Find the velocity of a particle from the Lagrangian

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the velocity of a relativistic particle from its Lagrangian, which includes a central potential field. The participants are exploring the implications of the Lagrangian provided and the equations of motion associated with it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of Lagrange's equations and the potential use of Hamiltonian mechanics. There is uncertainty about how to proceed with the differentiation and integration of the equations derived from the Lagrangian.

Discussion Status

Some participants have suggested considering first integrals due to the time independence of the Lagrangian. Others are attempting to clarify their understanding of generalized coordinates and whether to use Hamiltonian or Lagrangian methods.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the need to express everything in a consistent set of generalized coordinates, with suggestions to use either Cartesian or spherical coordinates. Participants are grappling with the complexity of the equations and the implications of their choices in methodology.

Lightf
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the following Lagrangian of a relativistic particle moving in a D-dim space and interacting with a central potential field.

$$L=-mc^2 \sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}} - \frac{\alpha}{r}\exp^{-\beta r}$$

...

Find the velocity v of the particle as a function of p and r.


Homework Equations



Lagrange's Equations of motion

$$\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{dL}{dv})= \frac{dL}{dr}$$


The Attempt at a Solution



$$\frac{dL}{dr} = \frac{\alpha \exp^{-\beta r}(r+1)}{r^2}$$
$$\frac{dL}{dv} \equiv p = \frac{mc^2 v}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$
$$\frac{d}{dt}(\frac{mc^2 v}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}) = \frac{\alpha \exp^{-\beta r}(r+1)}{r^2}$$

I am not sure what to do next. If I try to differentiate the left side I get

$$mc^2 \dot{v}(v^2(1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^{-\frac{3}{2}} + (1-\frac{v^2}{c^2})^{-\frac{1}{2}} ) = \frac{\alpha \exp^{-\beta r}(r+1)}{r^2}$$

Which seems very hard to integrate.. Any ideas to find v easier?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about the first integrals! There is one very obvious from the fact that [itex]L[/itex] is not explicitly dependent on time.

Further it is important to write out everything in one set of generalized coordinates and their time derivatives. Either you use Cartesian coordinates and
[tex]\vec{v}=\frac{\mathrm{d} \vec{x}}{\mathrm{d} t}, \quad r=\sqrt{\vec{x} \cdot \vec{x}},[/tex]
or you write everything in spherical coordinates [itex]r, \vartheta,\varphi[/itex]!
 
Since the [itex]L[/itex] is not explicitly dependent on time [itex]\frac{dL}{dt}=0[/itex]. I cannot see the obvious :(

I will try to redo my work with generalised coordinates and see if I makes it clearer.
 
No! The Hamiltonian,
[tex]H=\vec{x} \cdot \vec{p}-L,[/tex]
where
[tex]\vec{p}=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\vec{x}}}[/tex]
is the canonical momentum of the particle.
 
Now I am confused. Should I use Hamiltion's equations then if I use the Hamiltonian? [itex]\dot{q}=\frac{dH}{dp}[/itex]?
 
Lightf said:
Now I am confused. Should I use Hamiltion's equations then if I use the Hamiltonian? [itex]\dot{q}=\frac{dH}{dp}[/itex]?

No, use the Lagrangian, just make sure you are using only one set of generalized coordinates. I would use Cartesian.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
977
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
920
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K