Find the position of a pendulum as a function of time?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The position of a pendulum as a function of time can be expressed with the equation f(t) = 0.35cos(1.81t), where 0.35 represents the initial maximum displacement from the equilibrium point and 1.81 is the angular frequency derived from the pendulum's period. The period (T) of the pendulum is calculated using the formula T = 2π√(l/g), with a string length (l) of 3.0m and a gravitational acceleration (g) of approximately 9.81 m/s². After 100 swings, the maximum displacement decreases from 0.35m to 0.15m, indicating energy loss due to damping.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion
  • Familiarity with pendulum mechanics
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions
  • Basic grasp of angular frequency calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the pendulum period formula T = 2π√(l/g)
  • Explore the concept of damping in oscillatory systems
  • Learn about angular frequency and its significance in harmonic motion
  • Investigate the effects of varying string lengths on pendulum behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and oscillatory motion, as well as educators seeking to explain pendulum dynamics and energy loss in oscillations.

Camphi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How do you find the position of a pendulum as a function of time?

Mass of bob: 2.0kg
String length (l): 3.0m

The pendulum is displaced as a distance of 0.35m from the equilibrium point and is then released. After 100 swings the maximum displacement of the pendulum has been reduced to 0.15m.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Period (T) of a pendulum: T = 2π√(l/g)

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer to the problem is f(t) = 0.35cos(1.81t) but I am not understanding how the 0.35 or the 1.81t is coming into play because I figured that if the angle is the point where the equilibrium point and the place where the pendulum is attached to a wall then the 0.35 would be opposite of this angle, not the adjacent of hypotenuse of the triangle created from the displacement of the pendulum. I also figured that the 0.35 was what the displacement was and I do not understand where the 1.81 came from at all.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have had an epiphany so moderators can lock this thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
3K