Find the formula of a hydrocarbon using combustion data

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the molecular formula of a hydrocarbon using combustion data, specifically the moles of CO2 and water produced. Participants calculated the ratio of carbon to hydrogen as 2:3 based on combustion results and explored the implications of relative density in relation to helium. They concluded that the molar mass of the hydrocarbon can be derived from its relative density, leading to the final formula C4H6. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using Avogadro's principle and the mole concept in these calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the mole concept in chemistry
  • Familiarity with combustion reactions and stoichiometry
  • Knowledge of Avogadro's law regarding gas volumes
  • Basic principles of density and relative density calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mole concept and its applications in chemical reactions
  • Learn about combustion analysis for determining molecular formulas
  • Explore Avogadro's law and its implications for gas behavior
  • Investigate the relationship between density and molar mass in gases
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and professionals interested in analytical chemistry and hydrocarbon analysis will benefit from this discussion.

lioric
Messages
335
Reaction score
26
Homework Statement
Find the formula of a hydrocarbon. Combustion of that hydrocarbon resulted
in the formation of 2 L of carbon dioxide and 1.205 g of water. The relative density
of the hydrocarbon per helium is 13.5.
Relevant Equations
number of moles of any gas =22.4L
number of moles = mass/ molar mass
density = mass / volume
number of moles of CO2 =0.089moles (using 2/22.4)
number of moles of water = 0.067 (using 1.205/18)
I know that all the carbon from the hydrocarbon is in the CO2
and all the hydrogen from the hydrocarbon is in the water and water creates x2 hydrogens

so number of moles of C : H = 0.089 : 0.067x2
0.089 : 0.134
so I get 1 : 1.50
which is like 2 : 3

now what do I do with the relative density?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use it to calculate molar mass.
 
Borek said:
Use it to calculate molar mass.
I know that but what do I use as volume?
 
Doesn't matter, it will cancel out. It is ratio that matters. Do the calculations using symbols first.

You can start with 1 L if it will make it easier to grasp the concept, just don't crunch the numbers before you derive the final formula, it will actually save you time and remove potential source of errors, as most of calculations are not necessary.
 
Borek said:
Doesn't matter, it will cancel out. It is ratio that matters. Do the calculations using symbols first.

You can start with 1 L if it will make it easier to grasp the concept, just don't crunch the numbers before you derive the final formula, it will actually save you time and remove potential source of errors, as most of calculations are not necessary.

Ok. So density of the hydrocarbon is 13.5g/L
So 13.5g/L= mass/L
So that means the mass of the hydrocarbon is 13.5g/L
moles = mass/ molar mass
But what do I use for moles
 
I'd have thought relative density wrt (=per?) He, means the hydrocarbon gas is 13.5 times more dense than He gas at the same temp & press.
He isn't 1g/litre, more like 0.178 g/l, which gives 2.40 g/l, but I think you don't really need to know that.

But I might think of Avogadro.
 
Merlin3189 said:
I'd have thought relative density wrt (=per?) He, means the hydrocarbon gas is 13.5 times more dense than He gas at the same temp & press.
He isn't 1g/litre, more like 0.178 g/l, which gives 2.40 g/l, but I think you don't really need to know that.

But I might think of Avogadro.
I think since the question says that it's relative density per helium we need to take that into account.
Thank you

But I'm still stuck with the moles that I'm going to use
 
Sorry about the "relative density per He". I thought I'd understood that to mean "RD with respect to He", but it's a new term to me. If I've got it wrong, can you explain what it means please?

We can take RD into account without working out absolute density in g/l. That's why I said you don't need to find 2.40 g/l.

How about using 1 mole of HC and 1 mole of He?
What does Avogadro say about their volumes?

So what does the RD tell us about the masses of 1 mole of each?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree
Merlin3189 said:
Sorry about the "relative density per He". I thought I'd understood that to mean "RD with respect to He", but it's a new term to me. If I've got it wrong, can you explain what it means please?

We can take RD into account without working out absolute density in g/l. That's why I said you don't need to find 2.40 g/l.

How about using 1 mole of HC and 1 mole of He?
What does Avogadro say about their volumes?

So what does the RD tell us about the masses of 1 mole of each?
Their volumes are sames at the same conditions
 
  • #10
So 1 mole of CxHy has the same volume as 1 mole of He.
RD tells us 1 volume of CxHy has 13.5 times the mass of 1 volume of He
So 1 mole of CxHy has 13.5 times the mass of 1 mole of He.

If you know the molar mass of He, then you can work out the molar mass of CxHy.

My reference to Avogadro was to his idea that equal volumes of gas contain the same number of molecules. Since all the mass of a gas is in the molecules, not the space between, then if one is N times as dense as the other, then its molecules must be N times more massive. So you can go straight from RD to relative molecular mass, without bothering with volumes, moles
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chemisttree
  • #11
Merlin3189 said:
So 1 mole of CxHy has the same volume as 1 mole of He.
RD tells us 1 volume of CxHy has 13.5 times the mass of 1 volume of He
So 1 mole of CxHy has 13.5 times the mass of 1 mole of He.

If you know the molar mass of He, then you can work out the molar mass of CxHy.
I see
1 mole of He has a mass of 4.002g
1 mole of CxHy has 4.002g x 13.5= 54.027g
If the empirical formula is C2H3 =27g
CxHy = 54.027
54.027/27= 2.001
2x C2H3
C4H6

Am I ok?
 
  • #12
That's my logic.
I await a chemist to tell us what on Earth this stuff is!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lioric
  • #13
Merlin3189 said:
That's my logic.
I await a chemist to tell us what on Earth this stuff is!
Same here. That logic makes a lot of sense
 
  • #14
lioric said:
Same here. That logic makes a lot of sense
It should because it’s correct, whether you’re a chemist or not. I am a chemist and I’ve never seen the term “relative density” used like this before. It is a clever way to test across several concepts. And using Avogadro’s analysis is precisely how to use the relative density information.

Concepts tested:
1) Mole concept
2) convert from volume to moles
3) convert from mass to moles
4) avogadro relationship of moles to volume
5) algebraic concept of relative ratios
6) distinguishing between empirical and molecular formula
7) concept of density
8) knowledge of combustion reaction

It’s a good question.
 
  • #15
chemisttree said:
It should because it’s correct, whether you’re a chemist or not. I am a chemist and I’ve never seen the term “relative density” used like this before. It is a clever way to test across several concepts. And using Avogadro’s analysis is precisely how to use the relative density information.

Concepts tested:
1) Mole concept
2) convert from volume to moles
3) convert from mass to moles
4) avogadro relationship of moles to volume
5) algebraic concept of relative ratios
6) distinguishing between empirical and molecular formula
7) concept of density
8) knowledge of combustion reaction

It’s a good question.
Thank you very much for your help
For your information these are from a Russian chemistry paper pre uni
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
19K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K