MHB Find the sum of the first 11 terms of given series

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum Terms
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the sum of the first 11 terms of the series $$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots$$ The original poster attempts to derive the nth term and expresses it as a sum, but struggles to simplify it effectively. A suggestion is made to separate the sums and avoid invalid cancellations, indicating that a common denominator might be necessary. Ultimately, it is agreed that using a computer algebra system (CAS) may be the most efficient way to solve the problem. The conversation highlights the complexity of the series and the challenges in manual calculation.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

This problem vexes me until my mind hurts.

Problem:

Find the sum of the first 11 terms of the series $$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots$$

Attempt:

I managed only to find the expression of the nth term of the given series and I got

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10(10^k)-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \left( \frac{1}{5}-\frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} \right)$$

$$=\frac{11}{5}-\frac{4}{5} \left( \frac{1}{99}+\frac{1}{999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term \right)$$

and I noticed this $$\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} $$isn't a geometric series and thus by rewriting the problem in this manner is a dead end and it won't solve the problem.

So I tried to break the given series as follows:

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=(\frac{1}{99}+\frac{9}{99})+(\frac{1}{999}+ \frac{2(99)}{999})+ \cdots+11th term$$

$$=\frac{1}{99}+\frac{1}{999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term+2 \left( \frac{99}{999}+\frac{999}{9999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term \right)$$and I know this is another cul-de-sac and I am getting so mad right now, I just don't see how to approach the problem.

Could anyone help me, please?

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

This problem vexes me until my mind hurts.

Problem:

Find the sum of the first 11 terms of the series $$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots$$

Attempt:

I managed only to find the expression of the nth term of the given series and I got

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10(10^k)-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \left( \frac{1}{5}-\frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} \right)$$

Alas, I don't think you made a valid move there. It is perilous to cancel things that aren't factors. You can separate out the two sums:
$$ \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10^{k+1}-1}=
2\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{10^k}{10^{k+1}-1}
- \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{1}{10^{k+1}-1}.$$
I'm not sure where this lands you. I would just hand it over to a CAS at this point.

You could try get a common denominator, which would look something like
$$\prod_{j=1}^{11}(10^{j+1}-1).$$
The resulting expression would be rather tedious to sort out.
 
Ackbach said:
Alas, I don't think you made a valid move there. It is perilous to cancel things that aren't factors. You can separate out the two sums:
$$ \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10^{k+1}-1}=
2\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{10^k}{10^{k+1}-1}
- \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{1}{10^{k+1}-1}.$$
I'm not sure where this lands you. I would just hand it over to a CAS at this point.

You could try get a common denominator, which would look something like
$$\prod_{j=1}^{11}(10^{j+1}-1).$$
The resulting expression would be rather tedious to sort out.

Thank you for the reply, Ackbach!:)

Yes, after spending more time to attempt to overcome the problem on my own, I agree that it's best to let the problem be handled by wolfram or any other CAS in order to get the exact value of the sum.
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K