Find Vc(t) given iC(t): Initial Condition Included

  • Thread starter Thread starter eehelp150
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the voltage across a capacitor, Vc(t), given the current through it, iC(t), and an initial condition. The context includes mathematical reasoning and exploration of integration constants related to capacitor behavior in response to sinusoidal current input.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation for iC(t) and attempts to derive Vc(t) using integration, questioning how to incorporate the initial condition.
  • Another participant suggests that the initial condition serves as the integration constant.
  • There is a discussion about the integration constant and its relation to the initial voltage, with calculations showing a value for K that some participants find questionable.
  • Some participants propose that the integration constant cannot be eliminated due to the initial condition, while others suggest ways to express the result more neatly.
  • A participant shares an alternative method provided by a friend, which involves manipulating the sine function to find a phase shift, but this approach is challenged by others who argue it does not satisfy the initial condition.
  • Concerns are raised about the implications of having a constant in the equation and whether it affects the correctness of the solution.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the sinusoidal nature of the current implies the capacitor voltage must return to its initial value after each cycle, contradicting the friend's approach.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the conditions of the problem, highlighting that the phase of the current is specified and not arbitrary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the handling of the integration constant and the validity of alternative approaches. There is no consensus on the correctness of the friend's method, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the best way to express Vc(t) while satisfying the initial condition.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the initial condition significantly influences the integration constant, and there are unresolved questions about the implications of having a constant in the final expression for Vc(t). The discussion also highlights the importance of adhering to the specified parameters of the problem.

eehelp150
Messages
235
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2016-10-30_16-34-51.png


iC(t) = 10cos(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3v

Homework Equations


ic = C * d/dt*Vc(t)

The Attempt at a Solution


Vc(t) = 1/C * integral(Ic(t)dt) =
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4)

What do I do with the initial condition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eehelp150 said:
What do I do with the initial condition?
It's the integration constant.
 
##v_C(t)\ =\ V_C(0)\ +\ \frac 1C \displaystyle\int_{0}^{t} ... ##
 
gneill said:
It's the integration constant.
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
 
eehelp150 said:
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
See NascentOxygen's post above. That's the formula you should use. Integration constant is nothing but Vc at t=0-.
 
cnh1995 said:
See NascentOxygen's post above. That's the formula you should use. Integration constant is nothing but Vc at t=0-.
sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 [0 t]

sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 + sin(pi/4)/100
3 + 1000000(sin(1000t+pi/4)/100 + sqrt(2)*50)
3 + 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + 50000000sqrt(2)
 
eehelp150 said:
1/10^-6 * 10sin(1000t+pi/4)/1000 = 10000sin(1000t+pi/4) + K

Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+pi/4) + K = 3
7071.0678 + K = 3
K = -7068.06781186547524400844362104
?
That doesn't seem right...
Well, actually this is right. I verified it using the above formula. I didn't look through your solution in detail earlier. But it looks correct to me now.
 
cnh1995 said:
Well, actually this is right. I verified it using the above formula. I didn't look through your solution in detail earlier. But it looks correct to me now.
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
 
eehelp150 said:
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
No. The constant can't be eliminated because of the initial condition. You can make it look better by writing it as
Vc(t)=10sin(wt+pi/4)-7.068 kV.
 
  • #10
cnh1995 said:
No. The constant can't be eliminated because of the initial condition. You can make it look better by writing it as
Vc(t)=10sin(wt+pi/4)-7.068 kV.
I asked my friend how he did it and he showed me this:
10000sin(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
sin(k+pi/4) = 0.0003
k + pi/4 = sin^-1(0.0003)
k = (sin^-1(0.0003)-45degrees)/1000 = 0.045s
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
Is this even remotely correct or did he just bs it?
The reason I'm asking if it can be simplified further is because so far, most of the questions have had nice numbers.
 
  • #11
eehelp150 said:
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
This is not where you add the integration constant.
eehelp150 said:
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
This does not give Vc=3V at t=0.

Also, I don't understand what problem will having that constant in the equation cause. "Nice numbers" and "ugly constants" do not matter in an equation as long as it is mathematically and technically correct. Is it specifically asked in the question to remove the constant?
 
  • #12
eehelp150 said:
Is there any way to simplify this so that there's no ugly constant?
Well, if you leave your calculator and root two alone the ugly constant is just ##5000 \sqrt{2} - 3##.
 
  • #13
eehelp150 said:
I asked my friend how he did it and he showed me this:
10000sin(1000t+pi/4)
Vc(0-) = 3
10000sin(0+k+pi/4) = 3
sin(k+pi/4) = 0.0003
k + pi/4 = sin^-1(0.0003)
k = (sin^-1(0.0003)-45degrees)/1000 = 0.045s
Vc(t) = 10^4*sin(1000t)V
Is this even remotely correct or did he just bs it?
The reason I'm asking if it can be simplified further is because so far, most of the questions have had nice numbers.
That is a creative approach, but it's not correct.

Over one full cycle (or period) the nett charge that the sinusoidal input current will have added to the capacitor is ZERO. This means that after each cycle of current, the capacitor voltage must back to where it started, i.e., it will have returned to VC(0). Your answer must show this.

In contrast, if the capacitor voltage were (as your friend claims) a pure sinusoid with no DC offset, it would not show this periodic return to V(0) at times of t = n⋅T, where T is the period and n is an integer.
 
  • #14
Your friend's approach would be appropriate had the problem specified:
iC(t) = 10cos(1000t + ##\theta##[/color] )
Vc(0-) = 3v

and so you'd be required to determine the ##\theta##[/color] that gives VC(0) as 3v. But this not what you are told about iC(t). You are not told it has some unknown phase; on the contrary, you are told it has some definite angle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K