Find the general solution of the given PDE

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
This is a question set by myself;

Find the general solution of

##-4u_x+6u_y+10u=e^{x+2y}##
Relevant Equations
Method of characteristic.
My take;

##ξ=-4x+6y## and ##η=6x+4y##

it follows that,

##52u_ξ +10u=e^{x+2y}##

for the homogenous part; we shall have the general solution;

$$u_h=e^{\frac{-5}{26} ξ} f{η }$$

now we note that

$$e^{x+2y}=e^{\frac{8ξ+η}{26}}$$

that is from solving the simultaneous equation;

##ξ=-4x+6y## and ##η=6x+4y## where ##x=\dfrac{12ξ-18η}{156}## and ##y=\dfrac{3ξ+2η}{26}##

for the inhomogenous part, we shall have;

$$u_p = e^{\frac{-5}{26}ξ}\int \frac{e^{\frac{8ξ+η}{26}}⋅e^{\frac{5}{26}ξ}}{52} dξ$$$$u_p = \frac{e^{\frac{13ξ+η}{26}}⋅e^{\frac{-5}{26}ξ}}{26} $$

$$u(ξ,η)=u_h+u_p=e^{\frac{-5}{26} ξ} \left[ f(η)+\frac{e^{\frac{13ξ+η}{26}}}{26}\right]$$

$$u(x,y)=
e^{\frac{-5}{26} (-4x+6y)} \left[ f(6x+4y)+\frac{1}{26} {e^{\frac{-46x+82y}{26}}}\right]$$your insight is welcome or alternative approach to this problem.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
First divide by 2: <br /> -2 u_x + 3u_y + 5u = \tfrac12 e^{x+ 2y}. We want to change to variables (\zeta, \eta) with x_\zeta = -2 and y_\zeta = 3 so that -2u_x + 3u_y = u_xx_\zeta + u_yy_\zeta = u_\zeta. Note that you did the opposite, which was to set <br /> -4 u_x + 6u_y = u_x\xi_x + u_y \xi_y where the right hand side is not the multivariate chain rule for u_\xi.

We therefore set \begin{split}<br /> x &amp;= -2\zeta + a\eta \\ y &amp;= 3\zeta + b\eta \end{split} with a and b chosen such that <br /> x + 2y = 4\zeta + (a + 2b)\eta = 4\zeta. Any choice of b other than b = 0 gives us a 1-1 transformation, but the choice b = -\frac14 gives the convenient \eta = 3x + 2y, and from the above we have \zeta = \frac14(x+2y). The PDE is then reduced to <br /> u_\zeta + 5u = \tfrac12e^{4\zeta} which can be solved by an integrating factor.
 
@pasmith I'll need to go through your approach...cheers man! Just curious are we going to get same solutions? Your integrating factor seems different just by looking at it...
 
Last edited:
I get <br /> u = g(\eta&#039;)e^{-5\zeta} + \tfrac{1}{18}e^{4\zeta}.

I think you have made an error: If \xi = -4x + 6y and \eta = 6x + 4y then x = (3\eta - 2\xi)/26,\qquad y = (3\xi + 2\eta)/26. Your result of <br /> x = \frac{12\xi - 18\eta}{156} = \frac{2\xi - 3\eta}{26} is out by a factor of -1, so your calculation of x + 2y is incorrect; you should have <br /> x + 2y = \frac{7\eta + 4\xi}{26}. Note that in terms of my \zeta, \eta&#039; you have \begin{split}<br /> \eta &amp;= 2\eta&#039; \\<br /> \xi &amp;= 26\zeta - \frac{7}{2}\eta&#039;.\end{split} Now solving <br /> u_\xi + \frac{5}{26}u = \frac{1}{52}e^{(7\eta +4\xi)/26} gives \begin{split}<br /> u &amp;= f(\eta)e^{-5\xi/26} + \frac{1}{52}\frac{26}{9}e^{(7\eta+4\xi)/26} \\<br /> &amp;= f(\eta)e^{-5\xi/26} + \frac{1}{18}e^{(7\eta + 4\xi)/26}.\end{split} We agree on the second term, since 4\zeta = x + 2y = \frac{7\eta + 4\xi}{26}. For the first term, we have <br /> f(\eta)e^{-5\xi/26} = \overbrace{f(2\eta&#039;)e^{35\eta&#039;/52}}^{\equiv g(\eta&#039;)}e^{-5\zeta} as required.

I suspect you will agree that the numbers in my solution are simpler than in yours.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top