Find velocity of an accelerated proton using kinetic energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the final velocity of a proton accelerated by a particle accelerator, using its kinetic energy just before collision, which is given as 4.7066×10^(-13) J. Participants are exploring the application of both classical and relativistic physics principles to solve the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of classical kinetic energy formulas and the need to apply relativistic equations due to the high speeds involved. There are questions about the correct application of logarithmic functions in calculations and the relevance of the Lorentz factor in determining the speed of the proton.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various approaches to the problem, with some participants suggesting recalculating using classical methods before applying relativistic corrections. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the Lorentz factor and its significance in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for confusion regarding the definitions of mass and energy in relativistic contexts, as well as the importance of understanding the limits of classical physics when dealing with relativistic speeds.

Tiggy B
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I'm trying to find the final velocity of a proton that is being accelerated by a particle accelerator, just before it collides with a particle. All I have is its kinetic energy just before collision: 4.7066×10^(-13) J.

I thought I should use KE = 1/2 mv^2 but then realized it should be traveling near the speed of light, so I used Einstein's equation for special relativity to find the relative mass

I.e. I subbed in "m (rest)/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))" for mass

However, when I solved for 'v' (which involved lots of algebra and logs), I got 1.713×10^31 m/s

THAT'S WAY TOO FAST!
I have checked my working a few times so I suspect there is something intrinsically wrong- should I not use relativistic mass?

Homework Equations


KE = 1/2 mv^2
m (relative) = m (rest)/sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2))

The Attempt at a Solution


Attempt is attached as a pdf- to preserve formatting

Thanks for any thoughts or help! :)
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
You used the wrong classical answer for velocity and plugged it into the relativistic formula? That does not work.
 
You certainly need to use relativistic energy.
Ek = E - E0 is the given KE.
Note that Ek = m0 c^2 (1 / A - 1) where m0 may be referred to as the rest mass of the proton.
where A is the relativistic factor (1 - v^2 / c^2)^1/2.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tiggy B
You made a very basic error. You applied logarithm to a sum. log(a+b) is not log(a) + log(b)!

Determine the speed of the proton with the classical formula. With v obtained, calculate the Lorentz factor and see if it appreciably deviates from 1. If the difference is less than 0.01, you do not need the relativistic formula.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tiggy B
@J Hann thanks- I'll re-calculate it with that- we only ever learned relativistic mass, length and time in class so I assumed there weren't other equations (whoops)

@ehild I applied the multiplication rule... log (a) + log (b) = log (a*b)
But thanks for recommending the Lorentz factor- the more maths and equation knowledge I can put in my solution the better! :)
 
@J Hann Wait a sec- shouldn't I just use E= m(r)*c^2 - m0*c^2 ? Or is your equation derived from that?
 
ehild said:
Determine the speed of the proton with the classical formula.
I would start here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tiggy B
mfb said:
I would start here.
Ok- I did so, and got roughly 2.4*10^7 m/s, which gave a Lorentz factor of 1.003

ehild said:
With v obtained, calculate the Lorentz factor and see if it appreciably deviates from 1. If the difference is less than 0.01, you do not need the relativistic formula.

So I'll have a go with the relativistic equation now...

Does 1.003 represent that there is a dilation of 3%? I'm just trying to figure out how to explain that calculation, and the internet generally describes the Lorentz factor as time dilation, which doesn't really make sense in this case...

Thanks for all the help C:
 
Tiggy B said:
Ok- I did so, and got roughly 2.4*10^7 m/s, which gave a Lorentz factor of 1.003
Which means you can probably neglect special relativity. If you don't want to do that:

The Lorentz factor depends on velocity only, and you can directly calculate it based on the given energy and the proton mass. Solve for velocity, done.
 
  • #10
mfb said:
Which means you can probably neglect special relativity. If you don't want to do that:

The Lorentz factor depends on velocity only, and you can directly calculate it based on the given energy and the proton mass. Solve for velocity, done.

Yep I used special relativity, because my teacher keeps emphasising that we should be doing "complicated" calculations.
Now I'll have to see if my teacher likes what I've done :)
 
  • #11
Some people will say (as per Einstein) that the total energy whether at rest or moving is
m c^2 / (1 - v^2 / c^2)^1/2
and that the relativistic quantity involved is momentum not mass - mass is mass at rest or moving.
If that's confusing, don't worry because most textbooks use m = m0 / (1 - v^2 / c^2)^1/2
and the results are the same.
The 1.003 that you found involves 1 / (1 - v^2 / c^2)^1/2 and allows you to calculate v as
a percentage of c.
The binomial theorem is commonly used expand (1 - v^2 / c^2)^-1/2 when v nearly equals c.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Tiggy B said:
Ok- I did so, and got roughly 2.4*10^7 m/s, which gave a Lorentz factor of 1.003
If your teacher wants you to apply SR, use the formula
KE=mc^2 \left( \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}}-1 \right)
to get the Lorentz factor, and the speed v from that. You will get the same v with three significant digits as you have got with the classical method.
Avoid to use logarithms. You have a calculator, don't you?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
957
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
542
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K