Find time at which position vector points towards origin

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the time at which a position vector of a particle, defined as R=(1-t^2)i+(3t-5t^2)j, points towards or away from the origin. The context is rooted in vector analysis and motion in a two-dimensional plane.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of the position vector pointing towards or away from the origin, discussing the relationship between the position and velocity vectors. There are attempts to clarify how to express velocity in relation to the position vector and what conditions must be met for the particle's motion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the mathematical relationships between the vectors. Some guidance has been offered regarding the conditions for the velocity vector in relation to the position vector, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may involve quadratic equations and that the solutions for time may not yield whole numbers. There is also mention of needing to satisfy both components of the vector simultaneously, which adds complexity to the problem.

Taniaz
Messages
364
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The position vector of a particle at time t is R=(1-t^2)i+(3t-5t^2)j. Find the time at which P is moving (a) towards the origin (b) away from the origin.[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



I've thought about this for a while but I've come to the conclusion that I'm not really sure what they're asking for when they say towards and away from the origin. I know that the acceleration is constant because if you keep deriving you get a = -2i - 10j

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are asking for a time when the velocity ##R'## is such that given ##R = x \hat i + y \hat j ##, ##R' ## is pointing in the direction of the origin.
For example, if R = (x,y), what would a velocity vector pointing toward the origin look like?
 
How did you deduce that? The velocity vector would be tangent to R?
 
Taniaz said:
How did you deduce that? The velocity vector would be tangent to R?
The velocity vector is the time derivative of the position vector by definition. Similarly, acceleration is the derivative of velocity.
 
Yes I do know that but I'm not sure what it looks like pointing towards and away from the origin.
 
Taniaz said:
Yes I do know that but I'm not sure what it looks like pointing towards and away from the origin.
In general, when we discuss vectors, they only have magnitude and direction. They do not have a specific anchor point. (Forces do have a point of application as well as being vectors.) But in this question, you need to think of the velocity as being a vector from the current position.
 
The position vector R starts from the origin so supposing it lies at some point (x,y) at time t, pointing away from the origin, so will we draw it from the tip of this position vector? If it's towards the origin, will it be pointing downwards from the tip?
 
Taniaz said:
The position vector R starts from the origin so supposing it lies at some point (x,y) at time t, pointing away from the origin, so will we draw it from the tip of this position vector? If it's towards the origin, will it be pointing downwards from the tip?
Yes, except that I'm not sure what you mean by 'downwards' there. It will be pointing from current position towards origin.
 
If it is pointing from the current position to the origin, then it will just be coinciding with the position vector in the opposite direction?
 
  • #10
Taniaz said:
If it is pointing from the current position to the origin, then it will just be coinciding with the position vector in the opposite direction?
Yes.
 
  • #11
But how does this tell us about time? We find the derivative of x to get velocity and equate it to negative of the position vector?
 
  • #12
Taniaz said:
But how does this tell us about time? We find the derivative of x to get velocity and equate it to negative of the position vector?
Yes, but only the direction, not the magnitude
 
  • #13
But that doesn't make sense because if you equate v= -R, how do you solve for t?
 
  • #14
Taniaz said:
But that doesn't make sense because if you equate v= -R, how do you solve for t?
You know the position at time t and the velocity at time t.
 
  • #15
Do we have to find an expression or a definite value for t?
 
  • #16
Taniaz said:
Do we have to find an expression or a definite value for t?
Two definite values.
 
  • #17
We do get 2 values for t for both the i and j components because it's a quadratic equation but for the one with towards the origin, the solutions aren't whole numbers I think
 
  • #18
Taniaz said:
We do get 2 values for t for both the i and j components because it's a quadratic equation but for the one with towards the origin, the solutions aren't whole numbers I think
Please post your working.
 
  • #19
v=-R and v=(-2t)i + (3-10t)j
(-2t)i + (3-10t)j = -(1-t^2)i - (3t-5t^2)j
(-2t)i + (3-10t)j = (-1+t^2)+(-3t+5t^2)j

(-2t)i = (-1+t^2)i and (3-10t)j=(-3t+5t^2)j
t = -1-sqrt2 or t = sqrt 2-1 for the i components and
t= (-7- sqrt 109)/10 or t =sqrt 109-7/10
 
  • #20
Taniaz said:
v=-R and v=(-2t)i + (3-10t)j
As I posted, the vectors are not equal and opposite. They only have opposite directions. The magnitudes can be different.
Taniaz said:
(-2t)i = (-1+t^2)i and (3-10t)j=(-3t+5t^2)j
t = -1-sqrt2 or t = sqrt 2-1 f
How did 'and' become 'or'?
 
  • #21
Sorry I meant and. Is this correct though?
 
  • #22
Taniaz said:
v=-R and v=(-2t)i + (3-10t)j
(-2t)i + (3-10t)j = -(1-t^2)i - (3t-5t^2)j
(-2t)i + (3-10t)j = (-1+t^2)+(-3t+5t^2)j

(-2t)i = (-1+t^2)i and (3-10t)j=(-3t+5t^2)j
t = -1-sqrt2 or t = sqrt 2-1 for the i components and
t= (-7- sqrt 109)/10 or t =sqrt 109-7/10
You are looking for one t that satisfies both the i and j components at the same time.
Let v = cR, where c is any non-zero constant. If c is negative then the velocity is pointing toward the origin. When c is positive, the velocity is pointing away from the origin.
 
  • #23
Ah that makes sense! Thank you Haruspex and RUber! :smile:
 
  • #24
After adding in the c, you should be able to find a solution that satisfies your and condition.
##t = ( -1 - \sqrt{2} \text{ or } -1 + \sqrt{2} ) \text{ and } ( \frac{-7 - \sqrt{109}}{10} \text{ or } \frac{-7 + \sqrt{109}}{10} )## are inconsistent.
## -2t \hat i + (3-10t) \hat j = (c-ct^2 )\hat i - (3ct + 5ct^2)\hat j \\
ct^2 -2t -c = 0 \text{ and } 5ct^2 + (3c-10)t + 3 = 0##
 
  • #25
Correct me if I've misunderstood what you just said. So up till the values of t, it's correct? We just need to find which values of t give c as negative and that will indicate that it's pointing to the origin?
 
  • #26
The work you posted in #19 is correct for v = (-1)R. Replace -1 with a c, and rewrite the equations.
 
  • #27
I understand but then how do you solve for c?
ct^2−2t−c=0 and 5ct^2+(3c−10)t+3=0
I put in the values for t that I found and then see if c is negative?
 
  • #28
Ok so the values of t all seem to give c=-1 which seems to be alright in this case. I'm guessing this equations are general ct^2−2t−c=0 and 5ct^2+(3c−10)t+3=0 where you can substitute for whatever you think c is and solve for t?
 
  • #29
I don't see how c = -1 works.
You have two times for i and two different times for j.
You need a time that satisfies both i and j.

The two equations in #24 must both be true. One method is to solve for t in terms of c using linear algebra, then solve one or both of the equations for t as a quadratic.
Finally set your solutions for t equal to each other to find c. You should be able to find a positive and a negative c.
 
  • #30
I understand what you're saying but isn't this a little too complicated for a 1 mark A'Level question?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K