I drew a picture with a sphere around q first with radius r and then with radius 3r.

For a) ##E.A=\frac {q}{ε_°}## (when using Gauss' Law)
Since ##A=4πr^2##, I substituted this in the equation and solved for E giving me ##E_q= \frac {kq}{r^2}##
My problem is that I am not sure if this is correct and the direction of the field is confusing me. I thought it should be negative...##E_q= -\frac {kq}{r^2}##

I then solved for the electric field using the +4q charge. This I did in the same way as the +q charge. ##E_{4q} = \frac {4q}{4πr^2ε_°}## which gives ##E_{4q}= \frac {4kq}{r^2}## I thought this would be positive.

To get the electric field E: ##E=E_{4q} - E_q## which gives ##E= \frac {3kq}{r^2}##
I am not really sure if I have done this correctly. The directions of the fields are really confusing me.

For b) I basically did the same as for a). The only difference was the distance which increased from r to 3r.

I started by saying ##E_q = \frac {q}{4π(9r^2)ε_°}## and simplifying this gives me ##E_q = \frac {kq}{9r^2}##. I thought the direction would be to the left, making it negative: ##E_q = -\frac {kq}{9r^2}##
For the other charge ##E_{4q} = \frac {4q}{4πr^2ε_°}## which gives ##E_{4q} = \frac {4kq}{r^2}##. I reckon the direction would be to the left, also making it negative: ##E_{4q} =- \frac {4kq}{r^2}##

Getting E:
##E=E_q+E_{4q}## which gives ##E= -\frac {kq}{9r^2} -\frac {4kq}{r^2}##

Upon simplification I get:
##E=-\frac {37kq}{9r^2}##

I am confused about the directions of the electric fields. Can someone maybe help me by explaining how to get the directions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicci said:
I am confused about the directions of the electric fields. Can someone maybe help me by explaining how to get the directions?
To get directions, you need to use the vector form of Gauss' Law. Are you familiar with how to use the (2-D) vector form?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/elesph.html#c1
1565108382784.png
 
The electric field depends on the position of the point where you want to know the field not just the distance from one of the charges. Without that information you cannot answer this question. This is a bad problem as stated. Are you sure you are looking for the electric field and not the electric flux through spheres centered at charge +q?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: archaic
The electric field is a consequence of the presence of both charges, therefore you should take ##4q+## into account as well. Superposition theorem.

Untitled.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K