Find Vc(t) given iC(t): Initial Condition Included

  • Thread starter Thread starter eehelp150
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the voltage across a capacitor, Vc(t), given the current through it, iC(t), and an initial condition. The integration of iC(t) leads to a formula for Vc(t), which includes an integration constant that must be determined using the initial condition Vc(0-) = 3V. Participants clarify that the integration constant represents the initial voltage and cannot be eliminated, despite concerns about its complexity. A proposed alternative approach by a participant is deemed incorrect, as it fails to account for the periodic return of the capacitor voltage to its initial state. The final consensus is that the correct expression for Vc(t) must include the integration constant to accurately reflect the initial condition.
eehelp150
Messages
235
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2016-10-30_16-34-51.png


iC(t) = 10cos(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3v

Homework Equations


ic = C * d/dt*Vc(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


Vc(t) = 1/C * integral(Ic(t)dt) =
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4)

What do I do with the initial condition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eehelp150 said:
What do I do with the initial condition?
It's the integration constant.
 
##v_C(t)\ =\ V_C(0)\ +\ \frac 1C \displaystyle\int_{0}^{t} ... ##
 
gneill said:
It's the integration constant.
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
 
eehelp150 said:
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
See NascentOxygen's post above. That's the formula you should use. Integration constant is nothing but Vc at t=0-.
 
cnh1995 said:
See NascentOxygen's post above. That's the formula you should use. Integration constant is nothing but Vc at t=0-.
sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 [0 t]

sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 + sin(pi/4)/100
3 + 1000000(sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 + sqrt(2)*50)
3 + 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + 50000000sqrt(2)
 
eehelp150 said:
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
Well, actually this is right. I verified it using the above formula. I didn't look through your solution in detail earlier. But it looks correct to me now.
 
cnh1995 said:
Well, actually this is right. I verified it using the above formula. I didn't look through your solution in detail earlier. But it looks correct to me now.
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
 
eehelp150 said:
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
No. The constant can't be eliminated because of the initial condition. You can make it look better by writing it as
Vc(t)=10sin(wt+pi/4)-7.068 kV.
 
  • #10
cnh1995 said:
No. The constant can't be eliminated because of the initial condition. You can make it look better by writing it as
Vc(t)=10sin(wt+pi/4)-7.068 kV.
I asked my friend how he did it and he showed me this:
10000sin(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
sin(k+pi/4) = 0.0003
k + pi/4 = sin^-1(0.0003)
k = (sin^-1(0.0003)-45degrees)/1000 = 0.045s
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
Is this even remotely correct or did he just bs it?
The reason I'm asking if it can be simplified further is because so far, most of the questions have had nice numbers.
 
  • #11
eehelp150 said:
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
This is not where you add the integration constant.
eehelp150 said:
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
This does not give Vc=3V at t=0.

Also, I don't understand what problem will having that constant in the equation cause. "Nice numbers" and "ugly constants" do not matter in an equation as long as it is mathematically and technically correct. Is it specifically asked in the question to remove the constant?
 
  • #12
eehelp150 said:
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
Well, if you leave your calculator and root two alone the ugly constant is just ##5000 \sqrt{2} - 3##.
 
  • #13
eehelp150 said:
I asked my friend how he did it and he showed me this:
10000sin(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
sin(k+pi/4) = 0.0003
k + pi/4 = sin^-1(0.0003)
k = (sin^-1(0.0003)-45degrees)/1000 = 0.045s
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
Is this even remotely correct or did he just bs it?
The reason I'm asking if it can be simplified further is because so far, most of the questions have had nice numbers.
That is a creative approach, but it's not correct.

Over one full cycle (or period) the nett charge that the sinusoidal input current will have added to the capacitor is ZERO. This means that after each cycle of current, the capacitor voltage must back to where it started, i.e., it will have returned to VC(0). Your answer must show this.

In contrast, if the capacitor voltage were (as your friend claims) a pure sinusoid with no DC offset, it would not show this periodic return to V(0) at times of t = n⋅T, where T is the period and n is an integer.
 
  • #14
Your friend's approach would be appropriate had the problem specified:
iC(t) = 10cos(1000t + ##\theta##[/color] )
Vc(0-) = 3v

and so you'd be required to determine the ##\theta##[/color] that gives VC(0) as 3v. But this not what you are told about iC(t). You are not told it has some unknown phase; on the contrary, you are told it has some definite angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K