MHB Find the scale factor of triangle ABC to triangle DEF

masters1
Triangles ABC and DEF are similar.

Triangle ABC has a perimeter of 16cm.

Triangle DEF has side of 6cm, 8cm and 10cm.

What is the scale factor of triangle ABC to triangle DEF?

A. 1/2
B. 1/3
C. 2/3
D. 3/2
E. 2/1

I concluded the answer is D. Am I correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What is the scale factor of triangle ABC to triangle DEF?

perimeter of ABC : perimeter of DEF = 16:24 = 2:3
 
There is a difference between the "scale factor of triangle ABC to triangle DEF" and the "scale factor of triangle DEF to triangle ABC". You found the wrong one! Since ABC is smaller than DEF, the scale factor is less than 1.
 
Then, is this textbook example incorrect?
 

Attachments

  • what-is-a-scale-factor-multiplier-similar-triangles.png
    what-is-a-scale-factor-multiplier-similar-triangles.png
    9.1 KB · Views: 129
The dilation scale factor, which is a transformation, of triangle ABC to triangle DEF is 3/2

The scale ratio, like a map's scale, of triangle ABC to triangle DEF is 2/3

Sorry for the confusion.
 
skeeter said:
The dilation scale factor, which is a transformation, of triangle ABC to triangle DEF is 3/2

The scale ratio, like a map's scale, of triangle ABC to triangle DEF is 2/3

Sorry for the confusion.

So, the question asked about "scale factor", not ratio of any kind. Is the answer, in fact, "D", which is 3/2?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top