Find the electric field produced by two rods

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electric field produced by two thin rods with opposite charges positioned along the x-axis, specifically at a point on the y-axis. The original poster expresses a desire to solve the problem without using calculus, which they find confusing.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the cancellation of vertical components of the electric field and the need to consider the rods as line charges rather than point charges. There is an ongoing exploration of how to set up the integration needed to find the total electric field.

Discussion Status

Participants have provided guidance on breaking down the problem into smaller elements for integration and have discussed the implications of the results obtained. There is a recognition of the complexity of the integration process, and some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their results.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted preference for avoiding calculus, which may limit the approaches discussed. Additionally, concerns are raised about the potential for negative results in the final expression for the electric field, prompting further inquiry into the assumptions made regarding the values of h and L.

kasparov5
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two thin rods of length L lie on the x axis. One of them has a charge of
-Q uniformly distributed along its length and is positioned between x = -L
and x = 0. The other one has a charge of +Q uniformly distributed along
its length and is positioned between x = 0 and x = L. Find the electric field
produced by the two rods (magnitude and direction) at a point O located on
the y-axis at y = h.


Homework Equations



I would imagine the relevant equation is E=kq/r^2.

I would kind of like to solve this without calculus, since i don't understand that.

The Attempt at a Solution



I think the vertical components cancel out. After that, I really have no idea what to do. Maybe you plug in the distance into the above formula. I am really confused with this problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kasparov5 said:
I think the vertical components cancel out.
Good.
After that, I really have no idea what to do. Maybe you plug in the distance into the above formula.
The formula you quoted is for a point charge.

I see no way to avoid using a bit of calculus here.
 
I won't address your question, but I do recommend you buy a simple book on calculus for nighttime reading and enjoyment. When I was young, I had a series of books on mathematics, one of which was "calculus for the practical man". I own several calculus textbooks now, but this little book taught me calculus in 7th grade and I understood what I was doing, not just memorizing. Calculus is easy if you understand why you are using it. Learn differentials, integrals and differential equations, which isn't in that little book, but very useful in life.

Good luck with your question ...

Ken
 
I think I did it without calculus. After realizing that the vertical components cancel out. I then realized that the net electric field produced by both rods will be simply 2 times the horizontal component of the electric field produced by one of the two charges. After some plugging and chugging and trigonometry, I got the following answer:

E_net on point O = (2KQL)/(((L^2)+(h^2))^3/2)

Is this correct? Is my logic sound? If not, what could I be missing.

Please help. This problem has been really annoying.
 
kasparov5 said:
I think I did it without calculus. After realizing that the vertical components cancel out. I then realized that the net electric field produced by both rods will be simply 2 times the horizontal component of the electric field produced by one of the two charges.
Good. But realize that each charge is a line of charge, not a point charge. (You'll have to integrate.)
After some plugging and chugging and trigonometry, I got the following answer:

E_net on point O = (2KQL)/(((L^2)+(h^2))^3/2)
How did you arrive at this answer?
 
I arrived at that answer by converting cos theta to variables L and h and I multiplied that by twice the electric field caused by the charge at the very end of the bar. Clearly, I forgot the fact that it is indeed a LINE of charge.

Can you show me how to begin the integration for this problem? I really have no idea.
 
kasparov5 said:
Can you show me how to begin the integration for this problem? I really have no idea.
Break up the line of charge into small elements of length dx. The charge density would be λ = Q/L. Then express the horizontal component of the field due to an element of charge at position x. Set that up, then integrate to get the total field from the entire line of charge. Give it a shot.
 
I did that. I removed the constants 2k(lambda) (2 coming from multiplying by 2 since there are two bars) and i have an integral from the length L to 0 of (x)/(x^2 +h^2)^3/2 dx...but i do not know how to integrate this. There is an h inside there that technically is also a constant, but I cannot get it out of the integral like 2k(lambda). How do I integrate this last section?

Thanks!
 
Just play around with it a bit. Try a substitution, such as y^2 = x^2 + h^2.
 
  • #10
I think I got the answer as being E_net = 2k(Q/L)*[(1/h)-(1/sqrt(L^2+h^2))] where Q/L is of course lambda. I got this by substituting like you said and then plugging in L and 0 for x to find the definite integral. The electric field is in the negative x direction.

Please tell me if this is the correct answer. I worked quite hard on it. Is there anything I did wrong?

Thanks for your encouragement!
 
  • #11
Looks good to me. Nice job!
 
  • #12
oh no...i think it is wrong because what if (1/h)-(1/sqrt(L^2+h^2)) turns out negative?

I might get a positive or negative answer.

What does this mean? Is it wrong?
 
  • #13
kasparov5 said:
oh no...i think it is wrong because what if (1/h)-(1/sqrt(L^2+h^2)) turns out negative?
Do you think that's possible? Compare h to sqrt(L^2+h^2).
 
  • #14
:wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
4K