Find the values of a and b in a limit

  • Thread starter Thread starter songoku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
songoku
Messages
2,467
Reaction score
382
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Limit

L'Hopital Rule is not allowed
1664334550562.png


I know $$\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} af(h)+bf(2h)−f(0)=0$$
$$a+b=1$$

But I don't know how to find the second equation involving a and b. I imagine I need to somehow obtain ##h## in numerator so I can cross out with ##h## in denominator but I don't have idea how to get ##h## in the numerator.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using Taylor's theorem to express ##f(h)## as a linear polynomial in ##h## plus an error term that decreases superlinearly, and do the same for ##f(2h)##.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and topsquark
Office_Shredder said:
Try using Taylor's theorem to express ##f(h)## as a linear polynomial in ##h## plus an error term that decreases superlinearly, and do the same for ##f(2h)##.
Based on the definition of derivative that he gave in another thread, I think this is not the approach that is expected.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and topsquark
FactChecker said:
Based on the definition of derivative that he gave in another thread, I think this is not the approach that is expected.
Yes, my lesson has not covered Taylor's theorem

Office_Shredder said:
Try using Taylor's theorem to express ##f(h)## as a linear polynomial in ##h## plus an error term that decreases superlinearly, and do the same for ##f(2h)##.
I tried using Taylor's theorem, as suggested, as best as I can and by only taking the term up until ##h## I get ##a+2b=0##

Is there other possible method to solve the question without using Taylor?

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Yes, my lesson has not covered Taylor's theoremI tried using Taylor's theorem, as suggested, as best as I can and by only taking the term up until ##h## I get ##a+2b=0##

Is there other possible method to solve the question without using Taylor?

Thanks
Why not do the obvious decomposition of the limit into derivatives of ##f##?
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and songoku
PeroK said:
Why not do the obvious decomposition of the limit into derivatives of ##f##?
I think I understand this hint.

Thank you very much for the help Office_Shredder, FactChecker, PeroK
 
songoku said:
PeroK said:
Why not do the obvious decomposition of the limit into derivatives of ##f##?

I think I understand this hint.
Just in case you don't quite understand that hint, or the advice from @FactChecker in Post #3 ...

You had the following as one of the definitions for ##f'(x_0)##.

##\displaystyle f'(x_0)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(x_0+h)-f(x_0)}{h} ##

So that ##\displaystyle \ f'(0)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(h)-f(0)}{h} \ .##

You may not realize that ##\displaystyle \ \lim_{h \to 0} \frac{f(2h)-f(0)}{2h} = f'(0)\ ## as well.

(Added a short time later with the Edit feature):

In decomposing the given limit, take the ##\displaystyle \frac{b\,f(2h)}{h} ## term, for instance and write it as ##\displaystyle \frac{b\,(f(2h)-f(0))}{h} + \frac{b\,(f(0))}{h} \ .##

Do similarly with ##\displaystyle \frac{a\,f(h)}{h}##, combine like terms, etc.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes songoku
Back
Top