Find Unit Vector Orthogonal to a & b - Help Needed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a unit vector orthogonal to two given vectors, a = <1, 8, 1> and b = <1, 16, 1>. The initial attempt yielded a vector of <1/8, 0, -1/8>, which was not a unit vector. Participants confirmed that using the cross product followed by normalization (dividing by the magnitude) is the correct approach. The user ultimately identified their calculation error in the normalization process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations, specifically cross products
  • Knowledge of vector normalization techniques
  • Familiarity with basic calculus concepts
  • Ability to perform calculations involving magnitudes of vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the process of calculating cross products in three-dimensional space
  • Study vector normalization and its applications in physics and mathematics
  • Practice problems involving orthogonal vectors and unit vectors
  • Explore advanced topics in linear algebra, such as vector spaces and transformations
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who need to understand vector operations and their applications in various fields.

samazing18
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hi! I'm new to the forums, and had a question that was more calculus-related than physics. i saw another post similar to this one, but it was incomplete and i couldn't get the answer with the information on it, any chance someone could help me out?

The question is:
"Find a unit vector with a positive first coordinate that's orthogonal to both 'a' and 'b'
a=<1,8,1>
b=<1,16,1>"

the answer i got (which is only 1/3 right) was <1/8,0,-1/8>

i've tried using cross products, and then dividing by the magnitude of the cross product to get the unit vector, but only get the j variable right, and not i and k. I've also tried projecting a onto b (and visa versa) to find parallel vectors, and then trying the cross product again, but still can't seem to get the right answer. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The vector you get is certainly orthogonal to both a and b, but it isn't a unit vector. This leads me to believe that you made some sort of mistake when you computed/divided by the magnitude of the cross product.
 


morphism said:
The vector you get is certainly orthogonal to both a and b, but it isn't a unit vector. This leads me to believe that you made some sort of mistake when you computed/divided by the magnitude of the cross product.

I second this. I didn't do the work myself, but dividing the components of the vector by the magnitude of the vector is the correct method to use so you probably did make a mistake in your calculations.
 


you're both right, and i found the error. thank's a lot
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K