Find the tension in the two strings

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Strings Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving an exam question involving the tension in two strings, T₁ and T₂, with an emphasis on their horizontal and vertical components. The participants highlight the importance of concise explanations and the need to reference the mark scheme, noting that lengthy justifications may waste time during exams. They clarify that the object is in equilibrium, which simplifies the analysis of forces, and emphasize the necessity of including units in final answers. Additionally, the conversation touches on the use of Lami's method for a simpler solution and the importance of understanding fundamental physics concepts. Overall, the dialogue underscores the balance between thoroughness and efficiency in problem-solving.
chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,825
Reaction score
413
Homework Statement
See attached;
Relevant Equations
Mechanics
This is an exam question - refreshing as usual.

1671443495984.png


Literature Overview;
In the free-body diagram shown above, we can see the horizontal and vertical components of the tension forces, T₁, and T₂. Forces are vectors, which means they always have both magnitudes and directions. Like all vectors, forces can be expressed in these components, which give the force's influence along the horizontal and vertical axes. T₁ₓ and T₂ₓ are the horizontal components of T₁ and T₂, respectively. On the other hand, T1y and T2y are the vertical components of the same forces, respectively. Since gravity acts on the object in the vertical axis, we need to consider the tension forces' vertical components for our summation of forces as follows:

##ΣF↑ = 0 = T_1 y + T_2 y + (-W)##

##T=W## where ##T=T_1 y + T_2 y##

##16 = T_1 \sin 40^0 + T_2 \sin 20^0##

We can also say that for the system to be in equilibrium, the object should not move horizontally or along the x-axis. Therefore, the horizontal components of T₁ and T₂ must then equate to zero. Also, with the help of trigonometry, we can express T₁ₓ and T₂ₓ in terms of T₁ and T₂, respectively:

##T_1 x = T_2 x##

##T_1 \cos 40^0 =T_2 \cos 20^0##

Therefore we shall have the simultaneous equation;

##16 = T_1 \sin 40^0 + T_2 \sin 20^0##

##T_1 \cos 40^0 =T_2 \cos 20^0##, Where;

##T_1=\dfrac{T_2 \cos 20^0}{\cos 40^0}##

Substituting on;

##16 = T_1 \sin 40^0 + T_2 \sin 20^0##, we shall have

##16=\dfrac {T_2 \sin 40^0 \cos 20^0}{\cos 40^0} + T_2 \sin 20^0##

##T_2(0.7885+0.342)=16##

##T_2 = 14.153## to 3 decimal places.

##T_1=\dfrac{14.153 ×\cos 20^0}{\cos 40^0}=17.361## to three decimal places.
Find mark scheme solution here;

1671445178033.png
Your insight is welcome.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
In the free-body diagram shown above,
The diagram shown is not a free body diagram.

chwala said:
we can see the horizontal and vertical components of the tension forces, T₁, and T₂. Forces are vectors, which means they always have both magnitudes and directions. Like all vectors, forces can be expressed in these components, which give the force's influence along the horizontal and vertical axes. T₁ₓ and T₂ₓ are the horizontal components of T₁ and T₂, respectively. On the other hand, T1y and T2y are the vertical components of the same forces, respectively. Since gravity acts on the object in the vertical axis, we need to consider the tension forces' vertical components for our summation of forces as follows:
The long explanation is unnecessary. Look at the mark scheeme - there are no marks associated with the explanation. In an examination, this would cost you valuable time for zero benefit.

chwala said:
We can also say that for the system to be in equilibrium, the object should not move horizontally or along the x-axis.
This is irrelevant. The question tells you that the object is in equlibrium. (In any case, an object can be moving and still be in equlibrium - providing its velocity is constant.)

chwala said:
Therefore, the horizontal components of T₁ and T₂ must then equate to zero. Also, with the help of trigonometry, we can express T₁ₓ and T₂ₓ in terms of T₁ and T₂, respectively:
You don't need to say all that.

chwala said:
##T_1 x = T_2 x##
To be consistant with your approach to the vertical components, you should write
##T_1 x + T_2 x = 0##

chwala said:
##T_2 = 14.153## to 3 decimal places.
##T_1=\dfrac{14.153 ×\cos 20^0}{\cos 40^0}=17.361## to three decimal places.
If these are intended as final answers, you have forgotten the units and 3 decimal places is unjustifiable.

Your understanding is good but (IM O) you should make your answers far more concise.

And note that Lami's method is much simpler!
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and chwala
Steve4Physics said:
The diagram shown is not a free body diagram.The long explanation is unnecessary. Look at the mark scheeme - there are no marks associated with the explanation. In an examination, this would cost you valuable time for zero benefit.This is irrelevant. The question tells you that the object is in equlibrium. (In any case, an object can be moving and still be in equlibrium - providing its velocity is constant.)You don't need to say all that.To be consistant with your approach to the vertical components, you should write
##T_1 x + T_2 x = 0##If these are intended as final answers, you have forgotten the units and 3 decimal places is unjustifiable.

Your understanding is good but (IM O) you should make your answers far more concise.

And note that Lami's method is much simpler!
@Steve4Physics thanks...kindly note that the literature (copy pasted from google) is only for my reference and future review of my own posts...my interest is solely on the understanding of the concept as it has been long since attempting these questions...feedback noted though- thanks mate.
 
Last edited:
:chwa
chwala said:
@Steve4Physics thanks...kindly note that the literature (copy pasted from google) is only for my reference and future review of my own posts...my interest is solely on the understanding of the concept as it has been long since attempting these questions...feedback noted though- thanks mate.
My apologies @chwala. I thought you had written the solution. Do you understand it? Or is there something you are struggling with?
 
Steve4Physics said:
:chwa

My apologies @chwala. I thought you had written the solution. Do you understand it? Or is there something you are struggling with?
I understand it...

I am just but refreshing ...I majorly teach Maths ...though in my undergraduate degree i did Physics (minor)... always good to refresh on the concepts. An interesting area was Electromagnetism, Polymer physics...cheers mate.
 
I would clarify in the solution that the units of weight and tensions are Newtons.
The hanging mass of 1.6 kg becomes 16 N in the initial equation without showing the mg step.
 
Lnewqban said:
I would clarify in the solution that the units of weight and tensions are Newtons.
The hanging mass of 1.6 kg becomes 16 N in the initial equation without showing the mg step.
Yes, that's pretty straightforward; we use ##w=mg##. Where ##g=10## m/s^2.
 
chwala said:
Yes, that's pretty straightforward; we use ##w=mg##.
Also, it may be useful to mention to the students that in practical terms, the angles could never be zero, because the magnitudes of the tensions would be infinite and either the rope/chain/cable or the anchors would fail.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics and chwala
Back
Top