MHB Find the sum of the first 11 terms of given series

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Sum Terms
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,

This problem vexes me until my mind hurts.

Problem:

Find the sum of the first 11 terms of the series $$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots$$

Attempt:

I managed only to find the expression of the nth term of the given series and I got

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10(10^k)-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \left( \frac{1}{5}-\frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} \right)$$

$$=\frac{11}{5}-\frac{4}{5} \left( \frac{1}{99}+\frac{1}{999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term \right)$$

and I noticed this $$\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} $$isn't a geometric series and thus by rewriting the problem in this manner is a dead end and it won't solve the problem.

So I tried to break the given series as follows:

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=(\frac{1}{99}+\frac{9}{99})+(\frac{1}{999}+ \frac{2(99)}{999})+ \cdots+11th term$$

$$=\frac{1}{99}+\frac{1}{999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term+2 \left( \frac{99}{999}+\frac{999}{9999}+ \cdots + 11^{th} term \right)$$and I know this is another cul-de-sac and I am getting so mad right now, I just don't see how to approach the problem.

Could anyone help me, please?

Thanks in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi MHB,

This problem vexes me until my mind hurts.

Problem:

Find the sum of the first 11 terms of the series $$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots$$

Attempt:

I managed only to find the expression of the nth term of the given series and I got

$$\frac{19}{99}+\frac{199}{999}+\frac{1999}{9999}+ \cdots+11^{th} term=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10(10^k)-1}=\sum_{k=1}^{11} \left( \frac{1}{5}-\frac{4}{5(10(10^k)-1)} \right)$$

Alas, I don't think you made a valid move there. It is perilous to cancel things that aren't factors. You can separate out the two sums:
$$ \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10^{k+1}-1}=
2\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{10^k}{10^{k+1}-1}
- \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{1}{10^{k+1}-1}.$$
I'm not sure where this lands you. I would just hand it over to a CAS at this point.

You could try get a common denominator, which would look something like
$$\prod_{j=1}^{11}(10^{j+1}-1).$$
The resulting expression would be rather tedious to sort out.
 
Ackbach said:
Alas, I don't think you made a valid move there. It is perilous to cancel things that aren't factors. You can separate out the two sums:
$$ \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{2(10)^k-1}{10^{k+1}-1}=
2\sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{10^k}{10^{k+1}-1}
- \sum_{k=1}^{11} \frac{1}{10^{k+1}-1}.$$
I'm not sure where this lands you. I would just hand it over to a CAS at this point.

You could try get a common denominator, which would look something like
$$\prod_{j=1}^{11}(10^{j+1}-1).$$
The resulting expression would be rather tedious to sort out.

Thank you for the reply, Ackbach!:)

Yes, after spending more time to attempt to overcome the problem on my own, I agree that it's best to let the problem be handled by wolfram or any other CAS in order to get the exact value of the sum.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top