Find the exact logarithmic form of y at A where y= -x + tanh4x is

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Logarithmic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the exact logarithmic form of the function y = -x + tanh(4x) at a specific point A, where the x-coordinate is given as ln(2 + √3). The context involves understanding the behavior of the function at a maximum turning point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the maximum turning point condition (dy/dx = 0) and its relevance to the problem. There are attempts to substitute the x-coordinate into the function and simplify the expression, with varying degrees of success. Some participants question the correctness of their algebraic manipulations and the resulting expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning each other's calculations. There is no explicit consensus, but various methods and interpretations are being explored, particularly regarding the use of logarithmic properties and the behavior of the tanh function.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential errors in their calculations and the need for careful handling of logarithmic and exponential functions. There is an acknowledgment of the complexities involved in the algebraic manipulations, particularly when dealing with limits and undefined expressions.

thomas49th
Messages
645
Reaction score
0
[tex]\frac{2\sqrt{3} - ln(2+\sqrt{3})}{4}[/tex]

Given that the x co-ordinate is [tex]ln(2+ \sqrt{3})[/tex] which I worked out in the first part of this qusetion given that at A there is a maximum turning point (so maximum turning point means dy/dx = 0), but I'm not sure that helps in this part of the question

y= -x + tanh4xi tried [tex]y = -ln(2+ \sqrt{3}) + tanh4.ln(2+ \sqrt{3})[/tex] but can't really see how that simplifies :\

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]tanh(4x)= \frac{e^{4x}- e^{-4x}}{e^{4x}+ e^{-4x}}[/tex]
so
[tex]tanh(4(2+ \sqrt{3}))= \frac{e^{8+ 4\sqrt{3}}- e^{-8-4\sqrt{3}}}{e^{-2-\sqrt{3}}+e^{-2-\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]
Is that better?
 
sorry hall of ivy I missed out a ln in my original latex post. However, I will try that method, but putting a ln in front of it (to cancel out e's). Hopefully that will get me somewhere

Thanks :)
 
nope that gives me (2(2+sqrt(3))^4)/ 0 which cannot be :\
 
also did you make a mistake on the second line of your second fraction... shouldn't it be
[tex] tanh(4(2+ \sqrt{3}))= \frac{e^{8+ 4\sqrt{3}}- e^{-8-4\sqrt{3}}}{e^{8+ 4\sqrt{3}}+ e^{-8-4\sqrt{3}}}[/tex]
:P
 
What is [itex]e^{\ln a}, e^{-\ln a}[/itex]?
 
e and ln are inverses of each other, just like squaring and square-rooting.

Therefore,

[tex]e^{lna}=a[/tex]

and

[tex]e^{-lna}=(e^{lna})^{-1}=a^{-1}=\frac{1}{a}[/tex]

Note that if a is positive, [tex]e^{ln(-a)}\neq -a[/tex] simply because the log of a negative doesn't exist.
 
Yes.

sorry hall of ivy I missed out a ln in my original latex post. However, I will try that method, but putting a ln in front of it (to cancel out e's). Hopefully that will get me somewhere

thanks :)

nope that gives me (2(2+sqrt(3))^4)/ 0 which cannot be :\

Then I don't understand how you got a 0 in the denominator, because [itex]\exp(\ln[(2+\sqrt{3})^4])=(2+\sqrt{3})^4, \; \exp(-\ln[(2+\sqrt{3})]^4)=1/(2+\sqrt{3})^4[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K