Find the total work in a circuit

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving capacitors in a circuit, specifically focusing on the charge flow when a switch is closed, the work done by a voltage source, and the energy transferred into heat during this process. The participants explore theoretical aspects of circuit behavior, energy conservation, and the role of resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that when the switch is open, the charge on capacitor C1 is 40 µC, and C2 has no charge. Upon closing the switch, they propose that the charge q that flows through the capacitors is -10 µC.
  • Another participant argues that the resistor does not play a role in determining the charge moved since the focus is on total charge rather than current.
  • There is a discussion about the work associated with the voltage source and whether heat loss can be attributed to that work, with some participants suggesting that ideal capacitors do not lose energy as heat.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to determine the energy lost to heat, questioning the correctness of their calculations for parts a) and b).
  • Another participant confirms that the energy lost to heat can be determined from the total change in energy stored in the capacitors and the energy absorbed by the source, suggesting that if there were no resistance, those values should be equal.
  • There is a calculation presented for the change in energy of the capacitors, which leads to a discussion about the relationship between the energy of the voltage source and the energy difference of the capacitors.
  • One participant questions the sign of the energy associated with the voltage source and its role in the overall energy balance.
  • There is a clarification about the direction of charge flow and its implications for energy supply and absorption by the voltage source.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to analyze the energy changes in the system, but there are multiple competing views regarding the role of the resistor, the attribution of heat loss, and the interpretation of energy flow in the circuit. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical points.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the role of the resistor in energy calculations and the implications of ideal versus non-ideal components in the circuit. There are also unresolved questions about the energy balance involving the voltage source and the capacitors.

franktherabbit
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is a problem from some textbook a friend emailed me:
Diagram.JPG

The text goes like this:
When the switch is open the charge on ##C1## equals ##Q_o=40uC## and ##C_2## has no charge on it. The switch closes and some charge ##q## flows through the capacitors (suppose the flow to be from up to down). Find:
a) ##q##
b) work of generator ##V##
c) the amount of work transferred into heat during this process

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution [/B]
Well the voltage when the switch is open exists only on the ##C1## capacitor. When it closes the amount of ##q## charge flows thorugh the capacitors in order to equalize the sum of voltages across the capacitors with V, is that right? That makes ##q=-10uC##, right? But why didnt ##R## have any role in here? Usually we have a voltage drop since we have resistors and here we do not?
For the work of the generator we have formula ##W=Vq## right? and that makes is ##-100uJ##.
Im not sure about the last part but i guess its just the difference of energies of the system?
##E_1=\frac{1}{2}(Q_o)^2/C_1=400uJ##
##E_2=\frac{1}{2}(Q_o+q)^C_1+\frac{1}{2}(q)^2/C_2+Eq=1/4(900)+1/4(100)-100=150uJ##
so the work transferred into heat is just ##E_2-E_1=-250uJ## right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you're comparing initial states and final states in order find the amount of charge moved, the resistor doesn't come into play; you're looking at the total charge moved and not at the current. That will come later.

While it's true that there is work associated with the voltage source when the charges move, we can't attribute heat loss to that work since we don't know what the source is doing with the charge it accepts (the charge is flowing into the + terminal of the source). For all we know it behaves like an ideal battery and stores the energy and can return it later.

Similarly, the capacitors move energy in and out of electric fields, and ideal capacitors alone won't lose energy via heat. When energy is lost moving charges around between capacitors, it's always lost in the external circuit through some mechanism (Resistive losses are usually what it's attributed to in basic circuit theory).

So that leaves us with the resistor. That will definitely generate heat when current flows through it. The question then becomes, how might you determine that energy?
 
gneill said:
Since you're comparing initial states and final states in order find the amount of charge moved, the resistor doesn't come into play; you're looking at the total charge moved and not at the current. That will come later.

While it's true that there is work associated with the voltage source when the charges move, we can't attribute heat loss to that work since we don't know what the source is doing with the charge it accepts (the charge is flowing into the + terminal of the source). For all we know it behaves like an ideal battery and stores the energy and can return it later.

Similarly, the capacitors move energy in and out of electric fields, and ideal capacitors alone won't lose energy via heat. When energy is lost moving charges around between capacitors, it's always lost in the external circuit through some mechanism (Resistive losses are usually what it's attributed to in basic circuit theory).

So that leaves us with the resistor. That will definitely generate heat when current flows through it. The question then becomes, how might you determine that energy?
I can't think of a way to do it.. Is at least a) and b) correct?
 
franktherabbit said:
I can't think of a way to do it.. Is at least a) and b) correct?
Yes.

You have enough information to determine the energy lost to heat. You know the total change in energy stored on the capacitors and the energy absorbed by the source. If there were no resistance then those values should be the same...

Alternatively, and as a check, you might work out the equation for the current with respect to time. It's an RC circuit and will this have a time constant which you should be able to find using the given component values.
 
gneill said:
Yes.

You have enough information to determine the energy lost to heat. You know the total change in energy stored on the capacitors and the energy absorbed by the source. If there were no resistance then those values should be the same...

Alternatively, and as a check, you might work out the equation for the current with respect to time. It's an RC circuit and will this have a time constant which you should be able to find using the given component values.

Well the difference in the capacitor energies is:
##ΔE_c=(frac{1}{2}(Q_o+q)^C_1+\frac{1}{2}(q)^2/C_2)-\frac{1}{2}(Q_o)^2/C_1=-150uJ##
The work of the generator is ##Eq=-100uJ##
Since ##-250uJ## wasnt's correct i guess the equation is
##ΔE=ΔE_c-Eq=-50uJ## but why is it ##-Eq## we are subtracting the energy of the voltage source from the energy difference of capacitors? I don't understand why that's why i added in the first place.
 
The capacitors supplied energy while the source absorbed energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: doktorwho
gneill said:
The capacitors supplied energy while the source absorbed energy.

So the ##q## flows from - to + and it then absorbs it and if the voltage source was reversed it would supply it?
So if the q flows into - it supplys and revesed ot absorbs?
For example if the q was -30 and it was shown in orig picture to go into + of V it would mean that it supply's because the q is negative and it actually flows to the -?
 
doktorwho said:
So the ##q## flows from - to + and it then absorbs it and if the voltage source was reversed it would supply it?
So if the q flows into - it supplys and revesed ot absorbs?
For example if the q was -30 and it was shown in orig picture to go into + of V it would mean that it supply's because the q is negative and it actually flows to the -?

That's the idea. Pictorially:

upload_2017-2-3_11-36-17.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: doktorwho

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K